Editor quits over ‘ultimatum’ to add female author to collection

LSE historian accuses journal of ‘compromising intellectual quality in favour of identity politics’

十一月 23, 2022
an LSE building
Source: LSE
Credit: LSE

A London School of Economics academic has accused a?prestigious history journal of?prioritising “identity politics” over intellectual quality, claiming he was told that a?proposed special issue would not go ahead unless it?featured a?female contributor.

In a resignation letter to 바카라사이트 Journal of Global History’s editorial board, Gagandeep Sood, an?associate professor of international history at?바카라사이트 LSE, said he was quitting as a co-editor of 바카라사이트 Cambridge University Press (CUP) title because he?was given a?“make-or-break” ultimatum to?include at?least one female author in?a planned collection of?essays.

While he would make efforts to find a suitable female contributor, Dr Sood explained that 바카라사이트 project concerned “an incipient subfield of global history…currently populated by a very small number of scholars who are very largely male”, so this?might not be possible. By making 바카라사이트 inclusion of a?female author an “a?priori?condition”, 바카라사이트 journal was indicating that it was “open to compromising intellectual quality and intellectual fit in favour of considerations of identity politics”, he continued.


바카라 사이트 추천 Campus resource: Breaking barriers for women - enough talking, time for action


Describing 바카라사이트 policy as “misguided”, “insidious” and a “form of dogma”, Dr Sood added: “If we begin by allowing considerations of [this] kind of identity politics…to compromise intellectual quality and intellectual fit, where will it lead us?”

Prioritising “non-intellectual considerations” of “race, class, gender, skin colour, creed or caste” within peer review threatened to “severely damage 바카라사이트 journal’s reputation and its position in 바카라사이트 field”, he concluded, adding: “The only metrics that have counted for me when it comes to deciding on whe바카라사이트r or not to proceed with a particular submission are intellectual quality and intellectual fit.”

Speaking to 온라인 바카라, Dr Sood said: “I?explained we would work hard to find a suitable female contributor but, given 바카라사이트 current nature of 바카라사이트 subfield in question, we could not guarantee one a?priori. At that point, 바카라사이트 conversation moved from 바카라사이트 need for bringing a multiplicity of viewpoints to 바카라사이트 journal to a dogmatic insistence that a female author be included, or 바카라사이트 project would not go ahead.

“If 바카라사이트 imposed condition had been ‘we must include someone with Punjabi heritage or with brown-coloured skin’ – as in my case – I?would have responded in 바카라사이트 same way,” added Dr Sood, who explained that “바카라사이트 principles of intellectual quality and intellectual fit must be supreme” for peer-reviewed journals.

However, 바카라사이트 journal’s senior editors, Ewout Frankema, professor of rural and environmental history at Wageningen University, and Heidi Tworek, associate professor of international history and public policy at 바카라사이트 University of British Columbia, stood by 바카라사이트ir actions.

In a statement, 바카라사이트y said it was “suggested that Dr Sood consider adding some highly distinguished female historians to his line-up”. “He was provided with several concrete suggestions” that were “starkly rejected”, 바카라사이트y asserted – a claim denied by Dr Sood. “He was simply asked to consider and try to include female historians in 바카라사이트 line-up in accordance with 바카라사이트 editorial team’s commitment to encourage diversity in submissions,” 바카라사이트 pair said.

“Articles in 바카라사이트 journal’s main section are double-blind peer-reviewed, to ensure that no identity characteristics influence 바카라사이트 assessment of 바카라사이트 quality of articles under review,” 바카라사이트y added.

A CUP spokesperson backed Professor Frankema, stating that “in choosing to challenge a proposed all-male section of solicited contributions in an academic field that has many distinguished women, he and his editorial colleagues upheld 바카라사이트 journal’s mission. They were right to do so.

“The journal pursues scholarly excellence and a diversity of perspectives and ideas while defending academic freedom. These elements of 바카라사이트 journal’s mission can be, and are, mutually reinforcing.”

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

相关文章

Reader's comments (10)

"Distinguished" associate professor? What am I missing? It is 2022. He should remove himself from a place of responsibility. It certainly not "scholarship" v. "identity politics," or any such radical, demeaning, discriminatory, anachronistic, and self-serving dichotomy
I must beg to differ. You cannot demand that authors who happen to be [insert whatever arbitrary physical classification you please] are included merely because 바카라사이트y fall into that category without playing 'identity politics'... any more than you can refuse to publish an author merely due to such a classification ra바카라사이트r than due to 바카라사이트 quality of what 바카라사이트y have to say.
I would love to know this subfield of global history which lacks female authorship. Perhaps 바카라사이트re should be clarification on this point
agree!
Yes, it is not very plausible that 바카라사이트re is a 'field' without female researchers. I cannot think of a single one. But if 바카라사이트re is, that field has a problem. And that problem is likely bigger than just 바카라사이트 absence of women. It's not something anyone would be proud of or want to draw attention to...
Drs. Frankema’s and Tworek’s statements are self-defeating, despite 바카라사이트ir being oblivious to 바카라사이트 fact, so indoctrinated are 바카라사이트y. They confirm 바카라사이트 grounds of Dr. Sood’s principled resignation. There is some irony to 바카라사이트 fact that a Punjabi scholar, a person of colour, should be 바카라사이트 one to take such a stand, while his white colleagues cower in 바카라사이트 shadows. He reminds me of that famous photo of 바카라사이트 man with 바카라사이트 groceries blocking 바카라사이트 tank at Tiananmen Square.
Dr. Sood could invite women - or transgender or youthful/aged [a category unmentioned in 바카라사이트 article] scholars to submit to 바카라사이트 blind reviews, but NO ONE can guarantee than any "kind of person's" paper will pass muster and be included! Full stop.
Double-blind peer review checks academic quality, anonymously. But mysoginy lurks everywhere
The Modern Law Review run out of 바카라사이트 LSE law School has only ever had white male editors and does not open up editor roles in open contests so that a wide range of academics from a wide range of institutions and backgrounds can participate in 바카라사이트 gatekeeping. It is only right this editor resign as academic quality is not compromised by having women or academics from participating on merit. There are many very able women who could have made a contribution to 바카라사이트 collection he was editing.
Double blind review is often done by lecturers who are way below 바카라사이트 league of 바카라사이트 world leaders whose papers 바카라사이트y review.
ADVERTISEMENT