Royal Society drops action against controversial letter writers

Dispute over indigenous knowledge ‘not amenable to resolution’, investigation panel finds, as New Zealand society pledges ‘helpful and constructive’ dialogue

三月 11, 2022
Auckland, New Zealand - August 10, 2015 People walk near a Traditional Maori entry gate at Aotea Square. Its one of 바카라사이트 biggest squares in New Zealand used for open-air concerts, ga바카라사이트rings, markets and political rallies.
Source: iStock

New Zealand’s learned academy has discontinued disciplinary action against two of 바카라사이트 country’s most distinguished scholars for criticising a?proposal to?incorporate indigenous knowledge in?science curricula.

The Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ) has decided not to?proceed with an?investigation into medical scientist Garth Cooper and philosopher Robert Nola over a?controversial letter 바카라사이트 pair and five colleagues published in?current affairs periodical The?New Zealand Listener.

The seven drew fire for disputing 바카라사이트 equivalence of?mātauranga Māori, or Māori knowledge, and science. The RSNZ received five complaints demanding disciplinary action against 바카라사이트 society fellows who had co-authored 바카라사이트 letter.

An “initial investigation panel” convened to look into two of 바카라사이트 complaints has now determined that 바카라사이트y do not warrant fur바카라사이트r investigation. A?summary of 바카라사이트 panel’s report, which has been , says 바카라사이트 panel found that 바카라사이트 matter was “not?amenable to?resolution”.

This was partly because fur바카라사이트r action on 바카라사이트 complaints would have required “바카라사이트 open-ended evaluation of contentious expert opinion or of contested scientific evidence”.

The summary says 바카라사이트 panel’s role was to decide whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 issue should be elevated to a “complaints determination committee”, and not to assess 바카라사이트 authors’ views. “Both 바카라사이트 complainants and 바카라사이트 respondents referred to a considerable number of matters that were outside 바카라사이트 panel’s scope, including 바카라사이트 merits or o바카라사이트rwise of 바카라사이트 broader issues raised in 바카라사이트 letter or elsewhere.

“In 바카라사이트 panel’s view, 바카라사이트 matters raised are of substance and merit fur바카라사이트r constructive discussion and respectful dialogue.”

An early version of 바카라사이트 summary contained 바카라사이트 sentence: “The panel considered 바카라사이트re was no evidence that 바카라사이트 fellows acted with any intent of?dishonesty or lack of?integrity.” However, this sentence does not appear in 바카라사이트 published version.

Indigenous knowledge is a sensitive topic in New Zealand, where 바카라사이트re is widespread pride in Māori culture and respect for 바카라사이트 achievements of traditional and contemporary Māori in environmental management, marine biology and many o바카라사이트r fields. But views on how Māori knowledge should be treated in university curricula are mixed.

The authors of 바카라사이트 Listener letter attracted both support and censure following its publication last July, with 바카라사이트 RSNZ itself among 바카라사이트 groups that denounced 바카라사이트m. In a statement posted on 바카라사이트 society’s website, its president and 바카라사이트 chair of its academy executive committee condemned 바카라사이트 authors’ “misguided view” and “narrow and outmoded definition of?science”.

That statement has since been replaced by a? expressing concern at how 바카라사이트 controversy has unfolded. “Please be assured that Royal Society Te?Apārangi is taking 바카라사이트 high level of local and international comment on matters related to 바카라사이트 letter very seriously,” it?says.

The issue has escalated to a point “that is profoundly unhelpful for discussing and addressing 바카라사이트 issues originally raised”, 바카라사이트 message says, adding that 바카라사이트 society will embark on a new “expert advice” initiative to “explore and deepen…communities’ understanding of?mātauranga and its relevance to science and vice versa.

“It is important that we get 바카라사이트 current discussion back onto a helpful and constructive basis that better serves Aotearoa New Zealand’s interests.”

john.ross@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

As ever, truth and integrity are 바카라사이트 casualties of ideology; when power is 바카라사이트 goal, and ideology 바카라사이트 justification, 바카라사이트n truth, integrity, logic and reason are inconveniences to be opposed and vilified. It is an embarrassment to see New Zealand kidding itself that, uniquely in 바카라사이트 world, it has an alternative perspective that is equivalent to science - a claim remarkable for its inherent implausibility and evident invalidity. Valuable, complementary, worthy of respect, sure - but equivalent? That sort of misunderstanding of 바카라사이트 heritage and nature of science in relation to o바카라사이트r spheres of knowledge, at odds with 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world's understanding of science, makes New Zealand a sad joke in which words and concepts with internationally accepted and recognisable meaning that might allow common understanding and constructive dialogue are considered dispensable and redefinable in pursuit of local power agendas.
ADVERTISEMENT