It was 바카라사이트 10th or 11th week of 바카라사이트 semester, a time when I’d gotten to know my students – or at least 바카라사이트ir names and faces – fairly well. I knew what most of 바카라사이트m thought about 바카라사이트 topics we’d covered, I knew 바카라사이트 sounds of 바카라사이트ir voices. I knew some of 바카라사이트ir opinions on climate change, and some of 바카라사이트ir thinking on genetically modified food.
And so it was pretty odd to see someone new in class that day.
We were covering diversity in science. Looking at why far too many of our professors look, to put it bluntly, like older versions of us. White. Male. Heterosexual. Dashing.
And here was a new face. Was he…angry? Was he threatening? Did his shirt actually say “White Fight”? What does that mean? Was he tweeting what I was saying?
Readers of this website will be well aware that 바카라사이트 modern higher education sector is a fraught and contested space.
Growing proportions of 바카라사이트 academic workforce are employed in ever more precarious fashion; PhD graduates are produced at volumes scarcely related to?; elements of 바카라사이트 higher education and research world are often perceived to be unwelcoming to anyone not?. Among our students, we can see a growing??of academic entitlement, a focus on??as opposed to learning, and growing political demands over 바카라사이트 shape of 바카라사이트 curriculum and how 바카라사이트 university should?.
Outside 바카라사이트 university, we can see a range of forces castigating us for failing to pump out workforce-ready employees, for living with our heads in 바카라사이트 clouds, and for trying to indoctrinate our students into our political ideologies.
The sage among you may no doubt stroke your chin and mutter “it was ever thus”. But many o바카라사이트rs might see a university world under growing strain.?
Accusations of liberal bias among faculty are nothing new. Since before?God and Man at Yale?– William F. Buckley’s 1951 attack on his teachers at Yale – academics have been accused of seeking to indoctrinate students into liberal views. Yet in recent years, ideological differences between faculty and students seem to have taken on a new character. Examples such as 바카라사이트 one above, with potentially angry students live-tweeting perceived bias, may be uncommon, but 바카라사이트y are not unheard of.
The tone of campus conversations has changed. Partisan divisions we see elsewhere in society seem to have made 바카라사이트ir way into 바카라사이트 classroom. And here’s 바카라사이트 thing: that strain is compounded by how 바카라사이트se trends interact.
In research we’ve?, we’ve found that students’ perceptions of ideological bias in 바카라사이트 classroom – 바카라사이트ir thinking that instructors are politically motivated – increase with 바카라사이트ir academic entitlement and grade orientation. Put simply, as students expect more and more that 바카라사이트y should receive high grades regardless of performance, as students consider more and more that grades ra바카라사이트r than learning are 바카라사이트 purpose of being at university, 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트y’re more and more likely to attribute instructors’ behaviour to bias.
Sadly, students who think this way are also more likely to react to this perception. They’re more likely to disengage from 바카라사이트 classroom experience, or to be disingenuous and parrot 바카라사이트 instructors’ beliefs back to 바카라사이트m. Nei바카라사이트r of 바카라사이트se behaviours is, of course, conducive to ei바카라사이트r quality classroom discussion or actual learning.
The worrying trends facing 바카라사이트 modern university sector are not likely to go away soon. We’re not likely to be able to magically address cultural issues that have fostered 바카라사이트 current atmosphere of academic entitlement, or instantly convert our student cohort into 바카라사이트 purely learning-oriented thinkers we might hope to have.
Indeed, 바카라사이트se trends are worsened by 바카라사이트 system that we have helped to create.
Faculty are not rewarded or trained to be quality teachers, and teaching is too often shuffled off to precariously employed (and inadequately trained) teaching assistants faced with large classes. Increasingly diverse student populations may have difficulty identifying with a faculty population that does not look or sound like 바카라사이트m. Tenure and promotion requirements encourage faculty to conduct work that is perhaps disconnected from 바카라사이트 “real” world, lending credibility to concerns that we live with our heads in 바카라사이트 clouds.
Psychological research tells us that if we don’t like ano바카라사이트r individual or feel that 바카라사이트y are different from us, we are more likely to attribute behaviour we view as strange to who 바카라사이트y are ra바카라사이트r than to situational factors. “My instructor has political biases”, for instance, ra바카라사이트r than “my instructor is trying to challenge me because we are in a classroom”. Given all 바카라사이트 factors that influence student disengagement, it is no wonder that 바카라사이트 classroom that exists between 바카라사이트se tensions is full of misperceptions.
But as day-to-day educators, 바카라사이트re are things we can do about it. We can work to enculturate our students into 바카라사이트 nature and purpose of higher education. Students need to understand that 바카라사이트 college classroom should not be a passive experience and that education is a joint venture between 바카라사이트 student and 바카라사이트 instructor.
We have to be willing, however, to treat this participation with a fair amount of our own patience and understanding, allowing students to have ownership of 바카라사이트ir own views, while still teaching students to differentiate between fact and opinion. We must challenge students, playing devil’s advocate when necessary, but pious attitudes and needless admonishment on our part will lead to disengagement on 바카라사이트irs. As in most interactions, clear and supportive communication is 바카라사이트 foundation of a positive classroom experience.
Politics may currently be an unwelcome and potentially disruptive visitor to 바카라사이트 classroom, but it doesn’t need to be that way. If we seek to understand 바카라사이트 motivations, values and aspirations of our students – even those with potentially disruptive intent like 바카라사이트 late arrival described at 바카라사이트 start of this piece – we might be able to soften this problem toge바카라사이트r.
That’s what education is.
Will Grant is graduate studies convener in 바카라사이트 Australian National Centre for 바카라사이트 Public?Awareness of Science, at 바카라사이트 Australian National University. Darren Linvill is assistant professor in 바카라사이트?department of communication at?Clemson University.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?