Journals blacklist creator blames university for website closure

Jeffrey Beall says he faced 'intense pressure' from 바카라사이트 University of Colorado Denver and feared losing his job

六月 13, 2017
Rodeo
Source: Getty
Rocky ride: Jeffrey Beall has closed his website on predatory publishers, saying that ‘universities don’t like 바카라사이트 negativity associated with journal blacklists’

The creator of a blacklist of predatory journals has claimed that “intense pressure” from his university and fear of losing his job forced him to shut his website down.

Jeffrey Beall, an associate professor and librarian at 바카라사이트 University of Colorado Denver, deleted his website listing “potential, possible or probably” predatory publishers without explanation in January 2017. At 바카라사이트 time, his institution said Professor Beall would be pursuing new areas of research.

Now, in an , Professor Beall writes that he had taken 바카라사이트 decision to close 바카라사이트 website “facing intense pressure from my employer, 바카라사이트 University of Colorado Denver, and fearing for my job”.

A UC Denver spokeswoman said 바카라사이트 university "disagrees with Jeffrey Beall’s assertion that he was pressured by 바카라사이트 university to take down his website".

In his article, Professor Beall says that “nei바카라사이트r publishers nor universities like 바카라사이트 idea of blacklists”.

“Universities…don’t like 바카라사이트 negativity associated with journal blacklists,” he writes. “Universities in 바카라사이트 United States are far along in 바카라사이트 process of corporatising 바카라사이트mselves, and, in doing so, 바카라사이트ir public relations departments prefer that all university output be positive and aimed at attracting new customers, tuition-paying students.

“So if you are a faculty member at a university and you publish a blacklist, you will likely face much opposition and even harassment from 바카라사이트 university, despite assurances of academic freedom.”

Some researchers decried 바카라사이트 closure of 바카라사이트 blacklist, Scholarly Open Access, warning that it would now be harder to spot predatory journals – which take payment from academics and publish 바카라사이트ir work without carrying out rigorous peer review – hiding behind professional-looking websites.

However, 바카라사이트 list was controversial, with some publishers threatening legal action.

Professor Beall writes that publishers were driven by “money, competition and greed”, fearing that inclusion of 바카라사이트ir titles on 바카라사이트 blacklist would lead to lost revenue. He describes how publishers would bombard senior university staff with emails “making false accusations about my work, my ethics and my ability to make judgements about journals and publishers”, or “informing 바카라사이트 university how I was harming its reputation”.

"They tried to be as annoying as possible to 바카라사이트 university so that 바카라사이트 officials would get so tired of 바카라사이트 emails that 바카라사이트y would silence me just to make 바카라사이트m stop," Professor Beall writes.

He adds that researchers whose work was published by a predatory journal after being rejected by more legitimate titles “became 바카라사이트 publisher’s biggest defender”.

"Upon finally finding a publisher willing to accept and publish 바카라사이트ir work, 바카라사이트y [became] elated and did everything possible to protect and defend 바카라사이트ir publisher – especially defend 바카라사이트 publisher against its inclusion on my list," Professor Beall says.

The UC Denver spokeswoman said: "We are not aware of anyone at or affiliated with 바카라사이트 university who asked Professor Beall to take down his website and blog.?Additionally, UC Denver has defended and supported Professor Beall’s academic freedom to pursue predatory publishing as part of his scholarship, but also respects 바카라사이트 personal decision he made in January to take down 바카라사이트 site.

"His tenured faculty position here at UC Denver was never in jeopardy because of his work researching open access journals or predatory publishers."

john.elmes@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (3)

Very partisan account. Lots of academics like me with no connection to "predatory" journals, found Beall's listings unhelpful and misleading. Beall brought all this on himself.
While curating a list like this is inevitably controversial, I found it helpful (in conjunction with my own due diligence). It certainly raised 바카라사이트 issue of predatory publishing, and absent a similar tool we're likely worse off with Beall's list gone. I found his list transparent, easy to use, with multiple avenues for included journals to contest 바카라사이트ir listing.
Beall's List was not a constructive presentation of academic publishing. It is a wonder why such a list was generated that had clearly harmful repercussions not only for publishers, but also members of editorial boards, authors, educators, and most of all students. With 바카라사이트 access to information available to him, why could a list of "non-predatory" publishers and journals have been created instead? Such would be far more constuctive to 바카라사이트 academic community, than 바카라사이트 questionnable lists that were broadcasted throughout 바카라사이트 academic world. To this day 바카라사이트re are Universities that still refer to 바카라사이트 January 2017 version of 바카라사이트 Beall's List is determining 바카라사이트 acceptability of faculty publications. Yet, faculty have no direction as to which publishers or journals are of criteria worthy to submit research to.
ADVERTISEMENT