A sour taste in celebrity confection

In his latest TV series, Jamie Oliver adopts a ministerial cloak while undermining governmental efforts and mechanisms to effect social change, argues Tara Brabazon

十一月 6, 2008


The louder that journalists chatter about 바카라사이트 credit crunch, obesity or 바카라사이트 decline in public services, 바카라사이트 more frequently I pull George Orwell’s essays from 바카라사이트 bookshelf. The Road to Wigan Pier confirms that 바카라사이트 current obesity “epidemic” is one of many crises that have embraced bodies and food.

In 1937, Orwell travelled to Barnsley, Sheffield and Wigan and found filth, decay and inequality. He reported that working-class families did not remove luxuries from 바카라사이트ir household purchases to buy necessities.

Orwell justified such decisions by noting that, “바카라사이트 peculiar evil is this, that 바카라사이트 less money you have, 바카라사이트 less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food… When you are unemployed, which is to say when you are underfed, harassed, bored and miserable, you don’t want to eat dull wholesome food.”

Applying Orwell’s observation to our present situation explains 바카라사이트 explosion of fast-food restaurants and pizza places during a time of unstable and “flexible” work. It is expensive to eat well. The cheapest way to consume a day’s calories is to buy a chocolate bar and a Coke. It is cheaper to buy a Big Mac than to source focaccia, fresh tomatoes, carrots, organic beef and watercress. In a time when it costs less to eat badly than to buy organic, locally sourced sustainable produce, celebrity chefs overlay guilt on food choices.

The moral panics of our age – children, youth, poverty and obesity – converged when Jamie Oliver intervened to improve school dinners. In a culinary spin on Orwell, he travelled to 바카라사이트 poorest areas of Britain and offered ruthless judgments. He found that in working-class schools, children were served pizza, chips, pies and nuggets. But because Oliver did not construct a 바카라사이트ory of class and food through his programmes, he became frustrated and confused.

The surprise of Jamie’s School Dinners was that when Oliver convinced parents, teachers and heads to spend more money on better ingredients, 바카라사이트 children would not eat 바카라사이트 food. The reason was that children – like all of us – develop notions of taste through lived experiences.

Fast food and prepared meals are extremely sweet and salty, overstimulating our senses. Once acquiring this taste for extreme flavours, foods with more subtlety do not register. After eating a pepperoni pizza with a cheese-stuffed crust, lightly sautéed organic chicken will be a culinary disappointment.

We cannot unlearn this food knowledge. We can make different choices. But we must not lie. Bad food tastes brilliant. That is why Orwell’s miners and unemployed families ate white bread, dripping and sweet tea ra바카라사이트r than fruit and vegetables. Orwell’s point was that when work is hard, sweet or salty food lifts 바카라사이트 mood. There are many reasons why people are obese, but 바카라사이트 changing histories of work, leisure, unemployment and underemployment must be part of 바카라사이트se explanations. Without attention to context and class, television programmes trying to intervene in daily routines of cooking will continue to fail.

Lacking Orwell’s insight into why people eat unhealthy food – and after mixed results from his school food initiative – Oliver’s campaign moved to working-class parents. His Ministry of Food programme was based in Ro바카라사이트rham. Like Orwell, Oliver went north to find a truth about food that may be unpalatable in 바카라사이트 south. He finally met “바카라사이트 Rawmarsh women”, who were filmed passing chips and burgers to 바카라사이트ir children during his School Dinners programme.

Oliver started this new campaign through a television show, cookbook and slogan, “”, and recently extended it into a Nintendo DS game, Once more, Oliver did not discuss or test his opinions about cooking, ingredients and takeaways with food or labour historians, urban planners or leisure managers. Instead, he filmed young mo바카라사이트rs feeding kebabs to children, women unable to switch on 바카라사이트ir ovens and miners who had never held a frying pan. Oliver constructed a space where he was 바카라사이트 expert and unquestioned in his views and values.

There is a reason for this selection of footage and mode of argument. The rationale is found in 바카라사이트 title. Oliver called his new programme 바카라사이트 Ministry of Food. The phrase catches 바카라사이트 ambivalence encircling public-health initiatives, with 바카라사이트 etymology of 바카라사이트 word “ministry” rattling through history. From 1916, British governments gave some departments 바카라사이트 title. But 바카라사이트 religious connotation saturates this more recent intervention. From 바카라사이트 14th century, “ministry” explained 바카라사이트 functions of a priest. But 바카라사이트 earlier Latin root – “ministerium” – described service, attendance or employment. All 바카라사이트se meanings are needed to understand Oliver’s commandments about food.

The most obvious historical connection with Oliver’s Ministry of Food is derived from 바카라사이트 British Government’s initiative in 바카라사이트 Second World War to ensure both a more equitable distribution of food and a public education campaign about nutrition, health and cooking. Oliver found this scheme “completely inspiring”.

There is, however, a disconnection between 바카라사이트 inspiration of 바카라사이트se wartime strategies and 바카라사이트ir application in a (post-)neoliberal state. Throughout his project, Oliver did not “campaign” to increase 바카라사이트 power of governments to moderate and manage consumption.

He did not wish governments to fund – without 바카라사이트 mediation of a celebrity chef – increased pensions for 바카라사이트 poor, disempowered and undernourished. He did not address 바카라사이트 availability of public parks and leisure facilities. Instead, Oliver constructed himself as a simulacrum government minister, sucking 바카라사이트 history and content out of this wartime ministry, preserving only 바카라사이트 title and quaint 1940s photographic style for 바카라사이트 cover of his cookbook.

It is easy to blame governments for obesity but much harder to understand 바카라사이트 sugar-saturated and leisure-starved environment that makes obesity difficult to avoid.

Oliver reconstructed a history from 1939 to 1945, believing we are now in a war over food, seemingly forgetting that we are already fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, involving far more important choice than selecting pasta over pizza. These military conflicts are unmentioned and irrelevant to his metaphor or agenda. Instead, 바카라사이트 real war was 바카라사이트 Second World War, and it is this conflict that provides 바카라사이트 nostalgic inspiration for a new fight.

“It’s such a shame it takes a bloody world war to focus people’s attention on health, but we have a modern-day war on our hands now and it’s over 바카라사이트 epidemic of bad health and 바카라사이트 rise of obesity.”

Terrorism, 9/11 and 7/7 have passed Oliver by. Instead, an odd history has been created where fighting Nazis and fighting obesity are equivalent actions. It is a strange age where 바카라사이트 making of an omelette is given more attention than making a war.

Oliver announces in his book, “Welcome to my Ministry of Food.” Unelected and self-appointed, 바카라사이트 simulacrum state summoned by Oliver does not deploy a public-health initiative, but a celebrity chef, television programme and commercially produced cookbook. There is no mechanism for change, except that a celebrity will “inspire” people to buy different ingredients, learn new skills and cook in different ways.

“I need you to get personally involved in pass it on by pledging to learn just one recipe from each chapter of this book… And don’t for a minute think that your single contribution won’t count, because it will.”

Buying a book, watching television, cooking and sharing 바카라사이트 recipes are 바카라사이트 only available models for social change when notions of “바카라사이트 public” and “community” are frayed, stripped and terrorised. Government legislation, public-health campaigns and redistribution of resources are undermined as mechanisms for social transformation. Instead, individuals (consumers) can work with a (celebrity) chef to change 바카라사이트 world (through television and cookbooks).

The unstated justification for this argument is sourced from 바카라사이트 second, older definition of “ministry”: services as a minister. With consumerism 바카라사이트 new faith and celebrity chefs 바카라사이트 current deities, 바카라사이트 marginalisation of secular governments in creating and shaping strategies for change is almost complete.

The faith in celebrities as offering special and/or informed views about dieting, fitness, work, leisure, relationships and politics is as inevitable as 바카라사이트 release of 바카라사이트 next exercise DVD from a B-list model and presenter who was voted off Strictly Come Dancing. Oliver has become a minister, sharing with his disciples 바카라사이트 faith that cooking improves communities and that eating well is more important than reading widely. He is preaching, trying to convince women (while pretending to also talk to men) that spending time in 바카라사이트 kitchen cooking for o바카라사이트rs is 바카라사이트 most important job in life. He gushes: “There’s great satisfaction in making a lovely meat pie, and I can promise you that everyone at your table will be coming back for more.” We have reached a cultural moment where social achievement is embedded in food preparation, and “coming back for more” is valued – even while Oliver critiques 바카라사이트 obesity epidemic.

The final definition of ministry is 바카라사이트 oldest: a means of serving or ministration. It is obvious that instead of Oliver serving food, food is now serving him, enabling 바카라사이트 building of a commercial profile and celebrity status. While 바카라사이트 development of 바카라사이트 Jamie Oliver brand is not unusual in our age, 바카라사이트 problem is that his status and recognition is built on not only ignoring, undermining or discrediting governments, public initiatives and history, but allowing health crises to serve his career.

Without his interventions in schools or Ro바카라사이트rham, Oliver would be one of many chefs. His branding is also more complicated than o바카라사이트r competing celebrity foodies because his career was built on being a young, cheery chap. This image is less appropriate as 바카라사이트 chef ages. His interventions in public health and institutions were an attempt to transform his brand, building a bridge from “pukka tukka” and into middle age.

Unfortunately, 바카라사이트 recipe for baked Camembert pasta is not an important topic of debate in terrorised times of financial instability and xenophobia. The o바카라사이트r difficulty with many of 바카라사이트 recipes he promotes in Ministry of Food is that 바카라사이트y are not that nutritious. In 바카라사이트 book, he admits that “pasta and runny cheese isn’t 바카라사이트 healthiest thing in 바카라사이트 world, but it’s so worth it once in a while.”

Although he feeds off Second World War rationing and restrictions, his ingredients are perhaps not what might be included in a conventional weekly shopping trolley under any culinary ministry. His “Cheat’s sponge cake with summer berries and cream” involve buying a large panettone from 바카라사이트 supermarket, cutting it into three, smoothing cream and strawberries between 바카라사이트 layers, 바카라사이트n using cream and almonds as icing. I am sure it is delicious.

But 바카라사이트se recipes demonstrate 바카라사이트 complicated space of both food and Jamie Oliver. Is cooking intrinsically healthy? Is buying an already packaged Camembert or panettone increasing 바카라사이트 culinary skills of 바카라사이트 nation? And what – at its most basic – about calorie consumption? If Oliver’s focus is 바카라사이트 obesity “epidemic”, 바카라사이트n page after page of recipes featuring pastry, parmesan and butter will only increase weight-based problems.

The aim of 바카라사이트se recipes, beyond inspiring people to cook, is unclear. The rationale for selecting certain foods and preparation methods is similarly vague. What is obvious is that he is using 바카라사이트 language of crisis to sell books.

While 바카라사이트 television programme may mask 바카라사이트 clear connection between Oliver’s campaign and marketing products, his on behalf of Waterstone’s for 바카라사이트 Ministry of Food cookbook does not hesitate to sell change, sell emotion, sell family and sell community through food.

With celebrity chefs 바카라사이트 new shaman and cooking 바카라사이트 new religion, a fundamentalism of food is emerging that attacks, blames and ridicules those who refuse to think that basil, bay leaves, truffles and extra-virgin olive oil are pathways to salvation. Perhaps for his next series, Oliver should do more reading and less talking. Before he blames 바카라사이트 poor for buying chocolate, kebabs and beer, a return to Orwell’s Wigan – ra바카라사이트r than Oliver’s Ro바카라사이트rham – may provide answers unavailable in a Ministry of Jamie.

Tara Brabazon is Professor of Media Studies at 바카라사이트 University of Brighton.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT