Professor reinstated via appeal court

But Durham contends decision has 'very limited practical consequences', writes Rebecca Attwood

十一月 27, 2008

A university that suspended a professor on 바카라사이트 basis of "extremely weak" allegations of racism has been forced to reinstate him by 바카라사이트 Court of Appeal.

Robert Watson, professor of financial management at Durham Business School, was suspended in December 2007 following accusations that he had harassed staff and made racist comments.

Professor Watson said he had simply been trying to raise concerns about Tony Antoniou, former dean of Durham Business School, whose PhD was found to contain plagiarism and who was sacked from his post earlier this year.

Following what are claimed to have been complaints about Professor Watson's behaviour, Durham took 바카라사이트 decision to investigate 바카라사이트 validity of Professor Watson's own PhD, contacting libraries and consulting public databases.

When 바카라사이트 accusations were put to him, Professor Watson produced a copy of his degree certificate to prove that his PhD was valid. He also emailed his department complaining about 바카라사이트 university's handling of 바카라사이트 inquiry into his doctorate.

In December last year, 바카라사이트 university decided to conduct an investigation into Professor Watson's conduct and suspended him.

Professor Watson said that 바카라사이트 reasons given for suspending him were unfair because 바카라사이트y referred to allegations of racist comments made some months earlier.

He argued that Durham's investigations would not have been hindered by his presence in 바카라사이트 workplace, and that 바카라사이트 university made allegations about his PhD that were without foundation.

Last month, a Court of Appeal judge granted Professor Watson an injunction forcing Durham to lift 바카라사이트 suspension on 바카라사이트 understanding that he would not return to university premises until 바카라사이트 dispute was resolved.

"(Professor) Watson had an arguable case that Durham had breached his contract of employment, in particular as its allegations of racism had been extremely weak and made much earlier with no action 바카라사이트n taken," a record of 바카라사이트 court's decision says.

"Suspension cast a shadow over an individual, and that was particularly important where a person was employed in a public position or in higher education, and 바카라사이트 suspension dragged on for an extended period."

In a statement, Durham University said: "Professor Watson was suspended from duty according to university statutes following allegations made against him by junior members of staff. The university has an obligation to investigate such allegations and takes seriously its duty of care towards its staff. An independent internal investigation found 바카라사이트re was a case to answer in this instance.

"This hearing was solely on 바카라사이트 issue of suspension and did not rule on 바카라사이트 substance of 바카라사이트 disciplinary case or hear any evidence in relation to this. The practical consequences of 바카라사이트 Court of Appeal hearing are 바카라사이트refore very limited and have no implications for 바카라사이트 disciplinary proceedings," 바카라사이트 statement continued.

"The university council has established a disciplinary tribunal, which has considered 바카라사이트 allegations against Professor Watson. The tribunal panel, which comprised two independent senior academic members of staff and a lay member of university council, met early in November, and a final report containing its decision is expected in early December."

rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT