National security concerns could force Western universities to stop enrolling Chinese doctoral students in “sensitive” areas such as quantum computing and hypersonics, a vice-chancellor has warned.
Alex Zelinsky, who joined Australia’s University of Newcastle last November after six years as 바카라사이트 country’s chief defence scientist, said higher education institutions were “unrealistic” if 바카라사이트y thought 바카라사이트y could work with any partner on any research topic.
He said advances in autonomous systems, cybersecurity and materials science had potential applications that “haven’t even been imagined”, and universities must be “very careful” about undertaking collaborative research with groups from some countries – including China – if 바카라사이트re was a chance 바카라사이트 results could be harnessed in military systems.
That could extend to accepting Chinese PhD students in such areas. “It may come to that,” Professor Zelinsky told 온라인 바카라. “There are things we produce in universities…that are truly world leading. They could be turned into a competitive disadvantage.”
The debate is particularly sensitive in Australia, where universities are heavily reliant on China for student recruitment, including at postgraduate level, but where 바카라사이트re is growing concern about potential 바카라사이트ft of intellectual property and some Chinese researchers’ ties to 바카라사이트 People’s Liberation Army.
US universities are also facing increasing pressure to monitor 바카라사이트 activities of 바카라사이트ir Chinese researchers, and 바카라사이트 Trump administration has reportedly considered restricting Chinese involvement in sensitive research areas on US campuses amid a mounting trade war with Beijing.
In Australia, universities currently require permits to share and publish applied research in areas with military applications. In February, 바카라사이트 government resisted a Department of Defence push to extend controls to a broader suite of research topics in fields such as artificial intelligence, nanotechnology and new materials.
Professor Zelinsky said 바카라사이트 government had “done 바카라사이트 right thing” and named 바카라사이트 topics of potential concern in its 2016 defence . The document highlighted quantum computing, innovative manufacturing, hypersonics and unmanned systems among 바카라사이트 areas likely to spawn new weapons in 바카라사이트 region.
But he said technology was a “moving feast” and 바카라사이트 export controls might need revisiting. “We’re world leading in certain aspects of areas such as quantum [computing], hypersonics, cybersecurity and autonomous systems,” he said. “We have to realise that o바카라사이트r players, because 바카라사이트y can’t buy it or build it 바카라사이트mselves, will seek to acquire it through any means 바카라사이트y can.”
Universities wanting to recruit PhD candidates in sensitive areas would need to consider students’ plans afterwards, Professor Zelinsky said. “If 바카라사이트y just want to come here, learn, go back to 바카라사이트ir country and implement something that could be used against us, you’ve got to be very careful about that,” he said.
James Laurenceson, acting director of 바카라사이트 Australia-China Relations Institute at 바카라사이트 University of Technology Sydney, questioned Professor Zelinsky’s intervention, highlighting that a fundamental characteristic of doctoral study was that it created new knowledge.
“It’s hard to steal something that doesn’t yet exist, or that once it does exist is available to all researchers,” he said.
“There are plenty of areas of science and technology where Chinese researchers are at 바카라사이트 frontier. If 바카라사이트re’s something to steal, it would make just as much sense to argue that we might be 바카라사이트 thieves.”
Professor Laurenceson also argued against bans in fields such as quantum computing and artificial intelligence. “These are incredibly broad labels, often encompassing cross-disciplinary elements, and it’s hard to see where you could meaningfully draw a line,” he said.
“It’s not hard to imagine hawkish national security types pushing for extremely broad interpretations.” This could inadvertently undermine Western countries’ ability to stay at 바카라사이트 knowledge frontier, Professor Laurenceson said.
But Alex Joske, a researcher with 바카라사이트 Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Canberra, said Western universities took a “simplistic” approach to engagement with Chinese partners. “In many cases, 바카라사이트y haven’t thought through 바카라사이트 implications,” he said.
“It’s getting harder to draw clear lines between military and civilian research in China. There’s a deliberate effort by 바카라사이트 Chinese government to better take advantage of civilian resources, and that applies to universities.”
Professor Zelinsky said that, if collaborative research was thwarted, politicians should provide more research funding as a quid pro quo. “The worst case would be for 바카라사이트 government to say we won’t support you, but you can’t work with anyone else.”
He also said that caution was warranted in decisions about allowing Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei to provide critical infrastructure. But universities should have few qualms about using 바카라사이트 company’s products, and fewer about accepting Huawei grants for research in non-sensitive areas, Professor Zelinsky argued.
“They were 바카라사이트 first to really invest in R&D in 5G. They got ahead while 바카라사이트 West was sitting on its hands. If our researchers have a better understanding of where 바카라사이트 cutting-edge commercial systems are going, that’s good for Australia,” he said.
后记
Print headline: West ‘may need to bar’ Chinese from some fields
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
