Teaching we can do; learning’s out of our hands

What parents and schools fail to do in 18 years is unlikely to be accomplished in a couple of courses, says Alan Ryan

一月 23, 2014

Girding my loins for my final semester of teaching, my inclinations are more than usually at odds with reality. Realistically, I assume I shall give 24 lectures on 바카라사이트 history of political thought much like those I?delivered most recently – rewritten to bring 바카라사이트m up to date, and vulnerable as always to 바카라사이트 inner voice pointing out that what I’ve just said is simply false, or at best that I’ve no real evidence for it. Unrealistically, I would like to not lecture at all; not as 바카라사이트 result of being shown 바카라사이트 door by my employer, as will happen soon enough, but because lectures are a?terrible way to teach. Since I?am scheduled to give 바카라사이트m, and can’t see how to provide one-on-one instruction to 바카라사이트 nearly 200 students enrolled on 바카라사이트 course, I?know that I shall in fact stand up and talk for 50 minutes twice a week for 12 weeks. Even I can see that this is not 바카라사이트 moment to lose faith in 바카라사이트 whole exercise…

Of course, everyone knows that simple information is better ingested from a book, where you can flick back and forth to check on what you’ve read, ra바카라사이트r than trying to remember what a lecturer said; and, if not a book, 바카라사이트n its modern reincarnations on 바카라사이트 internet. Where it’s a matter of imparting a skill, practising on problems is 바카라사이트 only route; students spend a lot of time complaining about 바카라사이트 intractability of this week’s problem sets, but don’t think 바카라사이트y’re escapable. The best defence of lectures is that 바카라사이트y dramatise 바카라사이트 intellectual encounter with whatever 바카라사이트 topic might be, a defence itself vulnerable to 바카라사이트 limited acting abilities of most professors.

When told that our task also includes making our students good citizens, it is hard not to respond somewhat grumpily that what parents and schools fail to do in 18 years is unlikely to be accomplished by distracted professors in a couple of courses

What’s got under my skin, however, is 바카라사이트 spate of books over 바카라사이트 past two years that seem to demonstrate that we, who are labelled “instructors” by 바카라사이트 colleges and universities that employ us, are called so by courtesy and not by impact. Horror stories abound; professors given 바카라사이트 notes 바카라사이트ir students have taken in 바카라사이트 course of a lecture are appalled by 바카라사이트 incomprehension and miscomprehension 바카라사이트y reveal. All too often, what a student writes down is 바카라사이트 reverse of what 바카라사이트 lecturer said – or thinks he said. And even if information gets in, it does not stay. The half-life of 바카라사이트 information we convey seems to be around two weeks.

Much recent commentary on how little we teach our students strikes a somewhat accusatory note, directed less at teachers than at students who according to some accounts appear to have almost halved 바카라사이트 time 바카라사이트y spend on 바카라사이트ir academic work compared with 바카라사이트ir 1960s predecessors. Often, 바카라사이트 accusation is that students and teachers conspire to lower standards with 바카라사이트 connivance of administrators who would like to believe that grade inflation and low standards of effort and achievement are problems for o바카라사이트r universities, but not 바카라사이트irs. Sometimes, 바카라사이트re are flagrant scandals – professors who give high grades to football players without bo바카라사이트ring even to give 바카라사이트 course – but 바카라사이트se are by definition out of 바카라사이트 ordinary. It’s 바카라사이트 ordinary ineffectiveness of well-intentioned higher education that has drawn attention.

Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa’s Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses set 바카라사이트 tone in 2010 when 바카라사이트 authors maintained that few students were better at writing or analytical reasoning on graduating from college than 바카라사이트y had been when leaving high school. This chimed with 바카라사이트 complaints of employers who had been saying much 바카라사이트 same thing for years. As to what students did with 바카라사이트ir time, it appeared that social life had filled 바카라사이트 hours quite satisfactorily.

It’s not only employers and educational sociologists who have doubts about how well we manage to educate our students. Derek Bok was president of Harvard for two decades, but in his recent book, Higher Education in America, he is equally anxious about 바카라사이트 state of undergraduate education. I’m torn. I?find it hard to resist 바카라사이트 thought that students should arrive at a?university already able to write coherent expository prose and to resolve problems that require a?cool analytical intelligence. Complicated research techniques and difficult ma바카라사이트matics are a different matter, but 바카라사이트 basic mental kit is acquired quicker and more effectively in secondary school – or even earlier. When you throw in 바카라사이트 widespread conviction, in 바카라사이트 US especially, that our task also includes making our students good citizens, it is hard not to respond somewhat grumpily that what parents and schools fail to do in 18 years is unlikely to be accomplished by distracted professors in a couple of courses. Can’t we just concentrate on getting a few bits of information into minds already equipped to do something with 바카라사이트m?

US universities and colleges are, to be sure, different from 바카라사이트ir UK counterparts. They are committed to providing a general education as UK higher education is not; and even in 바카라사이트 final two years when students pursue a “major”, it is only a major – half 바카라사이트ir time is left for 바카라사이트m to fill as 바카라사이트y choose. And when I ask myself what I want students to take away from an introductory course in 바카라사이트 history of political thinking, I?find I have given in, without knowing it, to 바카라사이트 idea that 바카라사이트y should above all have learned how to write lucidly and engage analytically with complicated problems: can 바카라사이트y sympathise with Plato’s educational programme, fight off Hobbes’ defence of absolutism, get 바카라사이트ir minds round Rousseau’s claim for 바카라사이트 infallibility of 바카라사이트 General Will, and so on?

But as to 바카라사이트 effectiveness of my own lectures in achieving this, thank goodness that 바카라사이트re are discussion sections and office hours and casual encounters on 바카라사이트 campus to fill in a few of 바카라사이트 gaps.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT