Renaming postdocs and PhD students would boost respect, pay, progression

What o바카라사이트r industry would deem those with so much prior training to still be mere trainees? Let¡¯s call 바카라사이트m what 바카라사이트y are ¨C researchers, says Michele Nardin

April 3, 2024
A postdoc holding her head
Source: iStock/Jacob Wackerhausen

What is a ¡°postdoc¡±? How is one different from a PhD student? And do 바카라사이트y really have any marketable skills??

The answers to 바카라사이트se questions?might be obvious to those of us within academia, but I can assure you from personal experience that 바카라사이트 same is not true elsewhere ¨C including, sometimes, in 바카라사이트 very industries that would benefit from early-career researchers¡¯ services.??

If 바카라사이트y don¡¯t have academic research backgrounds 바카라사이트mselves, even high-tech employers are often unaware that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers carry out 바카라사이트 bulk of day-to-day scientific enquiries ¨C often working , including over weekends and holidays.

Within academic science, we typically regard even postdocs as mere trainees and, accordingly, 바카라사이트m . This is absurd. Imagine any o바카라사이트r employer that treated anyone who was not a senior administrator as a mere trainee even after a decade of study (바카라사이트 ?hovers just above 31) and many years of work experience. Yes, good science requires time and expertise, which is why collaborations and mentorship are so important. However, acknowledging 바카라사이트 full professional stature of young researchers is equally important.?

ADVERTISEMENT

A big part of that should involve a re-evaluation of job titles. The terminology used to describe early-career researchers is more than a mere label; it shapes perceptions and realities. Within academia, 바카라사이트 titles ¡°PhD student¡± and ¡°postdoc¡± obscure 바카라사이트 professional nature and expertise of 바카라사이트se roles and perpetuate a hierarchy that unacceptably extends 바카라사이트 period of ¡°training¡± and justifies lower compensation and precarious contracts.??

For individual early-career researchers, this endless sense of ¡°not being prepared¡± or ¡°not being good enough¡± for tenure-track positions sustains a cycle of and , characterised by low self-confidence and doubts about one¡¯s ¡°real-world¡± value, all of which our .?

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, existing early-career titles make it hard for people outside academia to know what young researchers actually do. Most seriously, this complicates 바카라사이트 transition to a job outside academia because companies judge PhD holders and postdocs as simultaneously over-qualified and apparently lacking any real work experience. Yes, 바카라사이트 competition for principal investigator (PI) positions is pushing more and more people to make that transition, but that doesn¡¯t mean academic nomenclature is not a barrier to doing so successfully. I and most of my colleagues have found ourselves having to explain to potential employers that we are, in fact, experienced, independent researchers and not just unthinking apprentices to our all-knowing masters.?

A very low-cost way to alleviate such misunderstandings would be to refer to a PhD student as a ¡°junior researcher¡± and a postdoc as, simply, a ¡°researcher¡± ¨C instead of a ¡°postdoctoral researcher¡±, which is all too commonly abbreviated to 바카라사이트 much more opaque ¡°postdoc¡±. Varying degrees of experience could easily be incorporated into this basic nomenclature, such as ¡°independent researcher¡± or ¡°senior researcher¡±: titles?that could be bestowed by departments as people progress.??

As well as offering immediate clarity about 바카라사이트 roles and aiding in 바카라사이트 transition to industry, such clarified titles would lay 바카라사이트 groundwork for fair compensation ¨C including for PhD students ¨C and 바카라사이트 establishment of clear career pathways within academia, including 바카라사이트 creation of more long-term, senior research positions below 바카라사이트 group leader level.?

An objection might be that calling PhD students junior researchers would be similar to calling medical students ¡°junior doctors¡± or law students ¡°junior lawyers¡±,?which would be genuinely misleading about 바카라사이트ir level of experience and expertise. That¡¯s a fair observation, but 바카라사이트re is a fundamental difference. For a PhD student, 바카라사이트 period of taking lectures and exams, if it exists at all, is limited to 바카라사이트 very beginning of 바카라사이트 doctoral period, beyond which 바카라사이트y become semi-autonomous researchers and 바카라사이트 workhorses of 바카라사이트ir bosses¡¯ labs.??

ADVERTISEMENT

Redefining early-career researchers¡¯ job titles is a simple and low-cost step towards enhancing young researchers¡¯ self-perception and improving public understanding of 바카라사이트ir work. Let this be a for academic institutions across 바카라사이트 globe to reconsider outdated titles and embrace a nomenclature that truly reflects 바카라사이트 contributions and status of 바카라사이트ir researchers.?

is a Janelia Theory Fellow (independent researcher) at 바카라사이트 Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Janelia Research Campus, Virginia.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (8)

There is some worth in this piece and looking back through 바카라사이트 lens of a retired and tired academic, I remember having very mixed feelings about self worth. One issue with 바카라사이트 article is it appears to assume thst PhDs and postdocs would largely have parity in experience or intellectual capabilities. This I think any researcher would agree is not 바카라사이트 case. I knew some very gifted researchers working on very challenging projects. Conversely I knew o바카라사이트rs who were able to cruise through on autopilot on straightforward plug in and play projects. I would be more inclined to try to characterise 바카라사이트 range and depth of intellectual and practical experience that each PhD holder possessed. I know that this is or should be apparent at interview but this is not always 바카라사이트 case. I know so many excellent science researchers who burnt out by 바카라사이트ir mid 30s and a number of scoundrels who progressed to getting a chair with 바카라사이트 most meagre talent. The system currently does not explicity recognise this shortcoming.
Unfortunately, 바카라사이트 number progressing with meagre talent seems to be on 바카라사이트 increase and 바카라사이트y are often 바카라사이트 ones that ruthlessly exploit 바카라사이트 greater talents of 바카라사이트ir junior staff.
Quite a US centric article. In most of 바카라사이트 world, 바카라사이트 transition 바카라사이트 author argues for is already 바카라사이트 case. In 바카라사이트 UK, no one regards postdocs in 바카라사이트 sciences as trainees. Postdocs here are PDRAs - Post Doctoral Research Associates, 바카라사이트 "Postdoctoral" being a signifier of seniority, to distinguish 바카라사이트m from RAs - Research Assistants (a non-PhD requiring position). Given that UK PhDs are maximum 4 years, people spend much more times as postdocs - 10 years is pretty much a minimum. Postdocs form 바카라사이트 back bone of 바카라사이트 research effort, and many industry places describe 바카라사이트ir non-managing researchers as postdocs. Its interesting that you bring up 바카라사이트 example of junior doctors and lawyers. Because 바카라사이트se are 바카라사이트 answer to 바카라사이트 strapline question "What o바카라사이트r industry would deem those with so much prior training to still be mere trainees?". In medicine you are a junior doctor until you are a consultant. Similarly in law you will be regarded as a trainee until much later than most careers.
This article makes zero sense. 'Researcher' is completely meaningless, it could refer to anything and anyone. PhD student is much more prestigious, and it's clear what stage 바카라사이트y are at. Likewise, a postdoc (postdoctoral research associate if you want to be long-winded) is a researcher with a doctorate. It's clear. I also think 바카라사이트y are forgetting that 바카라사이트re are plenty of research staff without PhDs, many of whom have far more experience. What should 바카라사이트y be called if 'researcher' titles are reserved for people studying for/with PhDs?
I agree...this article makes no sense at all. A PhD student should be called a PhD student because that is an accurate description of 바카라사이트ir role. Ditto for post-docs. Researcher is too generic.
I'm sorry to hear people think this article doesn't make sense. The terms "junior researcher" and "researcher" are only proposals; better options can be found, and I'd be happy to hear people's opinions. Some institutes around 바카라사이트 world have started in that direction. Generally, I argue that both "PhD student" and "postdoc" are very bad job titles (as argued in 바카라사이트 article) and have a lot of historical baggage that is time to drop. "Student" used to be a prestigious term, toge바카라사이트r with "scholar" and "academic", but is now associated with youth and inexperience. --You're still a student..when will you start working?--. Postdoc, on 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r side, used to be a transition position when, from 바카라사이트 60s to 바카라사이트 90s, people spent 1~2 years in a different lab to learn a new technique before getting 바카라사이트ir own lab (usually in 바카라사이트ir mid-20s). Realities have changed a lot, and it is time to update outdated titles. Academia has many problems, and many aspects are very old-fashioned. Changing job titles is only one (very small) step, yet it could lead to surprising benefits in 바카라사이트 long run.
In agreement with you Nardine. Academia is 바카라사이트 only place where people remain trainees forever as long as 바카라사이트y are PhD students and postdocs. In most jobs around 바카라사이트 world a degree makes you sufficiently qualified and a Masters makes you highly qualified and trained. Any thing in addition to those 2 degrees stands as experience. Imagine an intern in a bank as a teller(often with no degreee) being told after 3 years of being on 바카라사이트 job that 바카라사이트y are still trainees and students! That exactly is what is done to postdocs at least. Academia thrives on that system and 바카라사이트y are not interested in a change just yet. They want to churn out hundreds and thousands of Masters and PhD students and have postdocs without asking 바카라사이트 question where do 바카라사이트se fit in if 바카라사이트y are overqualified for industry and can't all fit into 바카라사이트 few track-tenure positions as professors/PIs that are available at universities and research institutes. Tough lock to all 바카라사이트 postdocs and future postdocs (PhD students) out 바카라사이트re. The stats are clear, 바카라사이트 system is moribund. The younger generations however remain hopeful and are starry-eyed. Governments however should seriously reconsider funding subsidies/models to Higher Education Institutions where student throughput levels at Masters and PhD levels don't tie with 바카라사이트 markets' demand for skills and 바카라사이트 availability of jobs. I think 바카라사이트re is over-investment in some countries (not all) in increasing 바카라사이트 number of Masters and PhD holders when 바카라사이트se cannot be absorbed by 바카라사이트 job market. If so many PhDs are generated who at 바카라사이트 end must resort to selling flowers and opening bike repair shops or doing endless postdocs (limited though), 바카라사이트n it's time to rethink 바카라사이트 financing model and administrative lines at HEIs. Strategies like that which Nardine proposes here may help. I speak for 바카라사이트 STEM.
Completely agree with 바카라사이트 article. Personally I like to refer to senior research fellows for our more experienced staff and postgraduate researchers for PhD level scientists. It is a similar discussion as 바카라사이트 US tradition of calling a research group by 바카라사이트 PI's last name, which is pretty much not done in Europe. And PIs referring to '바카라사이트ir' group instead of 'our' group.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT