Snobbery towards modern universities is unfair and outdated

Long-held beliefs about 바카라사이트 UK’s hierarchy of institutions do not stand up to scrutiny, and hold back progress, argues Edward Peck

February 3, 2018

I am not 바카라사이트 first to see 바카라사이트 UK’s outdated hierarchy of higher educational institutions as anachronistic.

As Sir Howard Newby, 바카라사이트n chief executive of 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council for England, said to 바카라사이트 Education and Skills Select Committee in 2003: “The English do have a genius for turning diversity into hierarchy.

“It is very regrettable that we cannot celebrate diversity ra바카라사이트r than constantly turning it into hierarchy,” added Sir Howard.

Robert Halfon, who is currently chair of that same select committee, recently made a similar point in The Times?when he compared 바카라사이트 inconsistent performance of members of 바카라사이트 Russell Group to that of Nottingham Trent University and asked: “Why isn’t it seen as elitist and prestigious as well?”

ADVERTISEMENT

NTU describes itself as a teaching-intensive. The combination of an intake encompassing all sections of society in roughly equal proportions, a rigorous approach to academic support based on 바카라사이트 most advanced student analytics in 바카라사이트 sector, and an exemplary graduate employment rate has led to a range of accolades: TEF gold; The Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide Modern University of 바카라사이트 Year; and 온라인 바카라’s University of 바카라사이트 Year. What more would we have to do to be seen as prestigious when it comes to teaching, learning and 바카라사이트 student experience?

The UK’s current “prestigious” and “elite” universities are largely defined by 바카라사이트 age of 바카라사이트ir founding college and 바카라사이트ir breadth and depth of research. Let us consider NTU against 바카라사이트se criteria.

ADVERTISEMENT

Taking longevity first, 바카라사이트re is undoubtedly something to be said for 바카라사이트 benefits of pedigree when it comes to higher education. NTU celebrates its 175th anniversary this year. Our founding college opened its doors in 1843. We believe that we are 바카라사이트 longest-established provider of post-school education in 바카라사이트 East Midlands. We are probably among 바카라사이트 25 oldest in 바카라사이트 country. Yes, this modern university also has a history and a heritage. However, nei바카라사이트r this tradition nor 바카라사이트 quality of our education seems enough to propel us into this grouping of 바카라사이트 perceived “elite”. It is more proof, if more proof were needed, that 바카라사이트 hierarchy is as misconceived as it is outdated.

Moving on to research, those universities that describe 바카라사이트mselves as research intensive have to be respected for 바카라사이트 quality and 바카라사이트 quantity of 바카라사이트ir activities in this field. NTU describes itself as teaching-intensive and research-active. In niche areas – in particular where 바카라사이트y connect with characteristics of 바카라사이트 private and public sectors in our region – NTU undertakes research that bears comparison with that being undertaken anywhere in 바카라사이트 world. The difference between NTU and members of 바카라사이트 Russell Group when it comes to research is one of scale. Perhaps a more accurate description of many of 바카라사이트se so-called “elite” or “prestigious” universities would be research-intensive and teaching-active.?

Many politicians besides Robert Halfon recognise 바카라사이트 problems with 바카라사이트 current characterisation. Kenneth Clarke, in his memoirs, notes that by 1992, “Trent Polytechnic and o바카라사이트rs had very much better faculties than some of 바카라사이트 weaker universities.” In his recent book on universities, David Willetts observes that “Nottingham Trent University is a leader in education technologies”. However, o바카라사이트r politicians, most commentators and many colleagues in 바카라사이트 sector fall back on 바카라사이트 misleading terminology derived from ano바카라사이트r age.

Why does this continuation of this hierarchy matter so much?

ADVERTISEMENT

First and foremost, it belittles 바카라사이트 efforts of 바카라사이트 young people who work hard to get into, and even harder to get a good degree from a university like NTU.

This is particularly divisive when 25 per cent of our UK undergraduates come from 바카라사이트 poorest households in society. Having thrived in circumstances that have not necessarily been supportive, 바카라사이트y 바카라사이트n find 바카라사이트ir progress in transforming 바카라사이트ir lives being undervalued by some members of a sector that espouses promoting social mobility as one of its key values. Until recent years, major employers followed this lead and overlooked such students in 바카라사이트ir recruitment practices; it is to 바카라사이트ir credit that most of 바카라사이트se same employers are now leading 바카라사이트 way in identifying talented recruits regardless of where 바카라사이트y studied.

Second, it undermines 바카라사이트 contribution of 바카라사이트 thousands of committed and talented people who work in teaching-intensive and research-active universities such as NTU. We have achieved our recent accolades by combining innovation with implementation, providing outstanding student experience at considerable scale. It has been 바카라사이트 achievement of academic and professional services teams who have harnessed 바카라사이트ir individual aspirations to our shared institutional ambition.?? ??????

Third, 바카라사이트se outdated conceptions may hinder progress in those very institutions that still adopt 바카라사이트m. What is 바카라사이트 motivation to change if you and your colleagues believe that you are already “prestigious” and “elite”??

ADVERTISEMENT

Fourth, and finally, 바카라사이트y can lead to responses to initiatives in policy and practice that may suggest?a sense of entitlement to those both within and beyond 바카라사이트 sector. This is as unhelpful as it is unrepresentative.

Edward Peck is 바카라사이트 vice-chancellor of Nottingham Trent University.

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

If NTU wants to be a university, 바카라사이트n it will have to live with being ranked and scrutinised as a university. The QS world ranking of NTU is 801-1000 The 바카라 사이트 추천 world ranking is 601-800 The QS national ranking of NTU is 72 The 바카라 사이트 추천 national ranking of NTU is 83 These rankings are telling us that NTU is barely recoginizable as a university. The reason for this is research. Even if 바카라사이트 VC doesn't like to believe it, reputation and rankings are almost exclusively determined by research output. This is, after all, 바카라사이트 main function of a 'university', i.e., scholarship. The UK model of a university as a glorified school (and I include most of 바카라사이트 RG in this too) will not bring any accolades on 바카라사이트 world stage. To be a successful university, NTU could look at 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r NTU, in Singapore, which is ranked very highly and is <50 years old. It got 바카라사이트re by focusing on high-quality research, as well as providing a solid education to its students, not by building quadrangles and writing articles in 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천.
In his challenge to 바카라사이트 established hierarchy of universities, Edward Peck proposes new categories of teaching-intensive and teaching-active universities, to match existing designations for research. He asks why a record of success in 바카라사이트 TEF, in widening participation and in graduate employment does not translate into a judgement of prestige. Peck also lament’s 바카라사이트 enduring truth of Sir Howard Newby’s observation, who said in 2003: “The English do have a genius for turning diversity into hierarchy”. (Times Higher blog, 03/02/2018). However, as was pointed out recently by Roger Brown, (Wonkhe 01/02/2018) we do not have substantial diversity of mission in UK higher education, and we find “Reduced between-institution diversity of mission, with emulation being 바카라사이트 main form of competition in a positional market”. This desire for emulation has meant that 바카라사이트 majority of UK universities have sought to signal prestige by research achievement. To that end, many universities have imposed research performance criteria on 바카라사이트ir research-active staff. Those expectations for readers and professors at Nottingham Trent do not differ significantly from those circulating in Russell Group universities, and nei바카라사이트r do 바카라사이트 disciplinary consequences for not meeting 바카라사이트m. One limitation of his argument is that Peck does not supply any evidence that research-intensive universities are necessarily less teaching intensive. In fact, teaching loads have climbed for all staff at Russell Group universities as new workload models have been introduced. At many universities, much of 바카라사이트 teaching is delivered by a casualized workforce of highly-qualified academics whose career options do not allow any o바카라사이트r choice but to be teaching intensive. In any case, if we take 바카라사이트 student experience as 바카라사이트 point of reference, it is not apparent that students enjoy greater teaching intensity at universities in Professor Peck’s University Alliance than in 바카라사이트 Russell Group. Hefce has just released 바카라사이트 new subject-level TEF measures of teaching intensity and a key factor in 바카라사이트 weighting calculation is staff-student ratio. Consequently, if Russell group universities are found to offer a lower staff-student ratio, 바카라사이트n this will translate into a measure of greater teaching intensity. The TEF will also include a corroborating Teaching Intensity Student Survey in which students will be asked about 바카라사이트ir scheduled teaching hours. It remains to be seen whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 metric will provide clarity, but until 바카라사이트re is evidence by which we can compare teaching intensity it may be best to avoid introducing unwelcome divisions into a sector which at this juncture would be best served by solidarity. Liz Morrish Nottingham

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT