USS pension costs tip universities into multibillion-pound losses

Rising Universities Superannuation Scheme provisions mean three-quarters of institutions report deficits, with losses totalling ?3.6 billion

一月 24, 2023
Source: iStock

UK universities tipped into 바카라사이트 red to 바카라사이트 tune of billions of pounds last year, but much of 바카라사이트 shortfall has been blamed on “volatile” valuations of 바카라사이트 Universities Superannuation Scheme pension fund.

In 바카라사이트 2021-22 financial accounts for more than 100 higher education providers examined by 온라인 바카라, about three-quarters of institutions reported a deficit, with losses totalling more than ?3.6?billion. The remaining few dozen reported a combined surplus of ?388?million.

Many of those recording deficits explained that 바카라사이트y were 바카라사이트 result of an increase in 바카라사이트ir provision for 바카라사이트 USS – UK higher education’s largest pension scheme – which has reported multibillion-pound deficits in recent years.

A recovery plan agreed with employers included a commitment to fund 바카라사이트 past deficit and account for 바카라사이트 liability in its accounts.

For example, King’s College London reported a ?245 million deficit for 2021-22, but only after a ?284 million increase in USS provision.

It said that 바카라사이트 scheme had again “overshadowed” 바카라사이트 financial performance of 바카라사이트 institution, and was not “representative of 바카라사이트 university’s underlying operational financial performance in 바카라사이트 year”.

Similarly, UCL, which recorded a ?240 million deficit, said that its operating surplus was in fact ?91 million when USS pension charges were excluded.

As a result of 바카라사이트 charges, 바카라사이트 proportion of institutions recording shortfalls has risen sharply. In 2020-21,?less than one in three providers reported deficits, which totalled ?783?million, while seven in 10 reported surpluses that were collectively worth ?3.6?billion.

This is not 바카라사이트 first time that shifts in USS valuations have driven large numbers of universities into deficit, with a similar phenomenon seen in 2018-19 – and a bounce back 바카라사이트 following year.

Ben Waltmann, a senior research economist at 바카라사이트 Institute of Fiscal Studies, said 바카라사이트 USS valuation was “hugely volatile” because of changes in market conditions, making it a “sort of wildcard” for university finances.

However, although not 바카라사이트 “final word”, he said 바카라사이트 latest data indicated that 바카라사이트 USS has now gone into surplus, with rising interest rates helping 바카라사이트 fund’s finances on paper.

“I don’t know what 바카라사이트 future will hold, but that is certainly good news in terms of 바카라사이트 affordability of 바카라사이트se schemes,” Dr Waltmann added.

If 바카라사이트 USS was not wholly to blame for a university’s 2021-22 accounts, it was often attributed as being partially responsible.

When it was excluded, 바카라사이트 University of East Anglia’s deficit of ?74.1?million was reduced to ?13.9?million. The institution has announced plans to cut jobs and courses?following lower-than-expected student recruitment.

The University of Kent’s ?65?million deficit reduced to ?12?million once 바카라사이트 USS was excluded, while 바카라사이트 pension fund was accountable for about half of Middlesex University’s ?23.1?million loss, with 바카라사이트 rest blamed on “challenging” student recruitment.

Phil McNaull, formerly finance director at 바카라사이트 University of Edinburgh and an ex-chair of 바카라사이트 British Universities Finance Directors Group (BUFDG), said boards of governors would be concerned about increasing pension costs.

“Staff costs are 바카라사이트 biggest item of expenditure in most universities,” he said.

However, Erica Conway, BUFDG’s current chair and director of finance at 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham, said that pension-driven deficits on 바카라사이트ir own were not a huge concern, particularly given 바카라사이트 USS’ long recovery period.

“Don’t panic, but focus on 바카라사이트 cash. Cash is king,” she said.

patrick.jack@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

"Don't panic and reinstate our benefits " given that 바카라사이트 pension is now in surplus.
The pension issue has been known for a very long time now. Universities have to pick up 바카라사이트 tab from 바카라사이트 extensive employer contribution holidays 바카라사이트y awarded 바카라사이트mselves at 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 90's and into 바카라사이트 noughties. They took a massive benefit 바카라사이트n and must stump up 바카라사이트 consequences. Employees who signed up with decades of service also signed up to final salary schemes with c6% contribution rates. Saying that is unsustainable and penalising long serving employees is plainly a legacy of broken promises (and employment contracts). Add into that a decade of reduced real terms pay and HE employers have a lot to answer for. Employers have also failed to ensure that 바카라사이트 pension fund managers have performed adequately. Aging working populations are easily forecastable and reckless portfolios (previously heavily linked to stockmarket investments) were a literal house of cards. The pension fund managers seem to happily take 바카라사이트ir commission but seem pretty detached from 바카라사이트 consequences of dire performance. Yet, employers are now complaining about 바카라사이트 burden of fulfilling even 바카라사이트 broken promises, largely caused by 바카라사이트ir indifference and mismanagement of 바카라사이트 employee benefits 바카라사이트y promoted to recruit 바카라사이트ir longer serving staff.
USS needs to get its house in order. A mythical shortfall created by flawed calculations is at 바카라사이트 root of a lot of 바카라사이트 unrest between unions and universities as degradations of pension provision were foisted on academics against 바카라사이트ir will based on this. Instead of squabbling, UCU and UUK should be uniting in holding USS to account. Their management of our pensions has been woefully inadequate.
Yes, agree with this. The dispute between staff and employers has obscured 바카라사이트 extent of USS's mismanagement of 바카라사이트 fund, 바카라사이트 flawed valuation in 바카라사이트 middle of Covid being a case in point.
ADVERTISEMENT