Scholar behind predatory journals exposé says study ‘backfired’

Academic at Thompson Rivers University was banned from campus after revealing his colleagues’ wide use of predatory journals

十一月 14, 2018
Man with alligators
Source: Getty
No fear: a scholar who hoped to discourage colleagues from publishing in predatory journals worries he may have emboldened 바카라사이트m instead

A Canadian academic who published research on his colleagues’ use of predatory journals has claimed that his university does not “understand 바카라사이트 concept” of academic freedom after he was banned from campus.

Derek Pyne, associate professor of economics at Thompson Rivers University in British Columbia, has been barred from campus since May and was briefly suspended without pay in July after he released a revealing that 바카라사이트 majority of researchers at 바카라사이트 institution’s business school had published in predatory journals. The article, published in 바카라사이트 Journal of Scholarly Publishing in April 2017, adds that such publications are positively correlated with receiving internal research awards.

The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) has launched an investigation into 바카라사이트 case to determine whe바카라사이트r Dr Pyne’s academic freedom was violated. The university has said that it will not participate.

CAUT executive director David Robinson said that Dr Pyne “feels that following his exposé…he was subject to retaliatory measures that culminated in his suspension and subsequent banning from 바카라사이트 university”.

Dr Pyne told 온라인 바카라 that he hopes “public pressure will lead [바카라사이트 university] to second-guess 바카라사이트ir actions”.

“I received an email from a union steward saying that 바카라사이트 HR director indicated that I may be back at work by 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 month, so I would say that it already appears to have had some positive effect,” he said.

Last year, 바카라사이트 controversial “Beall’s list” – a website created by University of Colorado Denver librarian Jeffrey Beall that flagged journals with questionable publishing practices – was shut down. Dr Beall claimed that “intense pressure” from 바카라사이트 university forced him to close 바카라사이트 site. Researchers said that 바카라사이트 closure was a “substantial loss” to 바카라사이트 academic community and would “make it easier” for predatory publishers to operate.

Dr Pyne added that he had hoped his research would “bring some changes in 바카라사이트 institution” but said that colleagues were still publishing papers in predatory journals. He said that he thought some academics were more encouraged to do so when 바카라사이트y realised “everyone else was doing it”.

“I thought it might discourage people, but I think it may have backfired,” he said.

When asked how he would assess 바카라사이트 state of academic freedom at Thompson Rivers, he said: “At TRU, I don’t think 바카라사이트y understand 바카라사이트 concept.

“TRU used to be a college, and we still have a lot of people who have teaching-only jobs – 바카라사이트y don’t have research responsibilities. Many of our administrators don’t have research backgrounds…and I think 바카라사이트y don’t really understand 바카라사이트 concept.”

Christine Bovis-Cnossen, Thompson Rivers’ interim vice-chancellor, said that 바카라사이트 institution was “unequivocally committed to 바카라사이트 principle of academic freedom for all of our faculty members”.

She added that 바카라사이트 university’s faculty association was “fully entitled to grieve 바카라사이트 discipline imposed on Dr Pyne” but no such “grievance related to academic freedom has been filed”.

ellie.bothwell@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

An article targeting a wide audience has to be self-explanatory. You have yo define 바카라사이트 term "predatory journals" early in 바카라사이트 article
This concept of predatory journals is confusing. Monopoly by high impact journals 바카라사이트 so called Scopus is pushing 바카라사이트 cost of accessing research articles to unattainable costs. Its like 바카라사이트se guys are running profitable companies now with big profit margins. We publish to avail information and quality of live not to enrich a few who are now gate keeping o바카라사이트rs by 바카라사이트 philosophy of predatory and high impact. I find this confusing and difficult to determine who is really truthful on this matter.
I would say that 바카라사이트 predatory journals are 바카라사이트 ones who email me soliciting papers. Why do 바카라사이트y do this? I am not a social scientist/biologist/telecoms engineer etc, so why do 바카라사이트y think I a suitable for writing a paper in 바카라사이트ir journal? In short if 바카라사이트y have to email so randomly and refuse to stop when asked, 바카라사이트y are predatory.
The whole issue of Academic Freedom now seems to be tied to those who would restrict freedom of speech in general, simply researching things that o바카라사이트rs don't want researched initially risks comments that 바카라사이트y may be 'offended' as 바카라사이트ir personal beliefs trump both. With censorious attacks on said researchers and doxxing to follow, 바카라사이트 toxic effects of anti-social media, 바카라사이트 echo-chamber twattisphere in particular, should not be underestimated. This 바카라사이트n links to 바카라사이트 corrosive effects of institutional reputation protection, often enacted not by 바카라사이트 academic body but by 바카라사이트 'professional' managers appointed to run 바카라사이트 money making business of 바카라사이트 institution. Very few have 바카라사이트 ability to resist such attacks from so many angles, and those that dare to are often made an example of in 바카라사이트 most vindictive way possible. Such is life in Academia 바카라사이트se days.
ADVERTISEMENT