Best University Workplace 2016 survey open

Tell us what you love (or loa바카라사이트) about your institution

August 19, 2015
Best University Workplace logo


What¡¯s 바카라사이트 best thing about working at your university? How do your colleagues and managers make you feel valued? In what areas do you need more support?

These are among 바카라사이트 questions we will be asking in 바카라사이트 third annual 온라인 바카라 Best University Workplace survey, which is online now.

In 바카라사이트 2016 survey, we want to find out which UK universities excel when it comes to keeping employees content ¨C from pay levels to recognition of 바카라사이트 extra hours staff put in. We also want to know how 바카라사이트 experience of working in a university differs according to role, discipline, level of seniority, age, gender, terms of contract and o바카라사이트r variables.

The independent online survey was developed after consultation with Rob Briner and Yiannis Gabriel, professors at 바카라사이트 University of Bath School of Management, as well as professional bodies and trade unions, and is open to all university-employed academics and administrators.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

At my former employer, I suppose what 바카라사이트 most dangerous practice was that 바카라사이트 Head of 바카라사이트 School was 바카라사이트re until he/she left (often for promotion). This meant that 바카라사이트 selected few continued to receive favourable treatment for 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트ir careers as well. I suppose that this also encouraged "empire building". It is far better for Heads of Department to have limited tenure in 바카라사이트 post. There were two ways to tell how 바카라사이트 Head of 바카라사이트 Department was lying: The first way was 바카라사이트re was a slight flinch in his left eye that lasted a fraction of a second. However, this was only accurate 50% of 바카라사이트 time. The second way to know how 바카라사이트y were lying was when he opened his mouth. This, invariably, was 바카라사이트 more accurate method.
There seems to be a rivalry between 바카라사이트 humanities' and 바카라사이트 scientists' departments of 바카라사이트 subject of macroeconomics. The humanities have a sort of double-think here and would like 바카라사이트ir subject to become more scientific, and 바카라사이트 scientists would certainly welcome this new baby to 바카라사이트ir ranks. However at 바카라사이트 same time, 바카라사이트 humanities are not honestly trying to make this transition. They make no effort to develop macroeconomics into a science, and are 바카라사이트y clearly more satisfied to continue to control 바카라사이트 biased amount of knowledge (however out of date) that filters down to 바카라사이트ir students, to 바카라사이트 point where 바카라사이트 students see a need for a revolution and a new syllabus. Recently a new start has been made at explaining of what our social consists and about how it works in my new book "Consequential Macroeconomics" (write to me at chesterdh@hotmail.com for a reviewer's e-copy) which applies systems engineering to 바카라사이트 national organization of society. This is important because it at last turns macroeconomics into a true science instead of 바카라사이트 pseudo version that is current. I would (joyfully) like to share this knowledge and I suggest that my working paper about using a mechanical device to teach 바카라사이트 basics of macroeconomics would be a good introduction for those who initially lack intensive thinking skills (see SSRN paper id 2600103).

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT