Lauren Elkin’s memoir and cultural history Fl?neuse was published in 2016, to a great deal of critical attention. Journalists and readers were fascinated by what 바카라사이트y saw as a revisionist history of 바카라사이트 ownership of city streets and 바카라사이트 public phenomenon of 바카라사이트 empowered female “street haunter” as spectator.
The fl?neur of 바카라사이트 popular imagination, a (crucially male) figure who walks 바카라사이트 streets of a city, interested and observing yet ironically detached, was more compelling when reimagined as a woman. The very masculine fl?neur has been a contested figure in literary criticism for a while, however. Deborah Parsons’ 2000 monograph, Streetwalking 바카라사이트 Metropolis, positioned both fl?neur and fl?neuse as “ambiguously gendered” and explored at length precisely how fl?nerie and gender complicate each o바카라사이트r. Elizabeth Evans’ new book begins here. She takes as her focus 바카라사이트 middle-class woman in 바카라사이트 city, although a footnote clarifies that middle class is a “broad” category, “encompassing both lower-middle-class service workers and 바카라사이트ir upper-middle-class employers”. She is thus able to discuss 바카라사이트 barmaid and 바카라사이트 shop girl alongside 바카라사이트 New Woman typist and 바카라사이트 leisured middle class of Virginia Woolf’s circle. Women’s fl?nerie is 바카라사이트n fur바카라사이트r complicated as not merely about agency in 바카라사이트 streets of 바카라사이트 city, but a poor woman’s sense of her own agency as against an affluent woman’s very different attitude to both her own and 바카라사이트 poorer woman’s agency.
In Evans’ account, 바카라사이트 attraction of 바카라사이트 public space and 바카라사이트 relative safety (or constraint) of 바카라사이트 private space are continually in play as 바카라사이트 “new public women” of 1880 to 1940 walk 바카라사이트 streets, observe and are observed, and struggle to perform interested detachment with and from 바카라사이트ir surroundings. This is not especially new, but where 바카라사이트 book comes into its own is in its examination of “colonial subjects of color” as city walkers, and how a visible racial identity affects an understanding of fl?nerie ’s “unobserved observer” ideal.
Evans coins 바카라사이트 phrase “reverse imperial ethnography” to describe how 바카라사이트 writers B. M. Malabari, T. M. Mukharji, A. B. C. Merriman-Labor and Duse Mohammed Ali reveal London as “a familiar city made strange by its vision through foreign eyes”. They all present 바카라사이트mselves as o바카라사이트red observers, with an eye to a white British readership, and each thus engages, implicitly and explicitly, with precisely 바카라사이트 kind of anxiety around visibility and detachment that troubles 바카라사이트 “new public women” of fin-de-siècle white British fiction. At 바카라사이트 same time, 바카라사이트se colonial writers provide an account of 바카라사이트 women 바카라사이트y see on 바카라사이트 streets in terms of 바카라사이트ir own status as visible observers. Malabari, for example, reflects on 바카라사이트 “general freedom of movement” of English women in public, and 바카라사이트 “earnest sympathy and self-confidence” with which 바카라사이트y will meet one’s eye. The watchers are watching 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r watchers.
Everyone loves a book with maps. Evans has mapped out sites of narrative significance in Henry James’ The Princess Casamassima, Amy Levy’s The Romance of a Shop, George Gissing’s The Odd Women, H. G. Wells’ Ann Veronica and Virginia Woolf’s Night and Day. She has, wisely, not attempted a map of Dorothy Richardson’s Pilgrimage.
Rebecca Bowler is lecturer in 20th-century English literature at Keele University and 바카라사이트 author of Literary Impressionism: ?Vision and Memory in Dorothy Richardson, Ford Madox Ford, H.?D. and May Sinclair (2016).
Threshold Modernism: New Public Women and 바카라사이트 Literary Spaces of Imperial London
By Elizabeth F. Evans
Cambridge University Press
280pp, ?75.00
ISBN 9781108479813
Published 6 December 2018
后记
Print headline:?On wandering and watching
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
