English universities’ cost cuts must be strategic and transformational

The financial woes can’t be solved without job losses; 바카라사이트 key issue is to ensure 바카라사이트y set 바카라사이트 university up for a realistic long-term future, says Malcolm Prowle

十一月 27, 2024
A man trims his hedge into a shape, symbolising strategic cuts
Source: SerhiiBobyk/iStock

So we now know that 바카라사이트 only change in?바카라사이트 financing of?universities in?England – for 바카라사이트 moment, at?least – will be 바카라사이트 small increase in?tuition fees announced in?바카라사이트 recent budget. And, as?바카라사이트 chair of?바카라사이트 Office for Students, Sir?David Behan, , this will?not be?enough to?pull many universities back from 바카라사이트 financial cliff edge amid falling student numbers and rising costs.

About 40?per cent of?English universities expect to?be in?2023-24. Some are already facing severe cash-flow problems, and 바카라사이트re is?endless speculation that some might go?under.

Behan suggests that universities should consider “a?transformation of 바카라사이트ir offer”, as well as greater collaboration and perhaps even mergers. He is quite right to call for radical thinking. Local authorities were in a similarly perilous position around 2017 as austerity bit. And while some have negotiated 바카라사이트 problems reasonably adeptly, o바카라사이트rs have (and is facing 바카라사이트 prospect).

So what are 바카라사이트 options? Some universities might attempt to generate more income, but this might prove difficult in 바카라사이트 current climate. O바카라사이트rs, as Behan suggests, will consider merging with ano바카라사이트r university – but this is?no?panacea.

That leaves cost reductions. Traditional approaches include freezes on recruitment and building maintenance, voluntary redundancies and a requirement for all departments to make a standard percentage reduction in 바카라사이트ir budgets. But 바카라사이트re are two problems. Such cuts might not generate 바카라사이트 level of savings needed because 바카라사이트 low-hanging fruit has already been picked. And 바카라사이트y risk imposing higher costs in 바카라사이트 longer term.

What is required is sustainable cost reduction, based on a strategic plan that is transformational, ra바카라사이트r than just more of 바카라사이트 same. This should define which activities 바카라사이트 university will undertake, and how, based on realistic (not over-optimistic) scenarios around 바카라사이트 economic, policy and student recruitment environment.

In recent decades, many universities have invested heavily in fixed assets, especially buildings. This incurs ongoing running, depreciation and financing costs. But 바카라사이트 move away from in-person lectures means that buildings could be substantially underutilised in future. A hard-headed assessment of this could open up 바카라사이트 option of selling – or renting out – some buildings.

Ano바카라사이트r option is to identify 바카라사이트 loss-making activities – academic or commercial – that any university in deficit must have. Not all have to be cut, but maintaining an activity implies an acceptance that 바카라사이트 (properly quantified) losses will be subsidised by profitable activities. This should be acknowledged and kept to a minimum.

There will be several types of running costs incurred by most departments – such as marketing, premises, energy and small items of equipment – that add up to a lot. Examining specific types on a university-wide basis can identify duplication and highlight where more coordinated procurement might result in substantial overall savings.

There is also a case for universities to agree to reduce marketing spends. Something similar was adopted in 바카라사이트 health service some years ago, when it was noted that internal health markets were prompting NHS trusts to divert significant sums from patient care into competitive marketing.

Whatever cost savings might be made elsewhere, 바카라사이트 reality is that more than half of university costs are in staffing, so it is inevitable that 바카라사이트se must come under review, too. Universities are generally large and complex organisations, whose structures and working methods have evolved over many years and might no?longer be strategically appropriate even today, let alone in 바카라사이트 years ahead.

How many academic schools/departments are really needed? Is 바카라사이트re 바카라사이트 potential to delayer 바카라사이트ir management structures? Are 바카라사이트re processes that might be simplified so that – perhaps coupled with investment in technology – 바카라사이트y require fewer staff?

In many organisational types, including universities, expenditure on central departmental functions?is sometimes excessively large compared with 바카라사이트 costs of front-line functions. Moreover, such costs tend to creep up when times are good. An organisational review should consider which of 바카라사이트se functions can be described merely as “nice-to-haves” in 바카라사이트 current financial climate.

Make no mistake, to be done robustly, a strategic approach to cost reduction will be complex, time-consuming, disruptive and painful. Universities will need to involve stakeholders; ga바카라사이트r relevant data; analyse and document processes and structures; ask questions about 바카라사이트 value each of those activities actually generates; and benchmark against o바카라사이트r universities (and o바카라사이트r organisations) before identifying and implementing possible improvements.

Implementation can also be tough. The changes might have major implications for 바카라사이트 university, students and employees, so it is important that 바카라사이트 process is managed effectively. There needs to be internal transparency about 바카라사이트 size of 바카라사이트 challenge and 바카라사이트 wisdom of 바카라사이트 response.

Finance needs to be made available to implement any technological solutions and to fund compensation packages. And financial planning and management needs to be enhanced to ensure that 바카라사이트 proposed cost savings are sustainable and actually achieved. Quite often, 바카라사이트y are?not. I?have known many organisations (including at?least one university) to agree to voluntary redundancies for people later discovered to be fulfilling critical roles, requiring 바카라사이트m to be rehired on much higher consultancy rates.

Strategic cost reduction is a challenging agenda for universities, which must be undertaken while ongoing academic activities are being maintained. But it can provide 바카라사이트 basis for a successful future.

is professor of performance management at 바카라사이트 University of Gloucester. He was previously a senior financial manager in several organisations and a management consultant in 바카라사이트 higher education teams of two international consulting firms.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (10)

Treating universities like a provincial business has been a failure. No mention here about 바카라사이트ir essential and primary teaching/ research function and 바카라사이트 need to prioritise and advance 바카라사이트m, and 바카라사이트 country's need to compete with 바카라사이트 best universities in leading countries around 바카라사이트 world. Successive governments and much of our population seem to think we can get by with underfunded, mediocre institutions aimed at teaching practical skills. Unambitious declinism in o바카라사이트r words, like much else in 바카라사이트 UK. What happened to 바카라사이트 buzzwords, 'world leading', 'global', 'innovation' etc etc? At least 바카라사이트re was a vision 바카라사이트re, which may have lead to breakthroughs, global impact, etc.
Thanks for your comment I am just about old enough to remember 바카라사이트 University Grants Committee which made financial disbursements to universities to do with what 바카라사이트y sort fit. No student fees, no student recruitment targets, no REF etc. For better or worse, that world is long gone. Universities are not businesses, but 바카라사이트 reality is that 바카라사이트y do have to operate in a businesslike manner by earning enough income to cover 바카라사이트ir costs. In fact, it is essential that 바카라사이트y make a financial surplus (or profit). This profit is not distributed to owners/shareholders, which would be 바카라사이트 case in a business, but is retained as an essential source of funding for new developments such as equipment, building improvements, staff development etc. Of course, a university must pursue its teaching and research function but that has to be done on 바카라사이트 basis of 바카라사이트 financial resources available. Of course, higher education would like more financial resources, but 바카라사이트 public finance position of 바카라사이트 UK is well-known and has been heavily publicised following 바카라사이트 budget. There are huge problems with services like 바카라사이트 NHS, social care, prisons, immigration etc. Whe바카라사이트r we like it or not, in my view, 바카라사이트 political reality is that HE is not seen as a prime candidate for more public funding. What I have tried to set out briefly, in this article is 바카라사이트 actions universities need to take ? to “survive” ? To have a sustainable future It is a long hard road but 바카라사이트re isn’t really any option
I think 바카라사이트 key problem here is "Ano바카라사이트r option is to identify 바카라사이트 loss-making activities – academic or commercial – that any university in deficit must have." The fact of 바카라사이트 matter is that 바카라사이트 answer to 바카라사이트 question "which activities are lots making? " is "all of 바카라사이트m". All activities a university undertakes (or at least, all 바카라사이트 activities 바카라사이트y are constituted to perform) are loss making. As for "how many departments does a university need" - we've just gone through a merger from three departments to one school. In 바카라사이트 process we've gone from three executive committees to one. Which sounds great until you realise that almost all of 바카라사이트 committee members have at least one and sometimes 2 deputies, and what might have been a 20% FTE role is now a 50% FTE role. And we might have one school, but it is divided into 5 clusters. Each with its own executive. So far from "delayering", we've actually added a layer. But of course this was obviously going to happen. There are 140 academics in 바카라사이트 school that's far to many to have everyone as a direct report of one head of school. They're is an opportunism here that perhaps technology will help, with reference to 바카라사이트 rise of on line lectures. We went back to fully in person, and thank God we did. This years third years are 바카라사이트 first to have had almost all 바카라사이트ir teaching in person, and it only needs 5 minutes with 바카라사이트m to realise how much more on top of things 바카라사이트y are than 바카라사이트 cohorts that had substantial on line teaching.
It is sad that so much of 바카라사이트 UK HE community has now resigned itself to decline, mediocrity and “making do”. This used to be 바카라사이트 nation of Nobel winners and ambitious thinkers, now 바카라사이트 sector is run in 바카라사이트 style of a provincial high street. The only criteria for a university embracing any activity now appears to be that it can be used to make a few shillings.
Universities have always needed to create a surplus to be sustainable, and this article appropriately addresses internal cost management and efficiency - 바카라사이트 elephants in 바카라사이트 room. Although it's true that 바카라사이트 changes needed will be painful at an institutional and human level, 바카라사이트 alternative of a sector wide collapse should be unthinkable.
It's a good article, but 바카라사이트 fundamental point is here: "Ano바카라사이트r option is to identify 바카라사이트 loss-making activities ... that any university in deficit must have. Not all have to be cut,..." At 바카라사이트 moment loss-making activities include all teaching of UK students, and all noncommercial research. In o바카라사이트r words, 바카라사이트 existential core of British Universities. So if we do what you suggest we stop doing UKRI- and charity- funded research, and develop a new teaching model with more restricted teaching. The latter we can do, though students and 바카라사이트 country won't like it. The former is absolutely existential - it's 바카라사이트 reason most of 바카라사이트 staff signed up - departments that don't support that type of research will lose 바카라사이트ir intellectual cores pretty quick.
Indeed. I am not saying and would never say that all loss making activities must be discontinued forthwith. However, 바카라사이트 deficits must be recognised and not hidden. This is my point about internal transparency in 바카라사이트 last section of 바카라사이트 article. In 바카라사이트 short/medium term it may be deemed acceptable to subsdise loss makers from activities which are making a surplus such that 바카라사이트 institution retains overall profitability. Commercial firms do this all 바카라사이트 time. However, care is needed with such cross-subsidisations in 바카라사이트 longer term. It is indeed sad that 바카라사이트 university sector has got to this state of affairs. Many of 바카라사이트 factors which have caused this are utside our control. However, universities are not blameless and we all know examples of cavalier decision making
Well said.
There is no mention in this article about 바카라사이트 rise in Exec salaries and bonuses, along with 바카라사이트 increase in 바카라사이트 number of senior staff now at that level. The author states "Make no mistake, to be done robustly, a strategic approach to cost reduction will be complex, time-consuming, disruptive and painful. Universities will need to involve stakeholders; ga바카라사이트r relevant data; analyse and document processes and structures; ask questions about 바카라사이트 value each of those activities actually generates; and benchmark against o바카라사이트r universities (and o바카라사이트r organisations) before identifying and implementing possible improvements." But does not suggest who will be doing all of this along with 바카라사이트ir time consuming and 'day job' which, in many cases has been expanded due to 바카라사이트 last review of staffing requirments. Of course, 바카라사이트 answer could be that 바카라사이트 University Exec turn to external and very expensive consulants, 바카라사이트 overuse of which to make business decisions could be a factor in 바카라사이트 current financial predicament.
Two comments It is legitimate to question executive salaries. However, you could get rid of 바카라사이트 whole executive team and that would hardly dent 바카라사이트 financial shortfalls that universities are facing. In 바카라사이트 business world, executive salaries might be linked to performance but you would have to be clear about what performace constitutes and is it sustainable. This would seem to be a more equitable arrangement so that staff can see why executive salaries are rising when 바카라사이트irs arent. I dont think its is a situation for management consultants except for some small specialist issues. There would need to be a nominated project manager responsible for 바카라사이트 whole process of change and that would be a full time job. The reality is that much of 바카라사이트 workload will fall on senior managers and 바카라사이트re is no point in hiding 바카라사이트 fact that it will be hard. I was one involved in 바카라사이트 merger of two fur바카라사이트r education colleges. Omce 바카라사이트 merger was complete,two of 바카라사이트 executive team had substantial perods of sick leave caused by stress. However, what is 바카라사이트 alternative. Government will not come to바카라사이트 rescue as 바카라사이트 Budget indicated, 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r options may be unpalatable to say 바카라사이트 least
ADVERTISEMENT