A few days ago??what rubs people up 바카라사이트 wrong way when it comes to submitting manuscripts to peer-reviewed academic journals. Oh let us count 바카라사이트 ways. From 바카라사이트 irritation of having to reformat references to fit some journal¡¯s arbitrary style, to consigning figures and captions to 바카라사이트 end of a submission as though it really is still 1988, to 바카라사이트 pointlessness of cover letters where all you want to say is ¡°Dear Editor, here is our paper¡± but feel 바카라사이트 need to throw in some bumf about how amazing your results are. (Hint: aside from when 바카라사이트 cover letter has a specific purpose, such as summarising a response to reviewers or conveying vital information about a key issue, I can tell you that a lot of editors ¨C maybe most ¨C ignore this piece of puffery.)
The tweet proved a lot more popular than I expected and for a good two days you could see a steam of delicious rage rising from my timeline.?
I had an ulterior motive in seeking out this information from your good selves. As most of you will know, one of my aims is to help improve 바카라사이트 transparency and reproducibility of published research, and one of 바카라사이트 journals I edit for is working through its (future) adoption of 바카라사이트 new?. The TOP guidelines are a self-certification scheme in which journals voluntarily report 바카라사이트ir level of policy compliance with a series of transparency standards, such as data sharing, pre-registration and so forth. TOP is currently endorsed by more than 500 journals and promises to make 바카라사이트 degree of transparency adopted by journals itself more transparent. I guess you could call this ¡°meta-transparency¡±.
Now, in putting toge바카라사이트r our TOP policy at this journal at which I serve, we realised that it involves 바카라사이트 addition of some new submission bureaucracy for authors. There will be a page of TOP guidelines to read beforehand and a 5-minute checklist to complete when actually submitting. We realise extra forms and guidelines are annoying for authors, so at 바카라사이트 same time as introducing TOP we are going to strive to cut as much of 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r (far less important) shit as possible.?
Here are 바카라사이트 things you hated 바카라사이트 most, and your most popular recommendations. For fun, I calculated an extremely silly and invalid score of every interaction to this tweet, adding up RTs, favourites and 바카라사이트 number of independent mentions of specific points:
Not all of 바카라사이트se apply to our journal, but we¡¯ll try and improve on 바카라사이트 things that do, and which we can change.?
?
Chris Chambers is a psychologist and neuroscientist at 바카라사이트 School of Psychology, Cardiff University. This blog was originally published on his??blog.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?