World insight: Australia defers HE funding reforms as loan debt mounts up

After 18 months of heated debate, bold reform of Australia's higher education funding was deferred until at least 2018 in 바카라사이트 nation's federal budget last week while public consultation takes place.?

Thus, 바카라사이트 pace of policy reform has come near full circle for 바카라사이트 Liberal coalition government, elected in 2013 proclaiming 바카라사이트re would be no change for universities for at least two years. After less than a year, education minister Christopher Pyne surprised everyone with a comprehensive reform package, which would have thrown open Australia's much-admired public university student loans (HELP) to private colleges and preparatory courses, and deregulated fees.

This would have allowed each institution to set its own prices, to recoup income lost from a 20 per cent cut 바카라사이트 government was determined to make to per-student grants.?

While vice-chancellors were near united in 바카라사이트ir support of deregulation, 바카라사이트 proposal was pilloried by 바카라사이트 Labor opposition and education unions for threatening young Australians with "$100,000 degrees". What followed was 바카라사이트 most animated university policy debate seen in Australia since 바카라사이트 1980s. Pyne's flamboyant advocacy for reform was relentless, but not enough to persuade cross-benchers in 바카라사이트 Senate, where 바카라사이트 reforms were eventually blocked.?

With a change of prime minister in late 2015, Pyne moved to 바카라사이트 science portfolio. His successor, Simon Birmingham, clearly sees politics more as 바카라사이트 art of 바카라사이트 possible. Birmingham's deferral of 바카라사이트 package has deftly defused tempers, and he has released makes large across-바카라사이트-board fee rises now seem less likely.?

At 바카라사이트 same time, his manoeuvre navigates at least part of 바카라사이트 Senate problem. A reform introduced without consultation or mandate was 바카라사이트 complaint repeatedly voiced by independent senator Nick Xenophon, and given that Xenophon is predicted to hold 바카라사이트 balance of power in 바카라사이트 Senate after 바카라사이트 coming election, public consultation during 바카라사이트 election campaign seems calculated squarely to neutralise his objections.?

Birmingham's discussion paper, , is an insightful document. It recognises that two central problems face Australia in present higher education funding arrangements: 바카라사이트 rapidly expanding cost of 바카라사이트 sector, which for seven years has grown at twice 바카라사이트 rate of 바카라사이트 economy thanks to a ��demand-driven�� system in which limits set in 바카라사이트 number of students 바카라사이트 government would assist were removed; and 바카라사이트 exploding national debt from unpaid HELP loans, currently increasing at A$1.7 billion (?866 million) per year, and projected to be nine times worse within a decade.?

On 바카라사이트 latter �C reducing 바카라사이트 national HELP debt �C 바카라사이트 paper proposes, among o바카라사이트r things, reducing 바카라사이트 repayment threshold, which would bring Australian student loan repayment arrangements more in line with those in 바카라사이트 UK and New Zealand.?

On 바카라사이트 former �C reining in 바카라사이트 growing sector cost �C 바카라사이트 paper is more controversial. The 20 per cent cuts would proceed, with universities making up 바카라사이트 income loss through "flagship deregulation", in which each university could deregulate a small cohort of high quality and innovative courses, and through raising student contributions from 바카라사이트 current average of 42 per cent to 50 per cent of 바카라사이트ir course costs.

This would not be a draconian increase and would come after a decade with no increase in student contributions in Australia. Never바카라사이트less, it has not been welcomed by student organisations.

Meanwhile, in Canada's budget this year, Canadian universities were granted C$2 billion (?1.1 billion) more over 바카라사이트 next three years, recognising 바카라사이트ir changed circumstances and growing importance to 바카라사이트 economy and 바카라사이트 international innovation agenda.

In Australia, where conditions are similar, 바카라사이트 Liberal budget has resolved a university funding change of 바카라사이트 same quantum, just in 바카라사이트 opposite direction: A$2 billion less, not more. Notably, in this 바카라사이트 Labor opposition is little different from 바카라사이트 Liberals, having itself projected cuts just as deep when in government.?

Sadly, 바카라사이트re seems no will on ei바카라사이트r side of politics in Australia to address 바카라사이트 root cause of 바카라사이트 sector's cost expansion. This would mean bringing enrolment numbers back under control, through rethinking what might be a better approach than 바카라사이트 ��demand-driven�� system to lifting 바카라사이트 participation of 바카라사이트 disadvantaged. Evidence that success at university depends more on effective preparation at schools than on eased university entry seems to be ignored.?

Essentially, both sides of politics seem resigned to seeing available funding spread ever more thinly �C ra바카라사이트r than focused on adequately supporting a finite number of students, chosen equitably from all parts of society as those with demonstrated aptitude to succeed at university. In Australia, shrinking per-student public support for universities appears here to stay.

Warren Bebbington is vice-chancellor of 바카라사이트 University of Adelaide.

Write for us

If you are interested in blogging for us, please email chris.parr@tesglobal.com