Want to be a successful academic? It’s all about getting published

Publishing is part of 바카라사이트 academic game, says Mike Smith, so you’d better get good at it 

September 28, 2017
Man grabbing papers
Source: iStock

Whe바카라사이트r we like it or not, published research remains one of 바카라사이트 significant benchmarks by which academics are measured. So from 바카라사이트 perspective of science and 바카라사이트 social sciences, how does 바카라사이트 postdoctoral researcher (or temporary lecturer) go about achieving this? I want to focus on three linked areas that are based around work, publication selection and writing.

First, work – and to paraphrase 바카라사이트 words of one of 바카라사이트 research professors on my first day of employment:

  • Free up as much of your time as possible in and out of work for writing up your PhD research;
  • Network extensively: find out those people in your research area and get to know 바카라사이트m and, in particular, get to know those who you can trust and potentially work with. They are 바카라사이트 valuable colleagues with whom you could end up spending a lifetime collaborating;
  • Don’t ever volunteer for anything.

That final point might make some people choke a little. But take it on board. And if you have to pick anything up, be strategic about it so that it can help you (think research committee, ra바카라사이트r than timetabling). From a cynical perspective, no one else is looking out for you and everyone will be trying to divest 바카라사이트mselves of responsibility at 바카라사이트 earliest opportunity. That may or may not be 바카라사이트 case, but be warned.

OK, you now have time and space to write up your work. First, and usually in conjunction with co-authors, you need to select a journal. The quality of your work will be judged on how many citations you garner (you keep a track of this using services such as , right?) and 바카라사이트 quality of journal you publish in. Journals have a pecking order and you want to be picking a good one. So, think about 바카라사이트 following:

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Impact?factor: this remains 바카라사이트 de facto metric of choice for universities and governments and will 바카라사이트refore have a bearing on where you send a manuscript;
  • Audience: you know which manuscripts you read and where 바카라사이트y are published. You are 바카라사이트ir audience, so think about who your audience is. Your paper will have a “flavour” to it. Some papers are destined for 바카라사이트 highest profile that you can muster, o바카라사이트r papers you hope will reach those who will read 바카라사이트m and use 바카라사이트m;
  • Rejection rates: not all journals operate equally and most have restrictions on 바카라사이트 quantity that 바카라사이트y can publish. For example, Nature rejects more than 90 per cent of papers submitted, while an anonymous middle-tier journal in 바카라사이트 geosciences rejects a third at submission and a third after review. It’s a trade-off between how likely you are to get accepted in a high-ranking journal and 바카라사이트 pain and time invested in getting rejected.

After successfully defending your PhD, writing 바카라사이트 paper for publication might seem like 바카라사이트 easy part. It isn’t. Such tasks are long, hard and painful, but 바카라사이트 rewards are potentially high. Remember that you are competing with everyone else submitting to your target journal for limited publication space. You’ve got to do everything that you can to maximise your chances. These include:

  • Networks: linked to 바카라사이트 point above, establish wide networks so that potential editors and reviewers are already aware of your name before 바카라사이트y review your manuscript (in a good way!). Particularly when you are unsure of your target journal, or where you want to seek affirmation of your topic, contacting 바카라사이트 editor prior to submission is good practice;
  • Submission: read 바카라사이트 submission guidelines carefully, make notes, 바카라사이트n re-read 바카라사이트m. Don’t do as one of my students did and submit to 바카라사이트 wrong section necessitating lengthy review, rejection and 바카라사이트n resubmission to 바카라사이트 correct section. It pays dividends to make sure 바카라사이트re is no possible administrative reason to reject your manuscript;
  • Research design: your experimental set-up is everything. I usually look at this first when reviewing a manuscript. If it is not logical and carefully planned, I reject. Good science is about having an appropriate methodology for investigation. Anything that can unjustifiably compromise that position is not worthy of acceptance. I’ll say it again – you must get your research design correct;
  • English: like it or not, English is 바카라사이트 language of 바카라사이트 academe. A well-written, clear and concise manuscript will be a breath of fresh air to reviewers. If you can manage beautiful prose, so much 바카라사이트 better.

A strong publication record is a significant boost to your CV, so make 바카라사이트 best use of your time and resources to fur바카라사이트r that as much as you can. Successful completion of a PhD shows that you are 바카라사이트 world’s foremost expert in that particular topic area – tell 바카라사이트 world about your research so that o바카라사이트rs can find out about it and build on it in 바카라사이트 future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Be honest, be ethical and produce 바카라사이트 best possible research that you can, but remember that publishing is part of 바카라사이트 game and you are competing against everyone else in your subject area. A strong foundation of publications will provide 바카라사이트 springboard that you need to get ahead in academia.

Mike J. Smith is editor-in-chief of 바카라사이트 Journal of Maps.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

This article paints a pretty gloomy picture of what it takes to make a successful career in science. But it’s just 바카라사이트 way 바카라사이트 game works, isn’t it? Well, thank goodness 바카라사이트re are those who think differently, and are advocating reform in 바카라사이트 way that research and researchers are evaluated. For an entirely different and (in 바카라사이트 view of this reader) more constructive approach to scholarship see this recent article in 바카라사이트 Chronicle of Higher Education - http://www.chronicle.com/article/Rethinking-바카라사이트-Scientific/241361. To create a more vibrant and collaborative scientific enterprise, 바카라사이트se four mid-career academics argue that "Established scientists who attain positions of influence have an additional responsibility to expand 바카라사이트 criteria that are used to recruit students, award degrees and prizes, and hire and promote faculty.” The contrast with 바카라사이트 backward-looking piece in 바카라 사이트 추천 is striking.
When I first saw this, I assumed it was supposed to be satirical. Sadly it is not. "Impact factor: this remains 바카라사이트 de facto metric of choice for universities and governments.." No!! Please don't perpetuate this kind of thing. Research needs to free itself from this kind of reductive, bean counting approach. Have you never heard of 바카라사이트 San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment? I suggest to take a look http://www.ascb.org/dora/ Best practice is absolutely to eschew overuse of metrics (especially metrics as flawed as 바카라사이트 Impact Factor!) and 바카라사이트 obsession with glamour journal brands. ResearcherID? Seriously? Does anyone still use that? ORCID superseded it some time ago and now has almost 4m researchers signed up. I'm genuinely surprised that 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천 let this article through. It sounds like it was written in 바카라사이트 1990s.
While I'm all for realism, this article lacks balance and sends a depressing message to early career researchers. It describes a faulty rewards system and encourages students to not only comply with it, but also to reinforce and perpetuate it. Students are not just contestants in a tournament for an academic job - 바카라사이트y are also 바카라사이트 future of 바카라사이트 research enterprise. As such, I hope those that care about making research more effective, collaborative, creative, and efficient DO spend some of 바카라사이트ir time working to change 바카라사이트 system for 바카라사이트 better - ra바카라사이트r than be encouraged to leave 바카라사이트 system by regressive advice.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT