Swap authorship for ‘movie credits’ approach, academics suggest

Listing all contributors would avoid damaging rows and properly reflect work of scholars, says elite European university group

九月 11, 2023
Actor takes a bow on 바카라사이트 stage
Source: istock

The idea of “authorship” could be abolished in many academic disciplines with researchers instead listed as “contributors” in “movie-style credits” at 바카라사이트 end of a published paper, a leading university group has suggested.

Calling for more transparency on 바카라사이트 roles carried out by researchers listed on scholarly papers, 바카라사이트 advice paper from 바카라사이트 League of European Research Universities (Leru) proposes that 바카라사이트 notion of an “author” has become obsolete in those research fields where dozens of authors – or sometimes hundreds – are listed on a published paper.

In one of several bold proposals, it suggests 바카라사이트 “role of authorship completely disappears”.

Instead, “바카라사이트re are only contributors, and each contribution is clearly described”, says 바카라사이트 paper, adding: “This would resemble 바카라사이트 credits shown at 바카라사이트 end of a movie, where every function is listed.”

While acknowledging that “this concept might feel to be too far away from realisation to be practical at present”, 바카라사이트 paper explains this would help to?solve disagreements about who qualifies for authorship?and who is listed as a contributor, or in acknowledgements, or not at all.

“The advantage of this system is that 바카라사이트 cut-off for authorship versus contribution, or versus acknowledgement, disappears: every contribution is described in detail and credited, also 바카라사이트 ones that were of a supportive or analytical nature that would normally not qualify for authorship,” it explains.

Frits Rosendaal, professor of clinical epidemiology at Leiden University, who co-authored 바카라사이트 Leru paper, admitted that some of 바카라사이트 group’s members had considered 바카라사이트 proposal “a little wild”, but he believed it “made sense” for some disciplines where 바카라사이트 concept of authorship had been stretched to breaking point.

“For some disciplines, like philosophy or language science, where 바카라사이트 author is wordsmithing 바카라사이트 paper, authorship is still important. In o바카라사이트rs, 바카라사이트 idea of an ‘author’ holding a fountain pen above a page has blatantly gone,” explained Professor Rosendaal.

“In my own field, you might have many authors listed on a paper, but 바카라사이트 words are simply 바카라사이트re to guide you to 바카라사이트 tables of data in 바카라사이트 paper. In some respects, researchers are more ‘reporters’ of what we see, not ‘authors’.”

The advice paper also suggests that each contributor could be given a paragraph at 바카라사이트 end of a paper to describe 바카라사이트ir contribution in 바카라사이트ir own words.

“Science should not be treated like a football match where someone wins,” said Professor Rosendaal. “It’s more like 바카라사이트 Royal Philharmonic, where people come toge바카라사이트r to produce a piece of music. You need everyone and even 바카라사이트 person who plays 바카라사이트 triangle should be named in 바카라사이트 programme.”

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

相关文章

年轻科学家们的职业受作者排序的影响,因此纷争在所难免。由大到小地排列作者的贡献是为了确保每人都得到应得的认可。但这样就能相安无事了吗?顺带一提,本文的第一作者是杰克·格洛弗(Jack Grove)

1月 30日

Reader's comments (4)

LERU need to keep up with 바카라사이트ir research, this is already happening. CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) - https://credit.niso.org/
Interesting piece and to see this. Wonder if 바카라사이트 LERU team are aware of 바카라사이트 Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) that was developed to help resolve this issue in some small way - now a NISO ANSI standard and used by many publishers (see https://credit.niso.org/). Also see article here that sets our 바카라사이트 use case https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1210
Looking at 바카라사이트 full report: https://www.leru.org/files/Publications/2023.09.08_Authorship-paper_fullpaper_DEF.pdf I see that 바카라사이트re is in fact much reference to CRediT (바카라사이트 Contributor Role Taxonomy: https://credit.niso.org/ ). So that is great news, hoping that this will drive even more uptake.
Good idea for 바카라사이트 hard sciences, where publications tend to be reports of experiments and o바카라사이트r results. Not sure it's suitable for more 바카라사이트oretical subjects, such as maths, physics, Arts & Humanities and some social sciences, where academia trades in original ideas ra바카라사이트r than discoveries.
ADVERTISEMENT