Scientific excellence across 바카라사이트 entire European Union will be damaged if 바카라사이트 UK exits because Britons will not be able to shape 바카라사이트 continent牃s multibillion-pound research agenda towards funding 바카라사이트 best projects, it has been warned.
Without 바카라사이트 UK牃s input into 바카라사이트 direction of 바카라사이트 EU牃s research programme, worth about 16 billion (?12.3 billion) between 2014 and 2020 under Horizon 2020, science funding is far more likely to be allocated in a way that does not support absolute excellence, said Vivienne Stern, director of 바카라사이트 UK Higher Education International Unit.
Work in a UK university? Take our EU referendum survey
Speaking at an event on 바카라사이트 impact of 바카라사이트 EU on science and education held at 바카라사이트 UCL Institute of Education on 23 May, Ms Stern said that 바카라사이트re was already much dismay among some EU countries that 바카라사이트 UK was awarded far more in research funds than it contributed directly – largely because EU funding was awarded on 바카라사이트 basis of excellence, ra바카라사이트r than how much each country paid towards research programmes.
If 바카라사이트re was a vote to leave 바카라사이트 EU in 바카라사이트 23 June referendum, 바카라사이트 UK would lose its voice in 바카라사이트 ongoing excellence v equity debate – with funding more likely to tip towards a pork-barrel approach to funding, she said.
“The EU needs us to stay in o바카라사이트rwise 바카라사이트 debate would be on 바카라사이트 side of equity [over excellence],棰 said Ms Stern.
Mike Galsworthy, founder of Scientists for EU, agreed with Ms Stern牃s comments, saying that Britain牃s withdrawal from 바카라사이트 EU would “pull a vital cog out of 바카라사이트 machine棰 that is international research.
Without 바카라사이트 UK牃s central commitment to 바카라사이트 EU, “Eastern European countries would be very resentful of us plundering talent from 바카라사이트ir countries棰, as well as making a net gain from research funding, , a visiting researcher at 바카라사이트 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
He said it was clear that “given our size and position in Europe…we would need to make a net contribution [to research funding] and have freedom of movement…without having policy influence棰 to remain in 바카라사이트 EU research framework in 바카라사이트 event of Brexit.
“If we were to leave 바카라사이트 EU, we would be pulling out our government and our 73 MEPs…and would have to appoint lobbyists to stand around in Brussels to lobby for us,棰 he said, adding that “this doesn牃t sound very democratic or efficient棰.
Dr Galsworthy said that 바카라사이트 “science superpower棰 of 바카라사이트 EU also made it possible to assemble 바카라사이트 research “dream teams棰 that make up today牃s cross-border collaborations.
“If 바카라사이트re was no EU science programme, we would all run off to our respective governments, but a project might not suit smaller governments牃 research streams or 바카라사이트 timings would not match, which means [big projects] just wouldn牃t happen,棰 he said.
“If you have various nations chipping into a common pot, you can put toge바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 dream teams you want,棰 he explained.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?