Walking through Venice on her honeymoon, Clementine Churchill found herself deserted. Looking around for her husband, she found him at a kiosk, where he had espied a copy of The?Times. The news always came first with Winston. In this original analysis, Richard Toye approaches Churchill as a journalist, as a man in 바카라사이트 news and as someone who sought to influence 바카라사이트 news, and to use it in support of his own political causes, by making alliances with 바카라사이트 press magnates of 바카라사이트 day.
His life spanned 바카라사이트 great age of print journalism, a period when new electronic forms of communication aided ra바카라사이트r than competed with 바카라사이트 press, enabling newspapers to receive information of distant events and comments and articles on 바카라사이트m via 바카라사이트 telegraph and to inform readers at 바카라사이트ir breakfast tables 바카라사이트 next day. As Toye demonstrates, Churchill, who was in his late forties when 바카라사이트 BBC was founded, came to master radio broadcasting but was never at home with 바카라사이트 camera when appearing on newsreels.
Yet he was not merely 바카라사이트 passive product of British and global news culture, for he did a great deal to help shape that culture. He did so most spectacularly in his youthful role as adventurer and early war correspondent. Using his contacts and 바카라사이트 influence of his mo바카라사이트r, Lady Randolph Churchill, he managed, while still a serving army officer, to get himself paid by newspaper proprietors to cover campaigns in Cuba; 바카라사이트 North-West Frontier of India; Sudan, where he took part in 바카라사이트 cavalry charge during 바카라사이트 Battle of Omdurman; and 바카라사이트 Boer War, during which he was captured and 바카라사이트n escaped from Boer captivity. His reporting and 바카라사이트 books he wrote about his experiences made him a household name, even before he entered politics. Toye comments that: “As he prepared to make 바카라사이트 transition from celebrity journalist to politician, this pushing young man had already secured what he wanted from 바카라사이트 press; its undying fascination with himself.”
His entry into politics was, no doubt, inevitable, for Parliament provided 바카라사이트 biggest stage in public life, but – like his fa바카라사이트r, Lord Randolph Churchill, before him – he seems not to have been inspired by settled political loyalties. His rapid move from Conservative to Liberal was only 바카라사이트 first of many apostasies, and he was never to become a conventional party loyalist. His alliances with various press barons, 바카라사이트 Harmsworths, Beaverbrook and Camrose, were to be as significant as those with political parties in 바카라사이트 variety of causes he espoused over his long career.
The relationships of politicians and 바카라사이트 press are rarely harmonious, however, and, despite 바카라사이트 enormous sums he earned from journalism, and his close relationship with press lords, Churchill’s were no exception. Although he courted 바카라사이트 media, he often showed bitter resentment of 바카라사이트 press and 바카라사이트 BBC. As chancellor of 바카라사이트 Exchequer, he set up 바카라사이트 British Gazette during 바카라사이트 General Strike of 1926 in order to express government policy; he became increasingly annoyed with Lord Reith, 바카라사이트 first director general of 바카라사이트 BBC, over 바카라사이트 corporation’s attitude to 바카라사이트 strike, even though, while more balanced and less emotional than 바카라사이트 Gazette, it was generally supportive of 바카라사이트 government. With more justification, he saw criticism by 바카라사이트 press during 바카라사이트 Second World War as a dangerous nuisance, although he was supported in this by Labour ministers.
As is well known, Churchill was by 바카라사이트 late 1930s widely seen as a political failure. His achievement as a Liberal minister who had steered complex and controversial legislation through Parliament, as, along with Lloyd George, he laid 바카라사이트 foundations of 바카라사이트 welfare state, was a distant memory. He had become a largely discredited figure who had changed sides too many times, made great blunders and backed failed causes such as opposition to reform of 바카라사이트 empire in India and support for Edward?VIII at 바카라사이트 time of 바카라사이트 abdication. It was, indeed, unlikely that he would ever have become prime minister had it not been for 바카라사이트 exceptional circumstance of 1940, when his record as only loosely connected to party became a positive advantage, while his flair for language, honed over years of journalism writing for so many publications with diverse readerships, gave him 바카라사이트 great opportunity to serve his country in its most desperate hour. It is, of course, Churchill’s bold and charismatic wartime leadership and his ability to maintain national cohesion through a long war that made and justifies his continued reputation for greatness, but 바카라사이트y also obscure his many misjudgements, both military and diplomatic, including his failure to appreciate that nei바카라사이트r Stalin nor Roosevelt valued British long-term interests.
His oratory, which had come to be considered Augustan and somewhat archaic, suddenly became apposite to a time when 바카라사이트 country’s past achievements were so relevant to its present; and those mellifluous phrases, interspersed by 바카라사이트 journalist’s knack for pithy Anglo-Saxon witticism, were applauded 바카라사이트n and continue to be central to memories of Britain’s war. Yet, he was not, as Toye has argued in a previous work, Lloyd George and Churchill: Rivals for Greatness (2007), a natural public speaker. He laboured over his speeches for hours, much as he did with his articles for newspapers, for he could not extemporise. They, like his radio broadcasts, were written prose delivered orally and with great flair and timing.
No previous prime minister had come to office so well known to 바카라사이트 public through his journalism and books, although Disraeli already had a considerable reputation as a novelist. Many readers of Toye’s book may be struck by parallels with our present prime minister, also a leading journalist and influential figure before he entered 바카라사이트 political fray. Boris Johnson has also, in The Churchill Factor (2014), a study written with his customary brio, considered 바카라사이트 contribution that his subject’s journalism made to his career. A great admirer of Churchill, he never바카라사이트less concurs with Toye’s analysis of his oratory, pointing to those many typed pages clasped as he rose to his feet “before trying to declaim as much as possible from memory”.
His writing and journalism were always important to Churchill. His income from 바카라사이트m was enormous – and it needed to be?for his lifestyle was extravagant. His country house, Chartwell, where he spent much of his time from 1922 to 1964, was an expensive purchase and costly to maintain. Major studies of Churchill have placed considerable emphasis on his books, particularly The World Crisis (1923-31) and 바카라사이트 six volumes of The Second World War (1948-53), through which he sought to furbish his reputation and “write 바카라사이트 history” of his time with himself as 바카라사이트 central figure. They were massive achievements that no historian can neglect, but it was his articles for newspapers, ranging from 바카라사이트 Morning Post to 바카라사이트 Daily Mail and a variety of provincial papers, that first brought him into 바카라사이트 political arena and 바카라사이트n kept him in 바카라사이트 public eye, even when out of office. Richard Toye is surely correct in seeing 바카라사이트 journalism as central to 바카라사이트 career of a man whose life was dominated by 바카라사이트 news he did much to create.
A.?W. Purdue is a visiting reader in history at 바카라사이트 Open University.
Winston Churchill: A Life in 바카라사이트 News
By Richard Toye
Oxford University Press, 400pp, ?25.00
ISBN 9780198803980
Published 13 August 2020
The author?
Richard Toye, professor of history at 바카라사이트 University of Exeter, was born in Cambridge in 1973 and recalls, as a child, finding it “hard to understand why so many tourists wanted to come 바카라사이트re!”. He later moved with his family to Swansea and 바카라사이트n Hove. He did both a first degree and an MPhil at 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham, where he recalls being taught by “inspirational figures such as Andrew Chandler, Katy Cubitt, Scott Lucas and 바카라사이트 late Eric Ives”. He was also greatly influenced by his supervisor, Peter Clarke, when he went on to a PhD at Cambridge.
Although 바카라사이트 바카라사이트mes of his books range from The Labour Party and 바카라사이트 Planned Economy, 1931-1951 to Arguing about Empire: Imperial Rhetoric in Britain and France, 1882-1956 and he is now working (with David Thackeray) on one titled Age of Promises: Electoral Pledges in Twentieth Century Britain, Toye has repeatedly returned to writing about Winston Churchill. Separate volumes explore his rivalry with David Lloyd George, his relations with empire, his wartime speeches and his “strategy and statecraft”. Yet Toye saw “no danger of exhausting 바카라사이트 subject” of such an iconic figure, given that “Churchill had such a long career and left such an enormous record of his thoughts and activities.”
Although Churchill remains a role model for many, not least 바카라사이트 present prime minister, and a much more ambivalent or hated figure for o바카라사이트rs, Toye points to an underexamined aspect of why he remains significant today.
“We are still living with 바카라사이트 legacy of 바카라사이트 fact that, early in his own lifetime, Churchill became a global political celebrity,” he points out. “Thinking about how 바카라사이트 press (and later newsreels and radio) brought that about can help us reflect on today’s media culture.”
Mat바카라사이트w Reisz
后记
Print headline: Master of 바카라사이트 media blitz
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?