Source: Alamy
Half empty? Funding could rise by 50 per cent to match rivals such as 바카라사이트 US
The UK’s current level of research spending is “strikingly below” rivals such as 바카라사이트 US and Germany and could be increased by up to 50?per cent, according to a former government head of research funding.
Graeme Reid made 바카라사이트 comments in his recent inaugural lecture as professor of science and research policy at University College London, a job he took up in April after leaving 바카라사이트 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Professor Reid is widely seen as having played a major role in protecting 바카라사이트 science budget at a time when almost all government departments suffered deep cuts as a result of 바카라사이트 coalition government’s austerity programme.
The UK “has 바카라사이트 highest citations per pound [of investment] in 바카라사이트 G8”, Professor Reid said in 바카라사이트 lecture, entitled “Why Should 바카라사이트 Taxpayer Fund Science and Research?”
Professor Reid pointed to a highly skilled and scientifically informed labour force as “probably 바카라사이트 largest benefit of all” from public spending on science and research. Although he acknowledged that 53?per cent of PhDs would go on to careers outside science, he added that “some call it ‘leakage’ or ‘failure’, but I call it ‘impact’”.
He went on to consider 바카라사이트 role of research in improving public policy and public services, something he said is “sometimes underplayed compared to business”. A strong research base also helps to “attract R&D development from global business”, which looks for “talented people”, “high-quality science” and 바카라사이트 “ease of working with universities” when deciding where to locate research facilities.
There is good evidence of public support for “blue-skies” as well as applied research, said Professor Reid, citing an Ipsos Mori poll indicating that 35?per cent of 바카라사이트 public strongly agreed (and 43?per cent more tended to agree) that “even if it brings no immediate benefits, scientific research which advances knowledge should be funded by 바카라사이트 government”.
Only 3?per cent, in contrast, strongly agreed that “government funding for science should be cut because 바카라사이트 money can be better spent elsewhere”.
Professor Reid observed that although public money given to science and research now amounts to “?3 a week for each person in 바카라사이트 UK”, international comparisons suggest that this is “basically an unremarkable level of expenditure” and “strikingly below some of 바카라사이트 countries we like to emulate”.
He concluded his talk by asking whe바카라사이트r it was “time to reappraise 바카라사이트 level of scientific funding in 바카라사이트 UK”, perhaps boosting it by one-third or even half to match our American and German competitors.
When asked by a member of 바카라사이트 audience about 바카라사이트 potential impact of any significant future cuts in science funding, Professor Reid responded that “we would need to think if we could continue to be excellent in everything – because we can’t afford to be average in everything”.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
