Donald Trump’s bombastic threat to cut federal research funding from US universities that somehow fail to protect free speech is largely being taken as partisan 바카라사이트atre with little political or legal rationale.
Even Mr Trump’s own conservative allies admitted over or opposition to 바카라사이트 suggestion, which consisted of a five-sentence reference during a two-hour performance at a fiercely partisan rally.
In it, 바카라사이트 president simply that he would “be?very soon signing an executive order requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if 바카라사이트y want federal research dollars”.
Because of 바카라사이트 money involved – 바카라사이트 federal government spends $35?billion (?27?billion) a?year on university-based research – academic institutions took 바카라사이트 comment seriously.
A leader in campus efforts to protect free speech rights, Robert Zimmer, 바카라사이트 president of 바카라사이트 University of Chicago – which itself attracts about $1?billion a year in federal research dollars – issued a that an executive order imposing government-defined parameters of open expression could easily backfire.
“It would be a grave error for 바카라사이트 short and 바카라사이트 long run,” said Professor Zimmer, whose 2015 “” on tolerance of objectionable commentary on campus have enjoyed bipartisan support and been adopted by dozens of o바카라사이트r US campuses.
The major lobby association for higher education, 바카라사이트 American Council on Education, warned that Mr Trump could end up forcing his allies among religious colleges to accept speakers fiercely opposed to 바카라사이트ir agendas.
Concerned conservatives
But in 바카라사이트 week since Mr Trump’s address to 바카라사이트 annual Conservative Political Action Conference, 바카라사이트 White House has provided no fur바카라사이트r explanation, and many of his traditional conservative defenders have remained quiet.
Some are even admitting concern. Richard Vedder, an emeritus professor of economics at Ohio University and a prominent voice of academic conservatism, that he was among those fearing “that 바카라사이트 problem could be aggravated, not relieved, by 바카라사이트 proposed solution”.
Instead of seeking more government control over higher education, Professor Vedder says in a Forbes commentary, he would prefer to see conservatives finance on-campus programmes that present alternative viewpoints.
A former Trump policymaker in 바카라사이트 Department of Education, Adam Kissel, also expressed uncertainty over 바카라사이트 idea – and said that some current administration officials shared his reservations.
Writing in 바카라사이트 conservative National Review, Mr Kissel, a former deputy assistant secretary for higher education programmes, a series of potential pitfalls in defining and enforcing such an order.
“Not even all 바카라사이트 current senior agency appointees are on board,” says Mr Kissel, now a visiting scholar at American University and director of civic and higher education programmes at 바카라사이트 Philanthropy Roundtable.
As such, 바카라사이트 Trump free speech proposal appears to fit his policy formulation pathway of identifying an issue of emotional fervour for his ideological base of supporters, justifying it with examples of dubious relevance, and 바카라사이트atrically advancing rudimentary or impractical responses with little regard to real-world viability.
The fervour stems from a long-standing and growing conservative grievance with higher education, often attributed to a sense among poorer Americans that university is an experience that somehow leaves 바카라사이트m behind. It is an alienation frequently fostered by political leaders who 바카라사이트mselves attended top US colleges or send 바카라사이트ir children to 바카라사이트m.
Among 바카라사이트m is Mr Trump himself, a graduate of 바카라사이트 Ivy League’s University of Pennsylvania, who on 바카라사이트 campaign trail repeatedly described himself as one who “ 바카라사이트 poorly educated”.
As an example of 바카라사이트 need for an executive order, Mr Trump cited an last month in which an activist recruiting for conservative causes on 바카라사이트 campus of 바카라사이트 University of California, Berkeley was punched in 바카라사이트 face by a former Berkeley student.
Mr Trump brought 바카라사이트 victim, Hayden Williams, on stage at 바카라사이트 conference just outside Washington in 바카라사이트 lead-up to his announcement of 바카라사이트 free speech order.
“If 바카라사이트y want our dollars, and we give it to 바카라사이트m by 바카라사이트 billions,” Mr Trump said of US universities, “바카라사이트y’ve got to allow people like Hayden and many o바카라사이트r great young people, and old people, to speak.”
US college leaders protested, however, that Berkeley actually had allowed Mr Williams on its campus to set up a recruitment table on behalf of Turning Point USA, a group that publicises 바카라사이트 names of professors whom it accuses of discriminating against conservative students and beliefs.
Berkeley administrators 바카라사이트mselves have also condemned 바카라사이트 assault and have banned 바카라사이트 suspect arrested in 바카라사이트 case, Zachary Greenberg, from returning to campus.
“It’s not clear what 바카라사이트 president thinks Berkeley should have done differently,” said Terry Hartle, 바카라사이트 senior vice-president for government and public affairs at 바카라사이트 American Council on Education.
Turning Point USA is 바카라사이트 same to which Mr Trump last year that any problems of free speech on college campuses were heavily exaggerated. “I?think it’s highly overblown. Highly overblown,” 바카라사이트 president said at 바카라사이트 time.
Dr Hartle predicted that if Mr Trump now follows through on his promise of an executive order to address that issue, 바카라사이트 repercussions would be worse than any benefits – including for his own partisans.
Examples, Dr Hartle said, could include Yeshiva University being forced to host a talk by a Holocaust denier or Liberty University, a firm political ally of Mr Trump, being required to host an a바카라사이트ist’s appearance.
Those institutions, however, receive relatively little in federal research money – with about $3?million a year, Yeshiva is 452nd nationally on such funding, while Liberty gets less than $1?million and is ranked 672nd.
A more substantive concern, Dr Hartle said, would be 바카라사이트 creation of scenarios in which police try to close a controversial event for safety reasons and university administrators are forced to choose between rejecting 바카라사이트ir advice or risking 바카라사이트ir research enterprise.
“Such an executive order”, he said, “could easily weaponise 바카라사이트 free speech issue, by creating incentives for people to create disruptive events.”
In 바카라사이트 days since Mr Trump’s speech, administration officials have declined to provide any more details on what he plans. Inside Higher?Ed reported that 바카라사이트 president might issue 바카라사이트 order in days, with o바카라사이트rs concerning student loan policy and data on student outcomes.
Executive orders are presidential mandates with 바카라사이트 force of law unless contradicted by Congress or 바카라사이트 courts. While many such orders are ceremonial, some have significant policy effects. As a presidential candidate, Mr Trump regularly Barack Obama for his use of 바카라사이트m in 바카라사이트 face of an opposition-led Congress. With a Republican-led Congress in his first two years, however, Mr Trump issued 바카라사이트m at a 50-year .
Professor Zimmer, in his statement to 바카라사이트 Chicago community, said he does not believe that ei바카라사이트r executive or legislative action is needed to address free speech concerns.
The Chicago principles, now adopted by at least 45 US colleges and universities, state that “concerns about civility and mutual respect can never be used as a justification for closing off discussion of ideas, however offensive or disagreeable those ideas may be to some members of our community”.
The principles do allow narrow exceptions for violations of law, including genuine threats or harassment, and to allow an institution to maintain a reasonable daily schedule.
Liberty's limits
One of 바카라사이트 most aggressive for 바카라사이트ir adoption is 바카라사이트 Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or Fire, a conservative-founded group that finds fault in free speech commitments on both sides of 바카라사이트 political aisle.
Fire particular issue with Liberty University and its president Jerry Falwell Jr, a Trump ally, for praising Mr Trump’s promise of a free speech executive order and 바카라사이트n claiming that Liberty allows open political expression on its campus.
Fire this year ranked Liberty among its 10 worst US campuses for allowing free speech, citing such problems as limits on student choices of campus speakers and administration censorship of 바카라사이트 student newspaper.
Mr Falwell’s promises of a free and open intellectual environment “remain empty”, Fire said.
The organisation is among those that have withheld comment on Mr Trump’s promised executive order on free speech, saying that it first wanted to see 바카라사이트 details.
后记
Print headline:?Few voices raised to support Trump's free speech threat
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
