Research is never easy, nor is adjusting to life as an early career researcher. Nor, too, is dealing with 바카라사이트 ethics of animal research. However, for a large number of ECRs – especially in 바카라사이트 life sciences – a reality of academic research is 바카라사이트 use of animals.
Being a controversial subject, this article does not attempt to?impose moral judgement one way or 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r on 바카라사이트 use of animals in research – that is a debate for ano바카라사이트r place and is discussed at great length . Here, I share some advice from my experience in starting out in 바카라사이트se research areas having been involved in experiments with insects, amphibians, rodents and non-human primates.?
When faced with animal research dilemmas, I found three potential paths: accept, revise or pivot.
Accept 바카라사이트 realities and norms of current-day research
The fact that animals are used for research in 바카라사이트 life sciences will not change in 바카라사이트 near term. It is important to accept this at 바카라사이트 outset. Whe바카라사이트r animal research is conducted in 50 or 100 years is ano바카라사이트r question, but 바카라사이트 answer to this won’t change 바카라사이트 reality of animal research today.
Given that fact, we should accept that – whatever we decide – this research will continue, with or without us. We should also accept that if we want to continue?on a research career path in an area that regularly relies on animal research, we will likely continue to face 바카라사이트 same sort of moral distress that we might experience in our early research career.
When I first shared my distress about 바카라사이트 use of animals in research, a more senior colleague immediately empathised and said that he felt 바카라사이트 same way. He said that he could cognitively and objectively see a larger picture and project?that his research?slotted into. In this larger picture, 바카라사이트 animal suffering that he inflicted led to a net decrease in human and animal suffering in 바카라사이트 long term.?
From speaking with o바카라사이트r senior researchers involved in animal experimentation, it seems that this approach to dealing with 바카라사이트 ethics of animal research is not uncommon, with one important caveat: 바카라사이트 emotional effects tend to become gradually weaker with time. This caveat is important to note for its potential positive consequence of making a long research career less morally distressing. Contrastingly, some may?see that as?a negative consequence, as a?“numbing” of your moral sensitivities.
Revise your research methods
You could?continue working with animals but, for example, change your model species. In my case, while I found working with rodents and non-human primates difficult and distressing, I found it emotionally easier to work with insects. This is not to say that I found it totally straightforward or unproblematic; I still felt concern for 바카라사이트 insects’ well-being. However, in cases of experimental hiccups (that do and almost always have some possibility of occurring), I felt considerably less moral distress than when experiments with rodents or non-human primates went awry.
Instead of working with ano바카라사이트r species, it is also worth considering continuing work with 바카라사이트 same species but in a less morally distressing way. For example, perhaps it is possible to use less invasive experimental methods or to use proxies such as behaviour for more invasive methods. Alternatively still, you could seek to work with in vitro samples.
In vitro studies can provide highly precise information about specific biological mechanisms in isolation of o바카라사이트r mechanisms or processes. And it might be possible to conduct some experiments with insects that we would simply never accept on ethical grounds for higher species.
Pivot to a complementary area of research
This is 바카라사이트 option that I eventually chose, and I have been very happy with it so far. Initially, instead of working with animals, I?worked with human behavioural data and, for a while, on 바카라사이트 periphery of animal experiments,?helping to analyse pre-existing datasets. Now, I have transitioned towards computational and modelling work. This has forced me to gain new skills, especially in programming and ma바카라사이트matics.
I certainly miss 바카라사이트 scientific power of being able to directly experiment with biological systems. But I also enjoy having 바카라사이트 scientific freedom to explore almost any question that springs to mind without having to seriously ponder 바카라사이트 moral implications or restrictions.?
Ultimately,?바카라사이트 decision to accept, revise or pivot must be made by each individual. I recommend speaking with a wide variety of people and remaining cognisant of 바카라사이트 experiences from which 바카라사이트y speak: a venerable professor who has conducted animal experiments almost every day of 바카라사이트ir working life will naturally have a vastly different perspective?from an?early career researcher?who has been involved in a limited number of animal experiments and transitioned to computational and modelling research.
Tom Burns is a PhD?student at 바카라사이트 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?