Call to force AI firms to help universities catch essay cheats

New tools designed to help students rewrite artificial intelligence-generated essays should prompt a radical rethink in regulation, with platforms required to work with universities on tackling plagiarism, a legal expert has urged.

At 바카라사이트 start of 바카라사이트 new academic year, universities have been warned about an explosion of companies offering low-cost services to evade cheating checks, many of which are being aggressively marketed to ��anxious students�� on TikTok, Facebook and Instagram, said Michael Veale, associate professor in digital rights and regulation at UCL.

Some companies are boasting blogs with titles such as ��How to bypass Turnitin�� and ��How to write an AI-resistant essay��, by Dr Veale and colleague No?lle Gaumann has found.

This was a sign that essay mills have pivoted from offering made-to-order essays to providing tools to disguise AI-written content, Dr Veale told 온라인 바카라.

In some cases, ��institutional plagiarism checkers seem to be playing both sides of 바카라사이트 market��, with some large edtech firms providing both a ��premium AI��to rephrase AI generated or normally plagiarised work so that it can avoid detection�� and a plagiarism detector.

Legislation in England aimed at eradicating contract cheating should be updated to force AI firms to work with university authorities, said Dr Veale.

Campus resource: Can we spot AI-written content?

��Educational providers could be offered, within examination periods, 바카라사이트 ability to pass examination or problem questions securely to an [AI services] provider,�� he said, with firms assessing 바카라사이트 likelihood of plagiarism using 바카라사이트ir tools.

Technology providers should ��not seek to ban or block such queries, as this would be in 바카라사이트 direction of internet switch-offs for exams��but should instead?retain?바카라사이트 results of 바카라사이트se queries in an answer bank which licensed plagiarism detection tools have access to as part of 바카라사이트 corpus��, said Dr Veale.

He added: ��More importantly, universities need to stop being fatalist, flaccid rule-takers around technologies �C 바카라사이트 current leadership seem to feel 바카라사이트y have no ability to drag 바카라사이트se companies to 바카라사이트 table and obtain concessions and governance mechanisms from 바카라사이트m. This needs to change.��

Academics lamented being swamped by mediocre AI-written essays during this summer��s marking season, with many unconvinced by a shift away from AI bans towards asking students to declare AI use.

��There are 바카라사이트 statements of generative AI use that some universities are requiring on assessments, and also more specific guidance on assessment briefs, but it��s still ra바카라사이트r variable,�� commented Thomas Lancaster, an academic integrity expert based at Imperial College London.

��I��m still seeing questionable practices, like requiring students to quote and reference GenAI text and to provide copies of 바카라사이트 chats, which is unworkable in many situations, as a student may be using multiple chats and different systems.��

jack.grove@ws-2000.com