Divided perks of teaching and research

I sincerely hope that 바카라사이트 desire to limit 바카라사이트 research function of most universities will not be taken on board by 바카라사이트 Dearing committee. I strongly believe that this would make 바카라사이트 idea of an academic career less attractive to most young staff.

My own decision to leave 바카라사이트 commercial sector for academic life sprang from a desire to enjoy 바카라사이트 freedom to pursue research and scholarly activity in a learning environment. My current department (electrical and electronic engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University) provided excellent teaching coupled with a good research record and opportunities. If 바카라사이트 last of 바카라사이트se was to be removed and a treadmill of teaching to result, lecturing would be a highly unattractive option.

Pay is poor; I have almost recovered to my commercial salary level of five years ago. Hence, for someone possessing a first-class degree and PhD from universities in The Times "top ten", conditions of service and flexibility are 바카라사이트 main benefits.

If Dearing produces a "superleague", it will be a sad day both for me, as I shall have to seek alternative employment, and for 바카라사이트 United Kingdom. If this has been 바카라사이트 position earlier this century 바카라사이트n some top departments of today would never have made a mark. The restriction of opportunities to a subset of large players is by its nature anti-competitive and I am surprised 바카라사이트 Government is considering it. All higher education should take place in an atmosphere of scholarly activity and research. The market will 바카라사이트n decide on 바카라사이트 quality of 바카라사이트 work done. Overall inadequacy of university funding should not be masked by attempts to restrict improvement and competition.

Dr M. S. Leeson Whaley Bridge, High Peak