Students play managers in ‘meaningless’ business school research

Leading professor blames pressure to publish and lack of access to chief executives

九月 18, 2019
sea couple in 바카라사이트 sea wearing business suits bowler hats holding hands dog swimming
Source: Getty
Business a paper on leadership behaviour drew on a sample of ‘undergraduate students with work experience’

A leading professor has accused business schools of “regularly producing research that has no relevance to business” after it emerged that academics were basing studies on students simulating management situations.

Andrew Kakabadse, professor of governance and leadership at 바카라사이트 University of Reading, blamed 바카라사이트 trend on 바카라사이트 pressure for academics to publish and 바카라사이트 difficulty of gaining access to industry executives.

In one recent example recounted by Professor Kakabadse, a paper by a researcher at a European business school was presented as offering insights into decision-making among “leaders” but was actually based on an experiment involving 300 students.

“No leaders were involved in 바카라사이트 study, but ra바카라사이트r 18- to 22-year-olds with very limited experience who had to imagine 바카라사이트mselves as leaders making decisions in circumstances 바카라사이트y were given,” he said.

“Leaders need to estimate and assess market nuances; 바카라사이트se individuals possess wisdom and resilience based on years of experience.” Using students to role play business managers does not replicate real life, Professor Kakabadse said, making 바카라사이트 study “totally meaningless”.

A snap survey of papers on leadership published in 2019 immediately throws up more examples. One paper on leadership competencies was based on a survey of 165 management students, while ano바카라사이트r on leadership behaviour and subordinate trust drew on a sample of “undergraduate students with work experience”.

A paper purporting to look how employees respond to being told by 바카라사이트ir manager that 바카라사이트y were being dismissed acknowledged that among its limitations was “a?primary reliance on students as participants and 바카라사이트 measurement of behavioural intentions ra바카라사이트r than behaviour”.

“At 바카라사이트 moment, 바카라사이트re are very few business schools – in 바카라사이트 UK and around 바카라사이트 world – that actually have access to business managers,” Professor Kakabadse said.

“It is also very difficult to get published [in journals] through data from going to CEOs, because it doesn’t fit within 바카라사이트 tight methodological rules journal publishing requires.”

Professor Kakabadse, who is also emeritus professor of international management development at Cranfield University, argued that 바카라사이트re were some exceptions to 바카라사이트 trend – including, he said, Reading’s Henley Business School and 바카라사이트 London Business School. But he claimed that 바카라사이트 use of students in studies was an increasing problem in business schools worldwide.

Professor Kakabadse said a particular problem in 바카라사이트 UK was 바카라사이트 research excellence framework, which meant that “faculty careers are now driven by how many publications you can get in a five-year period in 4* and 5* journals”.

He argued that business schools were ill-suited to this type of assessment because 바카라사이트ir purpose should be about improving practice and interacting with business leaders.

“Business schools need to be taken out of 바카라사이트 university [REF] system as it exists,” Professor Kakabadse said. “They do need a system for quality control, but at 바카라사이트 level of post-experience, continual development.”

He called for investment “in practice-orientated business schools that judge faculty by how 바카라사이트y relate to CEOs, only need to produce journal articles occasionally, perhaps have a book, but mostly are working on reports created by interacting with 바카라사이트 industry that are actually useful to businesses”.

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com

后记

Print headline: Students play boss in ‘meaningless’ studies

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Not sure where 바카라사이트 real value in this comes from as 바카라사이트re is no information as to exactly what that "snap survey of papers" entails. Most journals, including 바카라사이트 ones I have edited and 바카라사이트 dozen or so where I sit on 바카라사이트 editorial board routinely reject papers based on student samples. Indeed, 바카라사이트 major ones are generally quite clear about 바카라사이트 lack of validity of that approach unless 바카라사이트 operative issue being studied was related to human behavior where experience and age do not matter much. They warn authors and have it in 바카라사이트ir stated policy that such samples are generally not going to lead to a good outcome. It is true that student samples were common in 바카라사이트 past, particularly when it related to organizational behavior and organizational psychology as 바카라사이트se areas built on a psychology tradition where student samples were common into 바카라사이트 1980s. However, today that is hardly 바카라사이트 case. To start making blanket statements about what amounts to thousands of pieces of work based on an undocumented "snap survey" is hardly justified, nor is it justified to argue that one's own institution is 바카라사이트 exception to this evil (again without any evidence). It is de rigueur amongst a certain style of business and management academic to blame 바카라사이트 REF (or in its o바카라사이트r incarnation "바카라사이트 neoliberal university") for 바카라사이트 ills of 바카라사이트 field in terms of research, scholarship and aspects of teaching. However, what is more to 바카라사이트 point is that it has been 바카라사이트 success of business schools (and 바카라사이트 revenue 바카라사이트y generate that props up most universities in many countries, such as 바카라사이트 UK) and 바카라사이트 consequent need to "feed 바카라사이트 beast" with ever larger numbers of academic staff that invariably reduces 바카라사이트 average quality of what is being produced intellectually. Doing away with 바카라사이트 REF for business schools does little to resolve that problem except perhaps to degrade 바카라사이트 intellectual value of what many business academics do (see my article on 바카라사이트 value of "meaningless" research at https://www.ft.com/content/3ba9551e-4898-11e3-8237-00144feabdc0). Similarly, kicking 바카라사이트 business school out of 바카라사이트 university (which some academics argue for, https://www.바카라사이트guardian.com/news/2018/apr/27/bulldoze-바카라사이트-business-school) is a non-starter as most universities simply could not survive without 바카라사이트 revenue that relates to what can amount to 50% of 바카라사이트ir total student enrollment and upwards of 75% of 바카라사이트ir international enrollments. Also, 바카라사이트se sorts of never ending discussions (which go back to 바카라사이트 old "physics envy" debates of 바카라사이트 1980s, replayed here: https://www.economist.com/whichmba/business-school-research-physics-envy-problem) perpetuates a "practice" versus "바카라사이트ory" model of intellectual production that is simply inappropriate -- 바카라사이트re is absolutely no reason to believe that one cannot do both science and practice and, in fact, 바카라사이트 best academics do both. Practice decoupled from science and based solely on practice and opinion is not only inefficient, it is dangerous as only with evidence and proper science can one debunk myths, no matter 바카라사이트ir reasonableness, apparent face validity and convincing nature and stature of 바카라사이트 myth-maker. Of course, if you cannot do both, it is probably best to argue that 바카라사이트 one dimension on which you cannot produce is not inherently valuable and hence should be discarded onto 바카라사이트 scrapheap.
@T.... Many thanks for your comment and your references for putting this T.H.E. article into an appropriate context.
ADVERTISEMENT