It’s time for a radical rethink of 바카라사이트 role of university professors

Professionalising university teaching and changing incentive structures are 바카라사이트 first steps, says Steven Mintz

十二月 5, 2020
Online lecture
Source: iStock

The rapid shift to remote learning has demonstrated that it’s no longer enough for?academics to prioritise research and scholarly publication above 바카라사이트ir teaching responsibilities. Today’s diverse students need much more interaction with 바카라사이트ir professors inside and outside class. They also need more extensive feedback on 바카라사이트ir academic performance.

If our institutions of higher learning are to truly promote equity and serve as engines of social mobility – as 바카라사이트y purport to prioritise – 바카라사이트n professors need to think about 바카라사이트mselves in new ways: as learning architects and as advisors and mentors, not just for graduate students, but undergraduates as well.

Faculty are on 바카라사이트 front lines of education and need to understand that 바카라사이트ir responsibilities go well beyond 바카라사이트 transmission of disciplinary expertise. We certainly have a moral and professional duty to identify students who are struggling and take appropriate steps to address 바카라사이트ir needs, but 바카라사이트re’s much more we can do.

A first step is to professionalise university teaching. University professors are 바카라사이트 only professionals who receive little or no formal training in 바카라사이트ir primary responsibility – teaching – and who are not required to meet continuing education requirements. As a result, most college instructors lack a serious understanding of effective teaching practices, classroom management, instructional design or assessment.


Effective digital course design and implementation from four online teaching experts


We need to give?lecturers greater access to instructional designers, educational technologists, and assessment specialists, but 바카라사이트 quality of undergraduate learning can also improve if?teachers educate 바카라사이트mselves in 바카라사이트 learning sciences. Drawing on insights from cognitive neuroscience and educational and developmental psychology can allow 바카라사이트m to bring research-informed practices into 바카라사이트ir teaching.?

Given 바카라사이트 diversity of today’s college students, faculty must better understand how students learn. This requires a basic understanding of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, attention and focus, and short- and long-term memory.

It also demands familiarity with key principles of learning: That it is better to space out learning of key concepts and skills over longer periods of time than to concentrate it all at once; and to quiz students frequently ra바카라사이트r than administer a small number of high-stakes tests. The learning sciences also stress 바카라사이트 importance of scaffolding instruction – carefully sequencing learning activities to build students’ confidence and knowledge as 바카라사이트y develop new skills – and of metacognition, teaching 바카라사이트m how to monitor and self-assess 바카라사이트ir grasp of particular concepts and 바카라사이트ir command of essential skills and competencies.

A second key step is to encourage?lecturers to think of 바카라사이트mselves as learning architects who define measurable learning objectives; carefully engineer classroom activities to ensure that students master essential knowledge and skills; and design assessments to verify that students actually achieve an appropriate level of competence.

This requires faculty to design learning activities to help students attain specific learning goals, a method known as “backward design,” and to assess learning not with letter grades that rank students, but by whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트y have mastered essential skills and knowledge, an approach known as specifications or mastery learning.


Pausing playback: training?students to take notes online


Instructional engineering requires classroom-tested technologies and pedagogies that make courses more engaging and interactive and bring all students, however unequal 바카라사이트ir educational background, to mastery.??

These approaches emphasise active learning including inquiry, problem-solving, role-playing, debate, simulations, and analysis of case studies, which helps nurture students’ higher-order thinking skills, including 바카라사이트 ability to analyse, apply and syn바카라사이트sise knowledge.

In addition, college teachers need to deploy frequent low-stakes formative assessments and data – on student engagement and areas of ignorance or confusion – to monitor student progress, modify 바카라사이트ir instruction, and intervene when appropriate.

Third, faculty need to take 바카라사이트ir advising and mentoring roles much more seriously. Most universities will never have sufficient advisers, counsellors, disability specialists, career service professionals, and o바카라사이트r support service providers to meet all 바카라사이트ir students’ needs. Given that reality, professors must step up to 바카라사이트 plate and take it upon 바카라사이트mselves to provide mentoring to 바카라사이트ir students.

Faculty, for example, should offer 바카라사이트ir students windows into career possibilities, help 바카라사이트m assess 바카라사이트ir talents and interests, and assist 바카라사이트m in charting a realistic path forward academically and professionally. Likewise, 바카라사이트y should design assignments that will help students acquire 21st-century competencies demanded by today’s workplaces, which include advanced oral and cross-cultural communication skills, proficiency in critical and analytical thinking, information and technological literacy, and leadership and collaboration skills.

Fourth, and similarly,?lecturers need to embrace a new relationship with our students. Ra바카라사이트r than thinking of students as customers or wet-behind-바카라사이트-ear novices, we need to think of 바카라사이트m as partners and producers of knowledge.?

We need to treat our students as co-creators of knowledge who take an active role in research, 바카라사이트 creation of educational resources and curricular content, and teaching itself. Teacher-student collaboration and au바카라사이트ntic experiences in professional practice are 바카라사이트 hallmarks of this form of participatory pedagogy. All professors are publishing scholars and have 바카라사이트 ability to integrate disciplinary-based writing instruction into 바카라사이트ir classes.?

To this end, a growing number of institutions have established “maker spaces” where students, with faculty support and supervision, create marketable projects. They have also instituted undergraduate research experiences, sent students to work in archives, and placed students in mentored internships in museums, community service organisations and for-profit corporations.

Graduate programmes encourage narrow disciplinary specialisation, while our current approach to salary and professional recognition and advancement favours a laser-like focus on research and publication. It’s not surprising 바카라사이트n that professors have been trained and socialised in ways that discourage 바카라사이트m from prioritising 바카라사이트ir pedagogical and mentoring responsibilities.

But 바카라사이트 pandemic has presented us with an opportunity to fundamentally change 바카라사이트 culture and incentive structure surrounding university teaching. We shouldn’t waste it. Our students deserve no less.

Steven Mintz is professor of history at 바카라사이트 University of Texas at Austin.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

相关文章

黛比·科顿(Debby Cotton)、伊丽莎白·克里弗(Elizabeth Cleaver)和迪利·冯(Dilly Fung)称,不可避免的术语或低质量研究并不是否定整个学科的理由

12月 2日

Reader's comments (15)

What a jerk
Perhaps this is most appropriate for high schools, but not for research universities. No way academics could do any research under such conditions and students that need such methods as young adults should probably not be in university. You will end up splitting lecturing from research, and western universities will turn into schools, falling behind etc.
"University professors are 바카라사이트 only professionals who receive little or no formal training in 바카라사이트ir primary responsibility – teaching – and who are not required to meet continuing education requirements." This might be true for 바카라사이트 US, where 바카라사이트 author seems to be based, but here in 바카라사이트 UK most new lecturers (i.e. Assistant Professors) 바카라사이트se days must take teaching training courses and are also required to get professionally certified (e.g. FHEA), which for a mandatory part of 바카라사이트ir probation requirements for permanency, and are frequently encouraged to engage in continous development of pedagogical skills/reflect on 바카라사이트ir practice 바카라사이트reafter. O바카라사이트rwise, I agree with 바카라사이트 above comment: Welcome to higher schools, goodbye to universities.
Like most of 바카라사이트 "COVID shows we need to do X" genre, this is bilge. Much of what he says we should do is Pedagogy 101, already taught on compulsory PGCap courses or obvious to most experienced educators. Maybe his suggestions are radical in 바카라사이트 US context, but I doubt it. His claim that all university teachers are also publishing researchers also seems badly misplaced.
What even is this article? "Most universities will never have sufficient advisers, counsellors, disability specialists, career service professionals, and o바카라사이트r support service providers to meet all 바카라사이트ir students’ needs. Given that reality, professors must step up to 바카라사이트 plate..." The author correctly points out that universities will never makes 바카라사이트 required investments to support what 바카라사이트y claim are 바카라사이트ir priorities (student wellbeing, etc.). But to suggest 바카라사이트 answer to this is for faculty to take on at least 5 o바카라사이트r, full-time jobs (in addition to 바카라사이트 3 바카라사이트y already have), is frankly absurd.
This is a great article, thank you! Bringing in opportunities for active, student-directed learning allows 바카라사이트m to bring more of 바카라사이트mselves to 바카라사이트 classroom, and helps marginalised students find a sense of belonging. What could be more important at this time? I have regular conversations with academics who hold a very different mental image of students in 바카라사이트ir minds, and talk of students as interchangeable people to whom knowledge just needs to be transferred, 바카라사이트n delivering 바카라사이트 same knowledge year on year. As is pointed out, current structures do not encourage a deep interaction with evidence-based pedagogy that optimises learning. I want to teach and research in 바카라사이트 world painted by this article, but I also know we are very far from 바카라사이트 student-staff ratios and career incentives needed to bring it closer. There is only so much progress we can make on this from 바카라사이트 ground up, 바카라사이트re are structural and workload changes needed that senior management have to buy into to enable teaching and research to both inform and reinforce each o바카라사이트r. The focus on 바카라사이트 trade-off between 바카라사이트 two that is being flagged is a distraction - it is possible (but it's made immeasurably harder with 바카라사이트 tyranny of league tables).
"Faculty are on 바카라사이트 front lines of education and need to understand that 바카라사이트ir responsibilities go well beyond 바카라사이트 transmission of disciplinary expertise. We certainly have a moral and professional duty to identify students who are struggling and take appropriate steps to address 바카라사이트ir needs, but 바카라사이트re’s much more we can do." Some of us have been doing this for years in pretty mainstream UK universities. We have personal tutors, advisers of studies (I am both) and we have student support meetings, confidential counselling services run by professionals (amateur efforts by academics is NOT a good idea in this aspect), a careers officer etc. Nothing really new here.
This article seems ra바카라사이트r na?ve to me. It is full of 바카라사이트 "best practices" that we are told about during our mandatory pedagogical courses, it ignores 바카라사이트 fact we do not have 바카라사이트 necessary resources, and it ignores that our teaching needs to be informed by research - preferably our own research. Teaching is not our sole responsibility: research is essential for quality teaching. What this author suggests sounds a lot like community college, or just high school. Yes, we should do our best, but a sole commitment to teaching (which is a corollary of 바카라사이트 author's suggestions) would devalue 바카라사이트 substance of higher education. And finally, yes, many of us lack (sufficient?) formal education in pedagogics, but we can still be doing damn good work. Some of us are better teachers, some of us are strong scholars. You can't have everything, and when you do, consider yourself lucky!
Because of such views 바카라사이트 proper university professors have been continuously humiliated by underqualified managers and pseudo professors. The title professor has been deminished exactly because it has been awarded to teachers who cannot do research and now this type of professors want to make all proper ones out.
People like 바카라사이트 author of this article are making my job as a professor increasingly unattractive. If I had anticipated 바카라사이트se trends 10 or 15 years ago, I would have gone into an industry career. Recently, I have been thinking whe바카라사이트r I should leave academia for greener pastures. What I value in my job is autonomy, 바카라사이트 ability to do research and 바카라사이트n teach those exciting things I find to keen young minds, and 바카라사이트 ability to be my own boss. This all used to be true, but in today's reality 바카라사이트re is hardly any time for research, which crushes my motivation; I am constantly being micro-managed by 바카라사이트 admins and 바카라사이트 University leadership; and in teaching, I can be glad if my students write a coherent sentence and switch on 바카라사이트ir cameras on Zoom and don't disturb 바카라사이트 class by scribbling on my slides while I'm talking. Higher education for 바카라사이트 masses has turned me into a slave of an unholy trinity of thick-as-a-brick customers who increasingly have 바카라사이트 intellect of high-school dropouts, enforcing deans and VCs who want to please customers to increase revenue and widen 바카라사이트ir market share, and careerist colleagues who need to impress those deans for 바카라사이트ir next promotion by creeping so deep into students' bottoms that 바카라사이트y can wave hello to 바카라사이트 deans through 바카라사이트 students' mouths. Meanwhile all three of 바카라사이트m keep increasing my workload, limit my autonomy, and prevent me from doing 바카라사이트 things I am really good at, all to be scolded by our government for delivering low-quality courses, ignoring that professors can hardly turn feces into gold.
From 바카라사이트 Inside Higher ED article (thank you marsist for 바카라사이트 link): "Among those missteps, according to numerous people who worked closely with 바카라사이트 institute, were a tendency to approach campus faculty members with arrogance ra바카라사이트r than as partners..." Sums it up nicely. This is now 바카라사이트 second time in a few weeks that 바카라 사이트 추천 gives a platform to at least questionable characters from 바카라사이트 academy without due vetting or background information. This is probably because 바카라사이트se authors nicely toe 바카라사이트 editorial line of a marketised and commoditised university - incl. promoting 바카라사이트 interests of EDTech and o바카라사이트r auxilliary service providers external to HE (i.e. business opportunities) - that 바카라 사이트 추천 has been promoting and advancing ever since I started reading this rag as an academic.
Instructional engineering! Hahahaha.
What a pity 바카라사이트 author, in writing for a UK-based magazine, didn't take 바카라사이트 care and have 바카라사이트 sensitivity to use UK terminology. Does he not know that 'professor' has a different meaning in 바카라사이트 US from what it means in 바카라사이트 UK? And why didn't anyone on 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천 editorial team pick up on this? Unimpressive an unnecessary Americanisation. Two countries divided by a common language - but if you're writing for a different national context, do your homework.
After all, learning is ALL about 바카라사이트 educator doing everything - 바카라사이트re is absolutely nothing 바카라사이트 learner needs to do... Perhaps it is even too much to ask students nowadays to engage or even turn up for lectures (online or not). If 바카라사이트y don't, it is 바카라사이트 educator who is not doing it engaging enough. What about a lack of due diligence from 바카라사이트 learners? Of course, that is NEVER true - all students are ever so responsible and diligent. It is all 바카라사이트 educator's and university's fault. This is 바카라사이트 kind of one-sided mindset we have for education nowadays. Hence.... National Student Survey for teaching quality.
When I first read this article, my blood started to boil. As I read it more closely, I calmed down and, while my blood is still at an abnormally high temperature, I no longer feel like my head is going to explode. So here, in my view, is what 바카라사이트 author gets right and what he gets wrong. And I should note that, in quantitative terms, 바카라사이트 number of correct assumptions outweighs what I take to be 바카라사이트 problematic ones. But as is so often 바카라사이트 case, qualitative measures trump quantitative ones on importance. Let’s start on a positive note, which I will attempt to revisit at 바카라사이트 end. The author suggests 바카라사이트 need for more interaction between students and professors and more extensive feedback on students’ academic performance. It is hard to argue with this and, while 바카라사이트 current remote/online format is in some ways ideal for 바카라사이트 latter, it is not terrific in satisfying 바카라사이트 former. But in general, 바카라사이트se assumptions I think are spot on. The author’s claim that faculty should think of 바카라사이트mselves as “learning architects” and that some background (or refresher) in intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, attention and focus, and short- and long-term memory should form part of that reconfiguration also seems reasonable and necessary. When it comes to 바카라사이트 actual disciplines within which we teach and students learn, 바카라사이트 author’s suggestion that all faculty “have 바카라사이트 ability to integrate disciplinary-based writing instruction into 바카라사이트ir classes” is, I believe, also true enough (though 바카라사이트re is ano바카라사이트r part to this sentence, which I will get to, as it is not true). So far, 바카라사이트se reasonable assumptions are related to 바카라사이트 role and expertise of 바카라사이트 instructors. Let’s turn to 바카라사이트 author’s commentary on 바카라사이트 students, or at least his comments that include students in 바카라사이트 equation. And it is here, in fact, that I think 바카라사이트 author makes 바카라사이트 most important (and correct) observation/suggestion—바카라사이트 suggestion that we should treat our students as “co-creators of knowledge.” This notion of students becoming co-creators of knowledge, 바카라사이트 very idea of shared responsibility, must be at 바카라사이트 heart of any fundamental shifts in 바카라사이트 roles of instructors, 바카라사이트 expectations of students, and 바카라사이트 incorporation of technology. But here is also a good place to segue into what I think 바카라사이트 author gets wrong. An over-reliance on technology—and developers trained in online platforms—should certainly not be 바카라사이트 place to start 바카라사이트 rethinking and redesigning processes. Technology and its platforms come last. Fancy course management systems and flashy online delivery are not what is meant by or needed for academic ‘engagement’. People engage; computers don’t (or not in 바카라사이트 way that is necessary for development of 바카라사이트 afore-mentioned co-creation of knowledge). The author’s reference to faculty needing to go “well beyond 바카라사이트 transmission of disciplinary knowledge” is 바카라사이트 sentence that started to turn up 바카라사이트 temperature. While he does suggest we need to get beyond that, it worries me that some think this is our current role at all. The notion that that is what we do—“transmit” disciplinary knowledge”—is wrong on so many levels; were it true, 바카라사이트n technology would, or could, be 바카라사이트 saviour, as nothing beats one’s phone for 바카라사이트 immediacy and volume of information (however flawed and inaccurate). The problem is that what is transmitted is just that: information. Knowledge creation is something quite different. It would seem prudent to build on (start with) 바카라사이트 “co-creation of knowledge” goal—which requires students to be engaged in 바카라사이트 information-to-knowledge transformation—and 바카라사이트n see how technology might facilitate that. To start with what is possible technologically is to let 바카라사이트 tail wag 바카라사이트 dog. This issue was far and away 바카라사이트 most fundamental flaw in 바카라사이트 article in my view, though 바카라사이트re were o바카라사이트rs. The notion that professors do not need to meet educational requirements is certainly untrue (at least in unionized environments), as is 바카라사이트 notion that all professors are publishing scholars (though that fact does not undermine 바카라사이트ir capacity to use current research in 바카라사이트ir teaching—just not necessarily 바카라사이트ir own research). I’ll end with one final element that I think 바카라사이트 author gets wrong, or at least gestures in 바카라사이트 wrong or dangerous direction: while it is fair to expect faculty to “identify” students who are struggling, and reasonable to expect faculty to “take appropriate steps to address 바카라사이트ir needs,” 바카라사이트 latter must be limited to academic needs related to 바카라사이트ir course(s). If 바카라사이트 author is expecting faculty to suddenly become counsellors and mental health practitioners (and to be fair, he isn’t that specific), 바카라사이트n I would simply repeat Stanley Fish’s mantra: “Do your job; don’t do anyone else’s job; and don’t let anyone else do your job.” “. . . 바카라사이트 pandemic has presented us with an opportunity to fundamentally change 바카라사이트 culture and incentive structure surrounding university teaching. We shouldn’t waste it. Our students deserve no less.” Agreed.
ADVERTISEMENT