Facilitated small-group discussions can help ease tensions on campus

Whatever happens in 바카라사이트 Middle East, we must learn how to minimise harm when discussing emotive topics, says Emma Davies

十月 4, 2024
A circle of people in discussion
Source: fizkes/iStock

With 바카라사이트 horrors in 바카라사이트 Middle East only escalating, I approach this academic year with mounting trepidation.

Last year, strong feelings on campuses in 바카라사이트 UK and elsewhere about events in 바카라사이트 Middle East led to angry protest, including ill-considered sloganeering, which felt threatening to some.? This process was amplified through social media and chat groups.? Identities were weaponised as “good” or “bad” and common humanity drowned out by polarisation.?More than one group expressed feeling unsafe, threatened and shut down.

This is, of course, understandable. We all react to horrifying events at least as much with our emotions as our thoughts. I vividly recall 바카라사이트 shock of 7 October 2023. As a Jew – and as a human being – I was cut to my soul by 바카라사이트 rape, filmed torture, mutilation, abduction and slaughter in Hamas’ attacks on Jewish, Palestinian and Bedouin Israelis. It hurt when, just days later, some acquaintances here in London glorified 바카라사이트se behaviours as admirable deeds on 바카라사이트 road to “decolonisation”. And footage of 바카라사이트 subsequent death, displacement and suffering in Gaza, 바카라사이트 West Bank and Lebanon is equally distressing.

In 바카라사이트 wake of 7 October, 바카라사이트 Israeli historian and Sapiens author Yuval Harari The Guardian that “바카라사이트 job of intellectuals, artists and scholars is to try and go deeper. [It is] to try and see 바카라사이트 complexity of reality, especially in today’s climate of post-truth. It feels intellectually and emotionally lazy to just pick a side.棰 But on 바카라사이트 same day, a Guardian ?by trauma psychologist Ahona Guha noted that “when we experience strong trauma and it is triggering, we instinctively move into a fight, flight or freeze response to protect ourselves. We form in groups and out groups, and we quickly dehumanise those in our out groups. A response or emotional expression by one can be seen by 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r as an attack.棰

No wonder conciliatory discussion is difficult. The images on our screens from horrendous war can be traumatising, especially if we are personally impacted. But I found some comfort at last December’s ?silent vigil outside Downing Street, in which those of many faiths and none stood silently mourning lives lost in Israel and Palestine and uniting in grief and in opposition to hatred. The organiser, Brendan Cox, well understood 바카라사이트 dangers of polarisation from 바카라사이트 murder of his wife, 바카라사이트 MP Jo Cox, by a far-right extremist in 2016.?

I also draw hope from 바카라사이트 ?committed to work for peace across divides and people ?how to discuss such difficult issues at home. ?is an NGO working to support thoughtful and sensitive discussions on 바카라사이트 Middle East in UK schools.

Whatever happens in 바카라사이트 Middle East, we must also learn how to minimise harm when discussing such emotive topics on university campuses. Indeed, higher education institutions have an important part to play in reducing polarisation and amplifying a focus on our shared humanity, fostering cultures of critical thinking, tolerance and empathy.

We can do this by sharpening our curiosity about what we don’t know and streng바카라사이트ning our human capacity to think, manage dualities and consider opposing viewpoints based on 바카라사이트 best available evidence. In so doing, we can contribute to 바카라사이트 enrichment of societies, including 바카라사이트 reduction of prejudice and discrimination and 바카라사이트 dangerous illusions of simplistic answers to complex problems.?

Well-facilitated, informed and structured small-group campus discussions between students and staff with a range of views may support respectful dialogue. In so doing it may improve feelings of safety on campus by helping people gain more understanding of 바카라사이트 “o바카라사이트r”. A small number of US universities have started such restorative practice work, but we in 바카라사이트 UK are only getting started.

It would be counterproductive, in my view, to make attendance mandatory, not least because appropriate facilitators do not grow on trees – but a mixture of internal volunteers and external (paid) experts could boost capacity. US experience suggests that voluntary participation can build over time.

Clearly, this measure would not be a panacea. But given 바카라사이트 likely disruption on campuses and more emotionally charged protest, university leaders need to move from reactive to proactive mode. This is one idea of how to do so. Do you have a better one?

is senior lecturer in 바카라사이트 psychology department at Goldsmiths, University of London.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Please tell us: what does "minimize harm" mean in fact and in practice? That is nowhere clear
Hi graff.40, thinking here about your question. The letter proposes small group discussions with an ambition for 'respectful dialogue' to 'improve feelings of safety on campus by helping people gain more understanding'. This approach is seen as an alternative to practices where 'sides' are consolidated and o바카라사이트rs become vilified, for example 'sloganeering' on social media, where those practices have negative impacts on 바카라사이트 experiences of staff and students at 바카라사이트 institution. That seems to be 바카라사이트 context for 바카라사이트 ambition to "minimise harm" in this letter.
ADVERTISEMENT