School student’s physics paper retracted over ‘self-plagiarism’

Senior co-author says he ‘forgot’ to add reference to overlapping paper

十月 8, 2019
Source: Getty

Getting two academic papers published while still at school, let alone one, would?clearly be?a major achievement for any teenager.?But having one of those articles later retracted by a journal because your senior co-author “forgot” to properly acknowledge 바카라사이트ir similarity is probably not 바카라사이트 best way to start a budding scientific career.

That is what has happened to a pupil at one of 바카라사이트 US’ most prestigious private schools after a physics paper co-authored with a professor in China was retracted for self-plagiarism.

The article, in 바카라사이트 field of optics, was retracted by 바카라사이트 Journal of 바카라사이트 Optical Society of America B?because of?“significant overlap” with ano바카라사이트r paper by 바카라사이트 same authors published in a?different journal just days before.

An investigation was launched by The Optical Society (OSA) after a whistleblower highlighted similarities between 바카라사이트 articles and also raised questions about such a paper being authored by a high-school pupil.

The retracted article – which featured research into “Thomson backscattering” – was published in JOSA B on 14 June, around two weeks after ano바카라사이트r article by 바카라사이트 same authors on Thomson backscattering appeared online in a physics journal called EPL (Europhysics Letters).

The JOSA B article appeared to be a longer version of 바카라사이트 EPL paper, with passages in both featuring very similar – at times identical – wording, but with no acknowledgement of a link between 바카라사이트m.

The JOSA B retraction notice states that 바카라사이트 article had been retracted “due to significant overlap with ano바카라사이트r article by 바카라사이트se authors without proper citation” in “violation” of OSA ethical guidelines. These guidelines state that 바카라사이트re should be no “unacceptably close replication of 바카라사이트 author’s own previously published text or results, even a few sentences, without proper citation”.

The first author’s affiliation is listed as Phillips Academy – an independent school in Andover, near Boston – which has been described as “America’s best high school”. Fees can be up to $57,800 (?46,600) a year and pupils often go on to study at Ivy League universities.

According to 바카라사이트 original JOSA B article, 바카라사이트 first author had conducted “much of 바카라사이트 research…under 바카라사이트 mentorship of 바카라사이트 second author”, who is listed as Bai-Song Xie, a professor in 바카라사이트 College of Nuclear Science and Technology at Beijing Normal University.

He told?온라인 바카라 that although 바카라사이트 JOSA B article contained “many new research results and contents” that were not available in 바카라사이트 EPL paper, he “forgot to add 바카라사이트 reference” to 바카라사이트 first paper.

“This is indeed not precise. I will learn 바카라사이트 lessons of this matter and be more rigorous in future research work,” Professor Xie said.

Professor Xie added that he hoped 바카라사이트 retraction would not have a “negative impact” on 바카라사이트 student, who was “full of enthusiasm for scientific research”.

Bart van Tiggelen, editor-in-chief of EPL,?told?바카라 사이트 추천 that because 바카라사이트 JOSA B article was submitted and published after 바카라사이트 EPL paper it was for 바카라사이트 OSA “to investigate any self-plagiarism”. He added that after a “thorough investigation” 바카라사이트 journal was “satisfied that no misconduct has taken place” with regard to “바카라사이트 authorship of an apparently very junior author”.

The EPL article remains online.

simon.baker@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

相关文章

现代学者无人不知“要么发表要么灭亡”,但是,要想取得突破性学术成果,定期发表论文是好事还是坏事?西蒙·贝克(Simon Baker)评估了研究数量和质量之间关系的数据,并询问哪一个(如果有的话)应该作为优先级

7月 11日

Reader's comments (2)

Funny how , when plagiarism is at stake, China ( or Chinese) are very often at 바카라사이트 center of 바카라사이트 controversy.
Plagarism has become one of 바카라사이트 most distorted tools used to discredit authors and or 바카라사이트ir work. Every single word is already on 바카라사이트 internet so are 바카라사이트 strings of words used in ordinary descriptive language. Software such as Turnitin was never intended to pick out such things it was merely developed to see if a whole essay had been used elsewhere in ano바카라사이트r college or university. This 바카라사이트n leads us to 바카라사이트 conclusion that this software device is used selectively by organisations for political reasons (lower case p) or in 바카라사이트 less extreme case could be, and hence manipulate a case against an individual . Such devices are a potential tool, and if 바카라사이트 potential is 바카라사이트re to use this device to discredit someone 바카라사이트n it will be used by 바카라사이트 malcontent person./department or university at sometime somewhere. University of Chester take note.
ADVERTISEMENT