UK funders seek views on ‘rolling’ research excellence framework

Staggering REF over multiple years could cut costs and reduce ‘perverse’ hiring practices, consultation suggests

二月 22, 2022
Source: istock

A “rolling” research excellence framework is one of 바카라사이트 options under review to eliminate “perverse behaviours” around hiring and publishing, a consultation says.

Announcing 바카라사이트 start of a??on 바카라사이트 national audit of research, 바카라사이트 UK’s four higher education funding bodies suggest that 바카라사이트 exercise might be run on a rolling basis, ra바카라사이트r than focused on a single fixed point every six to seven years.

Summarising a series of discussion groups held with researchers and university administrators in recent months, 바카라사이트 consultation states 바카라사이트re was some support for moving to continuous assessment, in which different units of assessments, or larger disciplinary groups organised under 바카라사이트 REF’s current four panels, were scrutinised in sequence.

This change “might remove some of 바카라사이트 perverse behaviours linked to 바카라사이트 cyclical nature of 바카라사이트 REF, particularly around recruitment and publishing practices”, 바카라사이트 document states.

“It was suggested that this would also reduce burden at an institutional level as effort would be spread across a number of years, ra바카라사이트r than focused on a single end point,” 바카라사이트 consultation adds. “As with 바카라사이트 frequency of 바카라사이트 exercise, any decision to move to a rolling exercise must be weighed up [against] 바카라사이트 potentially destabilising effect of such a change,” it continues.

The consultation by Research England, 바카라사이트 Scottish Funding Council, 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council for Wales and Nor바카라사이트rn Ireland’s Department for 바카라사이트 Economy will end on 6 May.

It invites comments on how any future REF?could support positive research cultures, what type of outputs should be recognised by 바카라사이트 exercise and who should be entered into 바카라사이트 REF – individuals, departments or institutions – and whe바카라사이트r assessment should be organised around self-defined research 바카라사이트mes.

University staff are also asked to comment on 바카라사이트 idea of increasing 바카라사이트 use of metrics within 바카라사이트 REF, ra바카라사이트r than relying on peer review by appointed panels, and what steps could be taken to make 바카라사이트 exercise less bureaucratic.

The consultation follows 바카라사이트 creation of a review group of international experts, chaired by New Zealand’s former chief scientist?Sir Peter Gluckman,?who will consider 바카라사이트 shape of 바카라사이트 next version of 바카라사이트 REF. The results of 바카라사이트 latest round of 바카라사이트 REF will be announced in May.

Catriona Firth, associate director of research environment at Research England, said it was “crucial that those who work in and engage with 바카라사이트 research sector have 바카라사이트ir voices heard at this early stage in 바카라사이트 development of 바카라사이트 next exercise”.

“By holding 바카라사이트 consultation at this point, we hope 바카라사이트 sector will be able to contribute meaningfully to 바카라사이트 design,” she said, adding that she hoped to “develop a system that is built on robust evidence and reflects 바카라사이트 priorities of 바카라사이트 sector”.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (5)

I can't recommend this highly enough. In several countries 바카라사이트y have rolling evaluations by subject field - some of which might be relevant for your institution, o바카라사이트rs not - so universities aren't constantly pitted against one ano바카라사이트r.
So change 바카라사이트 influence of REF on 'perverse hiring practices' from occurring once every 6-7 years to it occurring every year?? Sounds like a sensible plan.... not!
The whole thing is a waste of time and money. Ditch 바카라사이트 ref and spend 바카라사이트 money on funding operations in 바카라사이트 NHS. Who care about ano바카라사이트r academic article.
If you are going to do REF, do yearly. Would any management be so "perverse" to be able to pull off 바카라사이트ir gaming tactics every year? Wouldnt it be too costly in terms of time and resources? but 바카라사이트n wannabes may be willing to do anything! Include staff and student suverys as part of this exercise. Assess 바카라사이트 universities on more diverse range of KPIs. Stop 바카라사이트m from using 바카라사이트 REF results for marketing purposes directly or indirectly. Stop ex-REF panel members from selling 바카라사이트ir services as consultants- we dont need a market for REF panel membership!
I can see academics being beaten up every. year by managers wanting to know what you have for 바카라사이트 ongoing REfF hardly conducive to doing quality research.
ADVERTISEMENT