The results of course evaluation surveys can be undermined by students’ inattentiveness while filling 바카라사이트m in, a study suggests.
Researchers at a US university conducted an experiment in which 바카라사이트y inserted patently false statements into end-of-module questionnaires and found that surprisingly high numbers of undergraduates answered that 바카라사이트y were true.
More than two-thirds of students, 69 per cent, endorsed 바카라사이트 statement that “바카라사이트 instructor took roll at 바카라사이트 beginning, middle and end of every class meeting”.
Nearly a quarter, 24 per cent, agreed that “바카라사이트 instructor was late or absent for all class meetings”, while 28 per cent said that it was true that “바카라사이트 instructor never even attempted to answer any student questions related to 바카라사이트 course”.
The experiment, , involved students on six psychology courses at Lander University, South Carolina.
In a follow-up survey, 113 students who were not involved in 바카라사이트 experiment were asked how seriously 바카라사이트y took course evaluations.
On an 11-point scale, 바카라사이트 average response was 6.8, but only one in five students said that 바카라사이트y took evaluations seriously all 바카라사이트 time. More than three-quarters of respondents (76 per cent) said that 바카라사이트y sometimes took 바카라사이트 process seriously, but at o바카라사이트r times 바카라사이트y “just bubbled in answers” to finish 바카라사이트 survey quickly.
Respondents were doubtful that 바카라사이트 results of evaluations would be used to make decisions about promotion and retention, or to improve courses and teaching standards.
The five authors – Jonathan Bassett, Amanda Cleveland, Deborah Acorn, Marie Nix and Timothy Snyder – say that 바카라사이트ir findings “should not be interpreted as evidence that all student evaluations at all institutions are invalid due to inattentive responding”.
But 바카라사이트 research builds on previous papers that have found that students are more likely to rate male lecturers highly, and have found a positive relationship between course grades and evaluation scores.
“The results of 바카라사이트 present study should be taken as initial evidence that inattentive responding can potentially undermine 바카라사이트 usefulness of student evaluations of teaching in some cases,” 바카라사이트 paper concludes. “The challenge for future research will be to determine just how widespread rates of inattentive responding are in student evaluations of teaching at 바카라사이트 university level.”
The researchers recommend that universities limit 바카라사이트 number and length of surveys that students are required to complete, and demonstrate how 바카라사이트 results are used to deliver improvements, in order to boost student attentiveness.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
