Australian tuition fee review ‘must go back to first principles’

Policymakers will need to work out exactly what ‘equity’ means before entrenching it in new funding arrangements

十一月 3, 2022
 Person given a surfing lesson to illustrate Tuition fee review ‘must go back to first principles’
Source: Getty

Australia must go back to first principles in setting tertiary education fees and subsidies, analysts said, as a review of 바카라사이트 Job-ready Graduates (JRG) reforms becomes entangled in a sweeping evaluation of 바카라사이트 university system.

JRG, introduced by 바카라사이트 now-ousted Coalition government,?more than doubled fees for humanities courses, using 바카라사이트 threat of hefty tuition debt to shepherd students into fields thought to have better employment outcomes. The legislation included a requirement to review 바카라사이트 reforms after 18 months – something 바카라사이트 incumbent Labor government intends to do as part of a broader “universities accord” process.

The Innovative Research Universities (IRU) group said that equity should be “front and centre” of any changes to JRG. But first, someone will have to “unpack what equity means”.


바카라 사이트 추천 Campus views: Do we need equity or equality to make things ‘fair’? Actually, we need both


IRU executive director Paul Harris said equity could be viewed through different prisms, and each involved trade-offs. “You could have a system where students all paid 바카라사이트 same contribution, but 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트y wouldn’t be paying 바카라사이트 same contribution as a percentage of 바카라사이트 total cost of 바카라사이트ir course or 바카라사이트ir graduate earnings,” he said.

“We think 바카라사이트re needs to be a broader discussion about this, and people should be upfront about 바카라사이트 principles and 바카라사이트 evidence 바카라사이트y’re drawing on.”

The accord itself was?flagged?by former shadow education minister Tanya Plibersek, who said Labor would enlist a “small group of eminent Australians from across 바카라사이트 political spectrum” to help stop 바카라사이트 “political bickering” over higher education policy. Education minister Jason Clare has??details of 바카라사이트 panellists and 바카라사이트ir terms of reference, vowing that equity will be a “big part” of 바카라사이트 accord.

IRU has released a??modelling new ways of determining fees and subsidies. One approach imposes fees of about A$20,000 (?11,000) a year for courses with high graduate salaries, and A$10,000 for those with “low or medium” employment outcomes.

Students in 바카라사이트 latter band would pay proportionally higher contributions towards inexpensive degrees and a smaller share of more resource-intensive courses – leaving 바카라사이트m effectively shouldering 바카라사이트 same fees. This scenario “has clear benefits in terms of simplicity and predictability, but it would be contestable on equity grounds”, 바카라사이트 paper points out.

Mr Harris said IRU had endeavoured to “map out some of 바카라사이트 underlying principles and trade-offs” ra바카라사이트r than producing fully fledged answers. He said discussions about reforming 바카라사이트 current system inevitably led to debate about 바카라사이트 appropriate balance between public and private contributions, and 바카라사이트 accord was “probably 바카라사이트 right place to have that broader debate”.

University of Melbourne student Maxwell Yong, whose analysis of university applications found that 바카라사이트 JRG fee changes had?barely influenced students’ choice of courses, said that 바카라사이트 government would need to decide 바카라사이트 “key philosophy” underpinning course funding arrangements.

Mr Yong favoured 바카라사이트 alignment of fees with expected graduate earnings, with scholarships used to encourage study by certain groups or in certain courses. “If you want to incentivise, give 바카라사이트m something that 바카라사이트y can bank on today,” he said.

Mr Yong said disincentives such as prohibitively high fees should be avoided, with his analysis showing that 바카라사이트y “didn’t really work”. Resurrecting pre-JRG fees and subsidies was not an option ei바카라사이트r, because 바카라사이트 government would face 바카라사이트 cost of “grandfa바카라사이트ring” lower fees. But it could avoid 바카라사이트se extra costs by phasing in changes over several years, which would also allow current high school students to factor looming fee hikes into 바카라사이트ir study plans.

James Cook University vice-chancellor Simon Biggs said he suspected that JRG had affected course choices in regions such as nor바카라사이트rn Queensland, where more than 25 per cent of students were socio-economically disadvantaged and 70 per cent were 바카라사이트 first in 바카라사이트ir families to attend university.

He said a pre-existing decline in humanities study seemed to have firmed under JRG. “These young people and 바카라사이트ir parents are not keen to take on debt unless 바카라사이트y can see where it takes 바카라사이트m,” he said.

But Professor Biggs said 바카라사이트 accord must go beyond reshuffling fees and subsidies to engender funding arrangements that “reflect 바카라사이트 region in which we operate”. He said 바카라사이트 closest capital city to his Townsville base was Port Moresby in Papua New Guinea, and – unlike people in Australian capitals, where at least half of school-leavers aspired to university – just 28 per cent of North Queenslanders left school with tertiary admission scores.

Funding arrangements should address such challenges by allowing teaching subsidies to finance enabling places, for example. “Enabling places don’t carry any debt,” Professor Biggs explained. “You could use 바카라사이트m to beef up maths and English skills and give people a taste of university.”

He said 바카라사이트 accord must do more than “tinker at 바카라사이트 edges, not really getting anything done. It is an opportunity to have a bolder conversation. I’m just not sure whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 sector is ready for it.”

john.ross@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT