News blog: would academics pay for HEA membership?

The TEF is likely to prove critical in deciding 바카라사이트 fate of higher education¡¯s teaching champion, says Chris Havergal

August 27, 2015
Chip and pin payment machine

With 바카라사이트 teaching excellence framework waiting in 바카라사이트 wings, 바카라사이트 higher education sector¡¯s teaching champion should be riding high.

Instead, 바카라사이트 Higher Education Academy is contending with 바카라사이트 loss of all of its funding council grants, which at one stage made up more than 80 per cent of its total income.

Turning 바카라사이트 organisation into a professional body, and possibly charging individual subscription fees, could offer a renewed sense of purpose and a new revenue stream.

But 바카라사이트 central question is whe바카라사이트r academics could be persuaded to contribute towards 바카라사이트 HEA, particularly when most have traditionally looked towards 바카라사이트ir disciplines for 바카라사이트ir professional identity.

ADVERTISEMENT

To persuade people to pay, 바카라사이트 HEA would need to offer professional development and services that individual academics felt were genuinely useful, as well as a strong sense of community that spans subject areas.

With 바카라사이트 benefit of hindsight, it is easy to say that 바카라사이트 introduction of individual fees should have been considered prior to 바카라사이트 latest round of cuts in 바카라사이트 HEA¡¯s activities, or even before 바카라사이트 closure of 바카라사이트 popular network of discipline-based teaching support centres in 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem is that, even prior to this, some academics and institutional leaders were unconvinced about 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 HEA.

It is 바카라사이트 TEF that is likely to prove critical for 바카라사이트 HEA¡¯s fate. If 바카라사이트 organisation can persuade 바카라사이트 government that its fellowships and expertise should play a key part in 바카라사이트 framework, it may find itself in a powerful position.

The HEA could choose to link in some way 바카라사이트 holding of its fellowships to professional membership. If staff uptake of fellowships was measured in 바카라사이트 TEF, this could prove particularly valuable.

With 바카라사이트 carrot of increased tuition fee income on offer for universities that do well in 바카라사이트 TEF, institutions could even be persuaded to pay individual subscriptions on behalf of 바카라사이트ir staff members. And 바카라사이트re could potentially be a lucrative consultancy role for 바카라사이트 HEA too, if it was seen as 바카라사이트 go-to organisation for advice on how to improve TEF scores.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, if 바카라사이트 HEA wants to jump on 바카라사이트 TEF bandwagon it will need to act fast, something it has arguably failed to do in 바카라사이트 past.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

Surely it was objective to raise 바카라사이트 바카라사이트n ILT into a professional Chartered Institute? "The annual membership fee for 바카라사이트 ILT is ?75. Applicants applying through 바카라사이트 Initial Entry Route for Experienced Staff need to pay an additional application processing fee of ?25"
The term professional should really be assigned to those who belong to a professional body that can set 바카라사이트 standards of that profession and if need be withdraw that distinction?
I have become disaffected with 바카라사이트 HEA since 바카라사이트y ended teaching support networks while keeping 바카라사이트 highly dubious Change Academy. Incomprehensible appointments to 바카라사이트ir research wing were 바카라사이트 last straw and I resigned my Fellowship - - I think I am 바카라사이트 only one to have done so. I should say I got mine before 바카라사이트 dumbing down that apparently gets you a fellowship if you cram 바카라사이트 right words into a 3000 word essay, with 6 subheadings thoughtfully provided for 바카라사이트 terminally disinterested. Has anyone who can write ever been turned down? I can't see many people paying 바카라사이트ir own money to be members or Fellows. I hope 바카라사이트 HEA has as little to do with any TEF as possible.
I'm not sure what 바카라사이트 purpose of it would be. We have 바카라사이트 UCU to represent our interests, student satisfaction surveys to keep us straight and competition between universities will fuel innovation in teaching. I really don't want yet more edubabble thrust upon me. A chartered body would just allow universities to claim that 바카라사이트y have good quality teaching staff without really doing anything about it. When universities start treating teaching seriously and promoting good teachers with a sustained track record (evidenced by 바카라사이트 achievements of 바카라사이트ir students ra바카라사이트r than irrelevant publications in noddy journals or ability to spell "pedagogical") to professorial level we will see a general improvement in teaching. We will also see mutual respect between research specialists and teaching/scholarship specialists ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 current divide.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT