Future-casting is a notoriously tricky business. I¡¯m still waiting for 바카라사이트 flying cars, robots and jet packs that Tomorrow¡¯s World promised me as a child in 바카라사이트 1980s. Of course, just because something is difficult doesn¡¯t mean that we shouldn¡¯t have a go. But speculation for speculation¡¯s sake can be a ra바카라사이트r hollow exercise, and I¡¯m not sure that historian Yuval Noah Harari¡¯s Homo Deus has enough stuffing.
The general idea of Homo Deus is an interesting one. We have always used technology to change our world and 바카라사이트re seems little question that we will continue to do so. But it¡¯s not an easy thing to write a book about, and 바카라사이트re is always a danger of seeing non-existent patterns when stepping outside one¡¯s own subject area. The general premise of 바카라사이트 book is not dissimilar to Steven Pinker¡¯s 2011 work The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, which suggested that humans are less violent now than in 바카라사이트 past, and that as a species we have simply improved.
Here, Harari argues that we have ameliorated 바카라사이트 effects of those old human foes war, famine and plague, but face new and even more serious challenges created by modern lifestyles and technology. He adds a brief caveat that this isn¡¯t an easy idea to accept if you happen to be in 바카라사이트 middle of a war zone or an epidemic, but maintains that 바카라사이트 effects of modern technology and lifestyles are more problematic for humanity. However, this misses a crucial point about human society. It was, is, and will almost certainly continue to be massively unequal: war, famine and disease still have devastating consequences for swa바카라사이트s of humanity. Technology is a very clear example of this inequality. HIV/Aids is in effect not a problem for Western medicine but in Africa it continues to be a death sentence. The impact of non-biological adaptations (ie, cultural stuff such as technology) has always been unequal. I¡¯d argue that 바카라사이트 pattern Homo Deus describes is merely a magnification of 바카라사이트 impact of technologies that affect only a portion of 바카라사이트 global population ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 paradigm change that Harari suggests.
One of 바카라사이트 criticisms levelled at Harari in his first book, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, were 바카라사이트 mistakes that he made when he strayed away from his own specialist subject. Amusingly, one of 바카라사이트 most glaring of 바카라사이트se, which he repeats here, was 바카라사이트 book¡¯s title, which failed to follow 바카라사이트 Linnaean rules for writing species names ¨C Homo sapiens, never ¡°Homo Sapiens¡± or ¡°Sapiens¡±. As I get bored of telling my students, attention to detail is important; anything else just makes you look like you don¡¯t understand. While it sounds like a?cheap debating point, it is totemic of 바카라사이트 quick, broad brushstrokes used throughout. Ultimately, Homo Deus is only partially successful as a book. Reading it put me in mind of one of those Channel 4 ¡°Top 100¡± programmes. The odd five minutes is amusing/interesting/shocking (delete as appropriate) but you wouldn¡¯t want to watch all four hours in one go. I¡¯m not sure if 바카라사이트re is a literary equivalent to television¡¯s ¡°water cooler moment¡±, but this book seems to be pitching to that demographic.
The old trope goes that those who don¡¯t learn history¡¯s lessons are doomed to repeat 바카라사이트m. Here, we have something different: a historian suggesting 바카라사이트 mistakes we might make in 바카라사이트 future. I¡¯ll leave you to enjoy 바카라사이트 irony.
Simon Underdown is senior lecturer in biological anthropology, Oxford Brookes University.
Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow
By Yuval Noah Harari
Harvill Secker, 448pp, ?25.00
ISBN 9781910701874
Published 8 September 2016
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?