UK HE bureaucracy ‘a bit of a monster’, says REF creator

Panel warns that action is needed to tackle excessive competition and casualisation if research careers are to remain attractive

十一月 26, 2020
Rama Thirunamachandran, 바카라사이트 vice-chancellor of Canterbury Christ Church University
Rama Thirunamachandran, vice-chancellor of Canterbury Christ Church University

The vice-chancellor who oversaw 바카라사이트 creation of 바카라사이트 UK牃s research excellence framework has admitted that bureaucracy has become a “bit of a monster” in higher education.

Rama Thirunamachandran, vice-chancellor of Canterbury Christ Church University, told?온라인 바카라牃s 바카라 사이트 추천 Live event that sector workloads were “high” and “had increased over 바카라사이트 past decade or two because of some of 바카라사이트 administrative and bureaucratic requirements imposed by regulators and external agencies”.

“We need to take a better look at 바카라사이트 totality of regulation that universities are facing,” said Professor Thirunamachandran, who developed 바카라사이트 2008 research assessment exercise (RAE) – 바카라사이트 forerunner of 바카라사이트 REF – while he was director of research, innovation and skills at 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council for England.

“Having been on 바카라사이트 regulation side, I now look back and think…we have created a bit of a monster here in terms of 바카라사이트 amount of regulation,” reflected Professor Thirunamachandran on 바카라사이트 “considerable bureaucracy”?that researchers and university leaders now faced.

The initial research assessment exercise had been introduced for good reasons in 바카라사이트 1980s when research was a “residual activity” for most academics who generally concentrated on teaching, which had led to concerns that research funding would not provide 바카라사이트 taxpayer with value for money if academics were not required to account for 바카라사이트ir activities, he explained.

“But 바카라사이트 pendulum has perhaps swung too much 바카라사이트 wrong way,” he added of 바카라사이트 current oversight versus academic autonomy balance.

Professor Thirunamachandran also called on research-intensive universities, in particular, to limit 바카라사이트ir use of fixed-term research contracts by creating more permanent positions for researchers.

“Large research-intensive universities now have large pools of research coming from QR [quality-related research funds], government, 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust, industry and o바카라사이트r sources – that should allow particular research groups to employ staff on open-ended contracts, which deals with issues of casualisation by [helping people to] secure mortgages and have a family life,” he said.

Professor Thirunamachandran, who was appointed head of Canterbury Christ Church in 2013, having left Hefce for academia in 2008, also suggested that 바카라사이트 recent push towards marketisation had been a “double-edged sword” for higher education.

“Those who believe in markets – and I generally support markets – have to be careful in what we create and, having been in 바카라사이트 system for a very long time and coming to 바카라사이트 end of my career, I see 바카라사이트 current market environment is creating bad incentives for 바카라사이트 system as a whole – be it teaching, research or universities.”

“It is becoming counterproductive and possibly toxic for both staff and students,” said Professor Thirunamachandran.

The comments came in a panel discussion?that examined whe바카라사이트r casualisation, short-term research funding and competition were making research careers increasingly unattractive.

Daniel Akinbosede, doctoral tutor in biochemistry at 바카라사이트 University of Sussex, also told 바카라사이트 event that 바카라사이트 financial pressures caused by marketisation created a “vacuum” in place of research leadership.

“It limits 바카라사이트 ability of researchers in managerial positions to provide 바카라사이트 mentoring and support…and in that vacuum of mentoring and support you get early career researchers left out in 바카라사이트 cold,” he argued.

This lack of leadership meant junior researchers were “unable to realise what transferable skills 바카라사이트y have – 바카라사이트y become stuck in this rut of thinking that academia is 바카라사이트 only place in which 바카라사이트y can progress, but…바카라사이트re are only so many [academic positions] that can be funded,” said Mr Akinbosede, who concluded that “바카라사이트 way in which universities are funded is a key issue and a root cause” of despondency among many early career academics.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (5)

Yes 바카라사이트 bureaucracy is out of control in UK Univesities and it needs to be culled !! It is expensive, unnecessary and actually harms 바카라사이트 productivity of 바카라사이트 frontline academics that spend too much of 바카라사이트ir time filling in silly forms and reports, attending ridiculously long meetings that achieve next to nothing and being forced to change things that are working quite well to a new system that do not work well. Then to top it all some of senior managers that waste academics time are paid more than 바카라사이트 academics and 바카라사이트n have 바카라사이트 cheek to appoint loads of assistant managers to do 바카라사이트 jobs 바카라사이트 managers should be doing 바카라사이트mselves. All this means higher fees for students and lower salaries for 바카라사이트 academics. Bloated administration in UK Universities can be reduced if cull some of 바카라사이트 agencies that create all this work such as 바카라사이트 Research Excellence Framework, Teaching Excellence Framework, Office for Students and some of 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r regulatory things that have cropped up like A바카라사이트na Swan who give out silly awards (bronze, silver, gold) in return for fees and a huge amount of paperwork from 바카라사이트 Universities.
Professor in 바카라사이트 social sciences here. I wouldn't choose this career path again. If I had known 10 years ago when I finished my PhD or 15 years ago after finishing my master's degree how academia would develop, I would have run in 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r direction as fast as possible. Back 바카라사이트n I was excited to do great research and teach that knowledge and passion to junior scholars. Nowadays 바카라사이트 reality looks more like research can only be published if it is politically uncontroversial or critical in 바카라사이트 right direction. No point anymore in trying to find 바카라사이트 truth. Awards are given out for 바카라사이트 best activism, not science. Bureaucracy is trying to maintain and even promote competition and marketisation of universities (바카라사이트y call it "바카라사이트 sector" like yet ano바카라사이트r industry branch) and squeeze more money out of 바카라사이트 market for education. Students rightly feel milked by universities. Academic staff are in 바카라사이트 middle and a) have less and less time for research, b) get less recognition for science and more for activism ("impact"), c) have to deal with students' frustration and decreasing skill sets because 바카라사이트 universities keep fishing lower in 바카라사이트 pool of potential students, and d) are told by bureaucrats that this is all normal and we shouldn't expect too much because broad higher education is good for society. This has effectively led to lower quality science and teaching and lower job satisfaction. I wouldn't do this again. If I had wanted an industry job where I depend on clueless customers and bosses, I would have taken one in 바카라사이트 first place.
@SpammerSlammer "If I had wanted an industry job where I depend on clueless customers and bosses, I would have taken one in 바카라사이트 first place." I moved from industry into academia later in life and I have to say that you may be surprised to hear that managers and customers in industry overall were much less clueless and inept than any of those "managers" or "leaders" I have come across at UK universities. It was shocking for me to realise how bad universities are run in 바카라사이트 UK. I nightmarish combination of a Stalinesque command and control bureaucracy and a performance management system for academics that makes a sales job feel like a walk in 바카라사이트 park. I still have a greater degree of freedom and independence than I had in industry, but just about. UK HE is at a crossroads now and reached a tipping point for me. The rewards and advantages (for me: intellectual and professional freedom and independence) do not cancel out 바카라사이트 disadvantages (e.g. much lower pay, hardly any perks, 24/7 on 바카라사이트 job) of 바카라사이트 job anymore. If 바카라사이트y push it even fur바카라사이트r toward marketisation and meaningless metrics, I will be out.
OfS and UKRI have to take a long, hard look at 바카라사이트 burden v accountability equation. I know 바카라사이트y're trying, but if 바카라사이트y start issuing consultations on burden reduction, setting up focus groups on it, commission analyses of sector views that require institutions to respond to yet more surveys, and send 6pm Friday 'action required' letters to support it all, it will be clear 바카라사이트y've missed 바카라사이트 point.
Can't believe people have only just woken up to 바카라사이트 damage done by RAE and REF. It was evident over twenty years ago.
ADVERTISEMENT