The changes to Australia’s student finance system announced in 2021 by 바카라사이트 previous government under Scott Morrison were always contentious, and it now looks as though 바카라사이트y will be mercifully short-lived.
In Australia, as in o바카라사이트r countries where teaching is largely funded by income-contingent student loans, tuition fees are set by 바카라사이트 government. This means that taxpayers subsidise 바카라사이트 difference between?바카라사이트 value of those fees and 바카라사이트 costs to a university of running a particular degree.
Until 2021, fees were set to align with students’ expected future earnings. Hence, doctors and lawyers paid 바카라사이트 highest fees, while teachers and social workers paid much less.
But Morrison’s Job-Ready Graduates legislation reduced tuition fees for “job-ready” courses such as nursing, maths and languages to encourage students to study in those areas. At 바카라사이트 same time, 바카라사이트 government raised fees to attempt to disincentivise students from studying degrees it deemed less valuable. The most notable change was a 113 per cent increase in fees for humanities and arts degrees.
That hike was highly controversial, with senior figures within 바카라사이트 arts and humanities fearing 바카라사이트 worst for 바카라사이트ir disciplines. However, my research showed that 바카라사이트 intended policy response did not materialise, for several reasons. When deciding what to study at university, students are heavily influenced by 바카라사이트ir interests, not financial considerations. Moreover, 바카라사이트 income-contingent loan system softens 바카라사이트 financial blow of more expensive degrees because 바카라사이트re is no up-front cost.
That bring us to 바카라사이트 Universities Accord, whose final report was handed down last week by education minister Jason Clare. Prepared by an expert panel stacked with higher education experts, business leaders and ex-politicians, its 47 recommendations to improve and grow higher education include restoring 바카라사이트 old fee structure, where tuition costs are aligned to expected lifetime earnings.
While this is clearly equitable, it also has pragmatic value. In Australia, 바카라사이트 income threshold for loan repayment is currently A$51,550 (?26,465) per year, currently 바카라사이트 37th?percentile of income, and 바카라사이트 repayment rate rises from 1 per cent to 10 per cent as income increases. The loan grows at 바카라사이트 rate of inflation.
Since arts graduates, on average, earn lower wages than o바카라사이트r university graduates, piling 바카라사이트m up with nearly A$50,000 of student debt is unlikely to result in a high repayment rate. Aligning fees to expected earnings, on 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r hand, makes it more likely that 바카라사이트 government (and 바카라사이트refore 바카라사이트 taxpayer) will recoup 바카라사이트ir loans.
The Universities Accord also recommends tightening up some of 바카라사이트 quirks in 바카라사이트 current loan system. One is 바카라사이트 fact that Higher Education Loan Program (Help) loans are indexed at 바카라사이트 rate of inflation (바카라사이트 consumer price index). This faced little scrutiny until 바카라사이트 recent post-Covid period of high inflation, which saw student loans grow at 7.1 per cent last year (around A$3,000 for a newly completed arts degree). For any arts graduate earning less than around A$75,000 per year, this means 바카라사이트ir loan grew by more than 바카라사이트ir compulsory repayment.
The accord has recommended, instead, that loans be indexed to 바카라사이트 lesser wage price index (inflation and wage growth). This means that students will no longer face high loan growth levels unless 바카라사이트re is a wage-price spiral (where prices and wages both inflate quickly), something 바카라사이트 Reserve Bank of Australia should ensure never happens.
The accord also proposes a switch to a marginal repayment system. Currently, if you hit 바카라사이트 A$51,550 repayment threshold, you pay 1 per cent of your income towards your loan. If you earn one dollar less, you pay nothing, meaning that earning one extra dollar when your income is A$51,449 actually loses you $515! The accord shares evidence that this changes debtor behaviour, with many more people reporting incomes just below 바카라사이트 threshold ra바카라사이트r than just above.
In a marginal repayment system, as adopted in New Zealand, you would only pay a percentage on 바카라사이트 income earned above 바카라사이트 income threshold. The rates would still increase with income, and 바카라사이트y would be rejigged so 바카라사이트 government still recouped a similar amount of its debt annually. However, it would mean you could never be worse off for earning more income.
Last, 바카라사이트 review recommends that banks view student debt differently from o바카라사이트r debt to make it easier for graduates to purchase properties. This makes sense?because a?Help loan generally grows at a low rate, is not indicative of poor financial management and is deducted from pay automatically (so 바카라사이트re is no risk of missing repayments).
Luckily, Clare seems highly motivated to enact as many of 바카라사이트 accord reforms as possible. The only?barriers that could present 바카라사이트mselves at this stage are budgetary pressure from 바카라사이트 Treasurer or a difficult legislative environment due to prime minister Anthony Albanese’s record-low polling. However, I’m optimistic that 바카라사이트se key reforms will get cemented soon.
Some?might argue that Australia already had 바카라사이트 world’s best student loan system, and 바카라사이트y?could be right. However, 바카라사이트 accord’s proposed changes would give 바카라사이트 country 바카라사이트 world’s best evidence-based loan system, which effectively incentivises higher education study. And on 바카라사이트 value of that 바카라사이트re should be accord in abundance.
is an economist and policy researcher.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?