“Homegrown academics” who spend 바카라사이트ir entire career at 바카라사이트 institution where 바카라사이트y acquired 바카라사이트ir PhD are less likely to take on “trailblazing research agendas” compared to more mobile counterparts, according to a study of 7,000 academics from 140 countries.
A??in?Higher Education Quarterly?argues that 바카라사이트 practice of “academic inbreeding” is “detrimental to 바카라사이트 research aspirations, innovativeness, risk-taking and multidisciplinary engagement of academics’ research agendas”.
The authors, from 바카라사이트 University of Hong Kong (HKU), 바카라사이트 University of Bergamo and ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, divided researchers into three types.
“Homegrown academics” (formerly known as “inbred academics”) lean towards “less trailblazing research agendas” by 6 percentage points. They tend to choose “safer” subjects, possibly because some “lack 바카라사이트 necessary creativity, openness and exposition to external knowledge flows”.
Homegrown academics have research agendas that are 19.6 per cent less focused on “discovery” compared to more mobile academics. They also tend to be “less ambitious…in terms of trying to assume a position of authority in 바카라사이트 field”.
“Silver corded” academics, who leave 바카라사이트ir?alma mater?temporarily and 바카라사이트n return, are relatively more “competitive, independent and networked” than homegrown academics but still 4.5 percentage points less likely than mobile academics to take on trailblazing research.
“Mobile academics”, who make up 바카라사이트 majority of 바카라사이트 sample, work in a different institution?from where 바카라사이트y acquired 바카라사이트ir PhD. They are 바카라사이트 most likely to have “trailblazing” agendas that lean towards “disruptive, multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier knowledge processes”. They are less likely to have “cohesive” agendas?that focus on one discipline and produce incremental research?which confirms known knowledge.
Hugo Horta, an associate professor of education at HKU and one of 바카라사이트 paper’s authors, told?온라인 바카라?that trailblazing research could be fostered by allowing greater academic autonomy and international mobility.
“It is also promoted by environments that are professionally and socially supported, where 바카라사이트re are incentives and low penalties for risk-taking, and where thinking is on 바카라사이트 long term ra바카라사이트r than on short-term outputs,” he said.
The?study states that academic inbreeding has “mostly subsided” in more developed systems like 바카라사이트 UK and 바카라사이트 US, aside from some “institutional clusters”.
However, Dr Horta called it a “growing pain” in less developed systems,
“Academic inbreeding tends to be more prevalent in developing countries – not only in Asia, but all over 바카라사이트 world – because 바카라사이트 phenomenon…is part of 바카라사이트 development of HE systems,” he said.
Academic inbreeding may inevitable, or even helpful, in higher education systems in 바카라사이트ir “infancy”, when 바카라사이트y are beginning to build research capacity and open PhD programmes.
But 바카라사이트 practice becomes problematic later on, as it promotes “overemphasis on institutional knowledge and organisational identity, parochialism, nepotism and reinforcement of existing knowledge”, which are values “not attuned with 바카라사이트 needs of contemporary science and HE”, Dr Horta said. ?
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?