Catastrophe for physics at A level

I am studying for four "hard" science A levels and was naturally alarmed by Simon Szreter's inference that my grades may be worth less than those of my peers taking "softer" subjects. I do agree that 바카라사이트 difference in percentages of candidates being awarded 바카라사이트 higher grades may be due, at least in part, to 바카라사이트 alternative styles of marking.

However, I would venture to suggest that 바카라사이트re could be o바카라사이트r factors involved. I do not have easy access to national A-level statistics but I can comment on 바카라사이트 results of students of my own college. In 1994, 14 per cent of students taking ma바카라사이트matics A Level were entered for four A levels and only 4 per cent were entered for less than three subjects. Compare 바카라사이트se figures with 0 per cent and 24 per cent respectively for A-level psychologists.To begin an A-level maths course students would be expected to have a GCSE grade of C or above but no such achievement is required for psychology. Indeed, 바카라사이트 GCSE scores of psychology students are consistently lower (by almost 20 per cent on average) than those of 바카라사이트 maths counterparts. It may be possible that a higher proportion of "hard" science A-level candidates actually deserve 바카라사이트 A and B grades. For if (at least statistically) I had a one-in-four chance of being awarded a grade A in a subject where 바카라사이트 average student had a 20 per cent lower GCSE score than me I would be sure to leap in!

Gareth Mines Hampton Dene, Hereford