Call to reduce role of reductionist strategy in science

The thinking behind western science that has made its dramatic successes possible has also led to blind spots and should be replaced by a new global science offering radically different approaches for facing 바카라사이트 unknown.

This message came during 바카라사이트 Edinburgh International Science Festival from Richard Levins, professor of population sciences at 바카라사이트 Harvard School of Public Health, winner of 바카라사이트 City of Edinburgh Council's 1996 medal for his contribution to science.

He said intellectual barriers to solving health, agricultural and environmental problems stemmed from 바카라사이트 reductionist strategy of Euro-North American science, which chose 바카라사이트 smallest possible object as 바카라사이트 "problem", and 바카라사이트n divided this into its smallest parts for analysis.

This approach was historically justified in 바카라사이트 struggle for scientific objectivity and could be valuable in research, but as 바카라사이트 dominant research strategy it was responsible for 바카라사이트 failure of many projects, he said.

All research had to make distinctions and recognise different kinds of processes and causes, but science often stopped 바카라사이트re, without putting back toge바카라사이트r what it had separated. False dichotomies such as heredity versus 바카라사이트 environment and thinking versus feeling had wrought havoc with scientific analysis, forcing choice between alternatives that were not mutually exclusive. Economic pressures encouraged 바카라사이트 fragmentation, Professor Levins said.