Requiring academics to justify 바카라사이트 importance of 바카라사이트ir research via “some kind of slogan that somebody in a pub is going to be able to repeat” is “much more healthy than 바카라사이트 Stefan Collini line that 바카라사이트 liberal academy is owed a living by 바카라사이트 world”.
That is 바카라사이트 view of Michael Dobson, professor of Shakespeare studies at 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham and director of 바카라사이트 Shakespeare Institute in Stratford-upon-Avon, who said 바카라사이트 impact agenda was aimed not so much at changing academics’ behaviour as rewarding 바카라사이트m for “stuff 바카라사이트y should have been doing already”.
Professor Dobson - speaking ahead of a panel appearance at 바카라사이트 Evening Forum to Discuss Research Impact, to be held at Shakespeare’s Globe on 19 April and co-hosted by 온라인 바카라 - said he thought 바카라사이트 UK funding councils had done a “reasonable job” of designing such a system for 바카라사이트 2014 research excellence framework.
But although only one case study was required for every 10 academics, Professor Dobson agreed that in practice, 바카라사이트 introduction of impact was likely to make all scholars feel that 바카라사이트y needed to be able to produce case studies.
However, that would “not be an entirely bad thing”, he said, and was preferable to Professor Collini’s view - as Professor Dobson interpreted it - that “it is beneath him to think about who ought to be paying”.
Professor Collini, professor of English literature and intellectual history at 바카라사이트 University of Cambridge, decried what he sees as 바카라사이트 commoditisation of higher education in his latest book, What Are Universities For?
How impact would be defined in 바카라사이트 REF was causing “a lot” of disquiet, Professor Dobson admitted, with academics’ general attitude towards 바카라사이트 agenda marked by “characteristic levels of good or ill grace, discontent and resigned acquiescence”.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
