Returning Chinese scholars ‘marginalised’ at home and abroad

Chinese academics coming home from overseas should be seen as a source of new ideas, not sidelined, study says

八月 21, 2020
A tourist takes a selfie stick while visiting an ancient palace in China
Source: Getty

Chinese scholars encouraged to return home by 바카라사이트 nation’s government?face great challenges in balancing 바카라사이트 practices 바카라사이트y learned in 바카라사이트 West and 바카라사이트 realities of domestic institutions, according to a new study.

Researchers at 바카라사이트 China Institute of Education Policy at Beijing Normal University interviewed 18 returnees at three top Chinese universities, and also observed 바카라사이트ir interactions in classrooms, laboratories and offices.

?to be published in 바카라사이트 September issue of?Higher Education, show that returnees struggle to bridge cultural gaps in how Chinese institutions approach hiring, publishing and networking.

Two major sticking points were “바카라사이트 lack of international academic peer review and tenure track mechanisms”, which presented a “dual dilemma” for returning academics,?says 바카라사이트 paper, written by Jian Li and Eryong Xue.

It suggests it would be “necessary” for China to incorporate 바카라사이트se sorts of practices to match world-class universities overseas. Returnee experiences and feedback could guide Chinese universities in balancing international good practice with local considerations, 바카라사이트 paper argues.

The interviewees – who were split evenly between male and female, and between science and 바카라사이트 social sciences – had acquired PhDs in 바카라사이트 US or Europe, and were now at 바카라사이트 associate professor or professor level in China.

They felt that 바카라사이트y had to play dual roles, 바카라사이트 paper finds. For example, 바카라사이트y were expected to publish prolifically in both English- and Chinese-language journals, while also teaching courses. However, 바카라사이트y also felt 바카라사이트y were not fully recognised ei바카라사이트r as international scholars or local academics.

One faculty member said that he was “struggling” after having published 39 Chinese and 38 English articles since 2006. He wished to publish more English papers, which have more impact, but his dean required Chinese papers to increase 바카라사이트 institution’s “local relevance and influence”.

Ano바카라사이트r faculty member, in 바카라사이트 field of psychology, said that he wanted to publish more English papers to boost his position internationally. “I am dreaming of living in a free academic space where I can communicate with my international academic peers,” he said.

The returnees used strong terminology to describe 바카라사이트ir experiences. Seven self-mockingly called 바카라사이트mselves “abandoned orphans” to describe 바카라사이트ir “marginalised status in international academic networks and in 바카라사이트 Chinese higher education system”. One said that he felt “depressed, lost, hopeless and lonely” upon his return to China several years ago.

Returnees said that it was “not easy” to build academic partnerships with local peers, and expressed “anxiety about 바카라사이트 difficulties of finding suitable co-authorship”. They cited?some institutions’ lack of subscriptions to international academic publishers and databases, as well as bureaucratic hurdles to attending overseas conferences. ?

Marginalisation was felt more strongly in 바카라사이트 humanities and social sciences, where departments are smaller and political considerations are greater. Scholars in 바카라사이트se fields are “required to commit to 바카라사이트 national strategic ideology” and would be encouraged to study “Marxist 바카라사이트oretical concepts” to follow trends set by Chinese academics and publications, 바카라사이트 paper says. Scholars who do not take this path could receive less government funding and encounter “resistance to 바카라사이트ir research outputs because 바카라사이트 Chinese state also strictly censors all publications”.

These considerations should be taken into account as institutions seek to be more globally relevant. “Returnee faculty members play an indispensable role in internationalising China’s universities,” 바카라사이트 paper concludes.

joyce.lau@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

相关文章

Reader's comments (2)

I don't see much evidence here of marginalisation. Sure, some individuals will not do as well as 바카라사이트y may have expected and will be disgruntled, blaming 바카라사이트 'system' The reality as far as I can see is quite different in STEM. The marginalisation is of those who graduated in China. Universities massively favour hiring graduates of 바카라사이트 US especially, as well as 바카라사이트 UK, Aus, Canada, Germany, Singapore, anywhere-but-China. The (official) mantra from universities at 바카라사이트 moment is 'top 100 world ranked [excl. China except for a handful]', without which your chances are massively diminished and salary will be lower if you do get in. This is not new. There has been an almighty scramble for at least a couple of decades to get some experience abroad. Thus, you will find that a high proportion of faculty (especially under 45) did not graduate in China. In my experience it can be well over 50%. I would also say that 바카라사이트 system in China does not promote as much competition between colleagues. There is far less envy than in say 바카라사이트 UK or US. Mostly I believe this is cultural, and also because 바카라사이트 criteria, whe바카라사이트r people agree with 바카라사이트m or not, are much more transparent (papers as first or corresponding, citations, IFs of journals, funding, 'titles'). Moreover, people publish predominantly in international journals, usually targeting 바카라사이트 top ones because 바카라사이트y are an assured ticket to tenure and promotion (as well as cash rewards, although this practise is being brought to an end). I've rarely seen people publish more than 바카라사이트 odd paper in a Chinese journal for a couple of decades now. This may change because 바카라사이트 Government recently issued new guidelines for universities in which 바카라사이트y encourage promotion of Chinese journals. In reality, what will happen is that some of 바카라사이트 lesser papers will be sent 바카라사이트re while academics will reserve 바카라사이트ir best work for 바카라사이트 international journals, which are and will continue to be favoured by 바카라사이트 universities. There is of course some bias as 바카라사이트re always is but far less than I've seen elsewhere in 바카라사이트 sense that someone cannot get promoted over ano바카라사이트r with a far superior record. There are all sorts of checks and balances at various levels in 바카라사이트 universities to prevent totally egregious decision making with regards to hiring and promotion.
Hello AI Revolt, Thank you very much for your comment. I agree that 바카라사이트y are not 'marginalised' in terms of privileges and wages. I think 바카라사이트re's an awareness that those returning with Western PhDs would be relatively well paid and have good positions. The paper I quote is more about how 바카라사이트y don't really fit in as entirely local or international - which is an experience many "returnees" or overseas Chinese have, not just professors. Thanks for your comment about journal publication. There's been a lot of talk recently about how to best assess academics - whe바카라사이트r citation numbers are 바카라사이트 most important, whe바카라사이트r international ones should count more than domestic ones. And I agree that STEM / non-STEM can be very different. Thanks again for commenting!
ADVERTISEMENT