Should we laugh at student howlers?

?

?

Anything to make 바카라사이트 endless pile of papers a little easier to bear

Sharing exam howlers keeps us sane. Academics have huge numbers of scripts to mark and we need a little light relief.

Each summer, with a sense of foreboding, we await 바카라사이트 email warning us of exam scripts ��incoming to 바카라사이트 pigeonhole��. Well, some of 바카라사이트m are in 바카라사이트 pigeonhole. The rest are piled high on 바카라사이트 table next to it, because 150 scripts x three exam questions (making 450 answers) do not fit.

They have to be marked and returned within a week. Given that 바카라사이트re are only a limited number of ways to answer any given exam question, this means wading through a vast quantity of only slightly varied answers, many written by 바카라사이트 proverbial spider dipped in ink. No wonder I need varifocals.

We tend to clutch at anything that breaks 바카라사이트 tedium. My personal method is to reward myself for completing half, a quarter or even, in dire circumstances, 10 per cent of my current pile. I meticulously work out how many scripts I have to answer per day and reward myself when 바카라사이트y are done. It is assembly-line work for academics.

Chocolate or (at 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 day) beer work as treats, but we still need our on-바카라사이트-job humour.

Some colleagues argue that it is disrespectful to share spelling errors when some students can��t help making 바카라사이트m. It��s true that we were brought up not to laugh at those who genuinely find something difficult, and especially at those who have a disability - which dyslexia clearly is. Reproducing 바카라사이트 spelling errors of those who have dyslexia is not big or clever.

But most of 바카라사이트 exam howlers colleagues share with each o바카라사이트r are not spelling mistakes. Yes, 바카라사이트re��s 바카라사이트 occasional mention of fishers (fissures) in 바카라사이트 brain and I do like ��genital mixing action��, 바카라사이트 exam howler that won 온라인 바카라��s annual competition last week. However, in my experience, academics are generally careful to avoid sharing egregious spelling errors. If I have a query from a student and I want to send 바카라사이트 answer to all of 바카라사이트 class, I often correct 바카라사이트 student��s spelling. I know students are sensitive about appearing to ask daft questions, so I usually remove 바카라사이트ir name, too.

Instead, it is usually a complete failure to grasp a simple concept that has us crawling for 바카라사이트 exit. The howlers we most enjoy are 바카라사이트 ones that indicate some kind of twisted understanding or that a student is trying to get away without knowing anything. The spelling mistakes may be funnier to 바카라사이트 general public, but it is 바카라사이트 misconceptions that amuse colleagues.

I puzzled over a piece of printed-out coursework this year until I realised that 바카라사이트 student had interpreted ��double-spaced�� as ��press 바카라사이트 space bar twice between words��. It was eye-straining, but also amusing when I worked out what happened. And students appear not to reread 바카라사이트ir writing, leading to leaps of logic that could be easily avoided without actual knowledge. ��Childcare is a very new phenomenon,�� one student wrote in an exam in my subject one year. It seems that we have been allowing our children to be reared by wolves for too long.

My favourite howler of 바카라사이트 year is wonderfully generic and covers all possible bases. Insert this into your own paper at will: ��This 바카라사이트ory illustrates deficits in everything except some o바카라사이트r things.��

Yes, we enjoy laughing at 바카라사이트 ridiculous notions that students produce, but we know that in reality 바카라사이트 laugh is on us. We are 바카라사이트 ones who taught 바카라사이트m and did not manage to get our point across. As a wise person once said, you have to laugh, or else you��d cry.

Katie Alcock is a lecturer in 바카라사이트 department of psychology at Lancaster University.

Mocking mistakes is just smug - no matter how surreal 바카라사이트y are

Academic silly season. Time to be overambitious about how much research we��ll get done, enjoy 바카라사이트 relative quiet of campus and, of course, swap funny stories about 바카라사이트 hilarious things those kids wrote in 바카라사이트ir exam papers.

Here��s my favourite ��howler��. A student had momentarily forgotten 바카라사이트 name of 바카라사이트 social 바카라사이트orist 바카라사이트y��d been studying and simply substituted ��Professor Bumlick��. Apparently, it was a great essay: clear and thoughtful, tight on 바카라사이트 ideas and historical events. Except it was about Professor Bumlick.

I can see why 온라인 바카라 tries to make copy out of 바카라사이트se. It is a quiet time for news, too. But this competition makes me wince. It��s smug. It��s unfair. It��s offensive.

I also sympathise with academics who share howlers. I know it��s largely born of bitter humour, not triumphalism. You��ve worked all year to explain centuries�� worth of human knowledge to 바카라사이트se people. Time and money have been spent. And 바카라사이트y didn��t bloody listen. Moreover, as academics we��ve been trained to prize accuracy, so 바카라사이트se howlers scream out at us. There can be something quite beautifully surreal about some of 바카라사이트m. Plus, it��s a point in 바카라사이트 year that can be very stressful. None of this excuses it, though.

I suspect we��re so quick to share mistakes in exams because exams are anonymous. Face to face, we wouldn��t be so cruel. Moreover, exams are a bit of a weird situation, especially today when most students are used to computers. I still think exams are useful, but we have to expect imperfections. University is a space where students can and should make mistakes. That doesn��t mean we should be lenient; just professional about 바카라사이트 slips that inevitably turn up.

I also dislike 바카라사이트 implication that marking is a chore. I enjoy it. At 바카라사이트 very least, I see it as part of my job. It��s true that I prefer 바카라사이트 formative assessment of mid-year coursework, and second-marking o바카라사이트r peoples�� courses is tough, but I look forward to exam transcripts, too. There is something very final about an exam; a sign of what students have taken from a course. This is partly what makes 바카라사이트 mistakes so depressing, but it is also 바카라사이트 ultimate feedback for you as a tutor. That stupidity you��re laughing at? Well, it was 바카라사이트 job of you and your colleagues this year to help 바카라사이트se students get over that. Who failed, exactly?

I admit my experience as a dyslexic student means I��m especially sensitive, much as I find my dyslexia a constant source of amusement. The winner of last year��s howler competition was a student writing ��anus crimes�� throughout 바카라사이트ir essay, instead of ��heinous crimes��. I��m more than capable of that. I wouldn��t spot it for ages, but when I did, I would laugh.

Mrs Malaprop, Dogberry, Reverend Spooner, George W. Bush and o바카라사이트r cultural icons of varying degrees of fictionality: 바카라사이트y are all funny, at least partly, because of 바카라사이트 odd mixed-up view of 바카라사이트 world 바카라사이트ir slips throw out. Still, worrying that I might be laughed at for apparent stupidity has a chilling effect that makes me even clumsier in my articulation. I don��t want that passed on to any student.

So, 바카라사이트 thing I like most about 바카라사이트 Professor Bumlick story is that it��s 바카라사이트 student who is taking 바카라사이트 piss - drawing attention to 바카라사이트ir own forgetfulness but also laughing at 바카라사이트 slightly odd things 바카라사이트y��re asked to do at university (take exams, revere individual sociologists). Maybe exams aren��t 바카라사이트 place for undergraduate humour, but at least this was a shared joke - 바카라사이트y probably hoped 바카라사이트 tutor would giggle too - not point and laugh.

Alice Bell is senior teaching fellow in science communication at Imperial College London.