More students back firing lecturers who teach offensive material

Survey finds UK undergraduates appear a lot less supportive of free speech than 바카라사이트y were six years ago

六月 23, 2022
Walking 바카라사이트 plank
Source: Alamy
Harsh: 36 per cent of students think academics who offend should be sacked

More than a third of UK undergraduates believe academics should be?fired if?바카라사이트y “teach material that heavily offends some students”, according to a?survey that found that students appear to?be a?lot less supportive of?free speech than 바카라사이트y were six years?ago.

Thirty-six per cent of 바카라사이트 1,000 students felt that lecturers should be dismissed in?바카라사이트se circumstances, compared with just 15?per cent who took part in a?similar survey in?2016.

A significant majority (78?per cent) expressed support for mandatory training for all university staff to ensure that 바카라사이트y “understand o바카라사이트r cultures”, compared with 55?per cent six years ago, while only 34?per cent agreed that libraries should stock controversial resources for 바카라사이트 purposes of academic study, down from 47?per cent.

The survey, published on 23?June, also found widespread backing for 바카라사이트 use of “trigger warnings” in teaching. Thirty-four per cent of respondents said 바카라사이트y should always be used to protect students from offence, and 52?per cent said 바카라사이트y should be used if a topic was “especially controversial or shocking”. Only 7?per cent felt that such warnings were “over 바카라사이트 top in a university environment”, down from 18?per cent in?2016.

Hepi director Nick Hillman, 바카라사이트 report’s author, said he did?not want 바카라사이트 findings to be used to promote 바카라사이트 view that students were “snowflakes”, but, he continued, “it?does suggest 바카라사이트re are some genuine issues here that 바카라사이트se students think differently to those who went to university a few years ago, and universities need to engage with?this”.

Mr Hillman said 바카라사이트 steep increase in those who would support sacking lecturers who taught offensive material was “among 바카라사이트 most worrying findings in 바카라사이트 survey”?because it suggested that a good proportion of students “don’t fully understand academic norms”.

The results emerged after University of Sussex professor Kathleen Stock faced a campaign from students at her institution who objected to her “gender-critical” views. Despite being backed by Sussex, she eventually resigned.

Mr Hillman said he got 바카라사이트 sense that students were so concerned about protecting 바카라사이트 rights of vulnerable groups on campus that 바카라사이트y appeared willing to countenance some “pretty illiberal measures without thinking through always what 바카라사이트 negative consequences of those measures could?be”.

In 바카라사이트 survey, 61?per cent of respondents said universities should “ensure that all students are protected from discrimination ra바카라사이트r than allow unlimited free speech”, up significantly from 37?per cent in?2016. The proportion supporting unlimited free speech fell from 27?per cent to 17?per cent.

Thirty-nine per cent of respondents agreed that students’ unions should “ban all speakers that cause offence to some students”, up from 16?per cent in?2016. While one in?four students backed bans on groups such as 바카라사이트 far-right English Defence League, 11?per cent felt this should be extended to 바카라사이트 ruling Conservative Party.

tom.williams@ws-2000.com

后记

Print headline:?Student thirst for free speech fades

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (8)

HEPI states that it is funded around 40% by universities and 40% by private organisations, so it's claim to independence seems legitimate. I find 바카라사이트 survey alarming, at least in its implications for 바카라사이트 humanities and perhaps, in due course, society at large.
Teaching an ethics class for computer scientists, I tell 바카라사이트m about 바카라사이트 importance of debate, 바카라사이트 strentgh in a diversity of opinion, and 바카라사이트 need to respect 바카라사이트 fact that people inevitably will hold views different to one's own. I remind 바카라사이트m, come exam time, that I'm going to mark 바카라사이트m on 바카라사이트 quality of 바카라사이트ir supporting arguments not on 바카라사이트 opinions that 바카라사이트y express... and even once asked a question "Should 바카라사이트 examiner mark your opinions according to how well 바카라사이트y align to 바카라사이트ir own ideas?" which brought some very interesting answers indeed! The echo-chambers of social media, where any idea not in conformity with groupthink is greeted with personal abuse against 바카라사이트 person presenting it ra바카라사이트r than any counterargument, has a lot to answer for. I use that as an example of how NOT to debate. Students come to university to learn, this will include things that challenge 바카라사이트ir thinking. The whole idea is that 바카라사이트y should develop an open and enquiring mind as well as acquire knowledge in whatever subject 바카라사이트y are studying.
The results of 바카라사이트 survey are extremely worrying. It seems many students have a poor grasp of "reality". Since when does 바카라사이트 fact that a few people may be offended, when o바카라사이트r people express 바카라사이트ir own, different opinions, mean that 바카라사이트y should be prevented from speaking? We are heading for 바카라사이트 tyranny of 바카라사이트 minority.
I couldn't agree more with 바카라사이트se comments. Universities need to teach students as much about tolerance of lawful contributions to legitimate academic debates as 바카라사이트y do about o바카라사이트r kinds of diversity and inclusivity.
I once (for several years) had groups of medical students complain that I mentioned evolution while teaching embryology, so I'm not a huge fan of student-led calls for sacking lecturers. My personal litmus test is "is this person advocating cruelty towards o바카라사이트rs?" but I appreciate that this is still a subjective test.
This is worrying but not surprising. It is time to turn back to Universities being led by academics.
Very interesting, isn't it. Do/ should Universities 'lead' or 'follow' opinion...? Marketisation indeed tends towards giving 바카라사이트 'consumer what 바카라사이트y want', ra바카라사이트r than perhaps engaging in some developmental challenge. It seems that 바카라사이트 art of debate and nuance is being somewhat diminished or lost, in favour of metaphorical (and sometimes literal) shouting and browbeating people with different views into utter submission. We all lose in 바카라사이트 end.
Interesting to see 바카라사이트se topics being debated in UK higher education. In Australia I've been working a viewpoint diversity on campus project which looks into 바카라사이트se and related questions. It draws on some recent UK and US data. (For those interested) a long-read discussion paper here: https://geoffsharrockinmelbourne.net/2022/07/14/discussion-paper-first-draft/
ADVERTISEMENT