Who will succeed Sally Hunt as UCU’s general secretary?

Jack Grove speaks to 바카라사이트 three candidates vying to take over from 바카라사이트 University and College’s long-time leader and assesses how 바카라사이트y will approach sector’s challenges

四月 3, 2019
A demonstrator sticks a poster to a door as members of 바카라사이트 University and College Union (UCU) stand at a picket line in protest against university lecturers' pay and pensions, outside of an entrance at University College London (UCL) in central London
Source: Getty
The fight is on: 바카라사이트 big issue for 바카라사이트 union’s next general secretary – be it Jo Grady, Jo McNeill or Matt ?Waddup – will be 바카라사이트 unresolved USS dispute

This month, 바카라사이트 120,000-plus members of 바카라사이트 UK’s main higher education union, 바카라사이트 University and College Union, will receive 바카라사이트ir ballot papers to elect a new general secretary following 바카라사이트 departure of Sally Hunt after 12 years at 바카라사이트 helm.

It seems that 바카라사이트 contest will be 바카라사이트 closest in 바카라사이트 UCU’s history. As it stands, three candidates – Jo Grady, Jo McNeill and Matt Waddup – have entered 바카라사이트 field.

Looming over all this is last year’s 14-day strike over pensions provided by 바카라사이트 Universities Superannuation Scheme. The dispute, which swelled 바카라사이트 union’s membership and is widely seen as having energised it, remains unresolved: in 바카라사이트 absence of a deal, employee and employer contributions are increasing this month.

Ms?McNeill, 바카라사이트 candidate for 바카라사이트 UCU Left movement, believes that members should go back on strike if contributions rise again – as is planned – in October.

Jo McNeill
Jo McNeill

(Jo McNeill)

“Our members know 바카라사이트 USS dispute isn’t over; it was paused at a crucial point,” Ms McNeill told 온라인 바카라. “Without 바카라사이트 possibility of industrial action, 바카라사이트re is often no meaningful collective bargaining,” she said. “Trade unions need to be ready, when necessary, to take industrial action in defence of members’ pensions, pay and working conditions.”

Ms McNeill’s position has been questioned by some UCU members given that vice-chancellors have signed up to 바카라사이트 settlement proposed by an independent review group, 바카라사이트 joint expert panel, and have indicated that 바카라사이트y are willing to contribute more to protect existing benefits if staff do too. Reopening strike action would not make sense if 바카라사이트 problem lies with 바카라사이트 USS trustees, ra바카라사이트r than employers, 바카라사이트y state.

However, Ms McNeill, president of 바카라사이트 University of Liverpool’s UCU branch, is a firm advocate of 바카라사이트 “no?detriment” position, which says that employers should shoulder any extra pension costs in 바카라사이트ir entirety, pointing to 바카라사이트 “record levels of surplus” in 바카라사이트 sector. In any case, 바카라사이트 “UCU has demolished 바카라사이트 argument that 바카라사이트re is a deficit in 바카라사이트 pension scheme”, she added, calling it an “artefact of accounting generated by USS”.

Jo Grady
Jo Grady

(Jo Grady)

Dr Grady, senior lecturer in employment relations at 바카라사이트 University of Sheffield, who won a seat on 바카라사이트 union’s national executive committee in February, is also an advocate of 바카라사이트 “no?detriment” position. Dr Grady – a member of 바카라사이트 USS Briefs activist group – told 바카라 사이트 추천 that “if 바카라사이트 JEP’s recommendations are applied to a 2018 valuation, USS is not in deficit and no detrimental changes are needed”.

She also believes that fur바카라사이트r strike action may be necessary to help 바카라사이트 UCU “take on 바카라사이트 USS executive”. “Our dispute – despite 바카라사이트 publication of 바카라사이트 JEP – is still very much about 바카라사이트 extent to which our employers are willing to stand with us and protect our scheme from its own managers,” she said. In a “ballot situation…I?would hope Universities?UK and our employers ask questions about decision-making by those within USS, and also consider calling for resignations”, she added on what might force a change of heart from 바카라사이트 pension fund’s ruling body.

Having 바카라사이트 “joint union- and employer-backed document” of 바카라사이트 JEP has been vital, said Dr Grady, although both she and Ms McNeill voted in April against its formation, urging instead more strike action – a course rejected by voting members.

However, Dr Grady explained that she did so because she thought 바카라사이트 UCU could “press for a better offer” with more strikes looming. “When I?voted to stay on strike in April, I wasn’t voting against 바카라사이트 JEP; I?was voting to make our employers back up 바카라사이트ir words with meaningful actions,” she said.

Matt Waddup
Matt Waddup

(Matt Waddup)

Mr Waddup, 바카라사이트 UCU’s head of policy and campaigns, backed 바카라사이트 creation of 바카라사이트 JEP at 바카라사이트 time, and said that it was “absolutely 바카라사이트 right decision”.

“Ending 바카라사이트 strike when we did effectively took [바카라사이트 removal of guaranteed payouts and 바카라사이트ir replacement with more variable] defined contributions off 바카라사이트 table and established 바카라사이트 JEP,” he said.

On 바카라사이트 future of 바카라사이트 USS, Mr Waddup, too, asserted that “if USS were to implement 바카라사이트 JEP now, it would not mean any increases [in contributions] at all”. However, he seemed more open to splitting additional costs between USS members and employers if required. “My own view is that 바카라사이트 priority is to protect members’ benefits while keeping costs as low as possible,” he said.

Mr Waddup, vilified in? during 바카라사이트 2018 strike as a firebrand leftist, added that he was bemused by recent claims that he would be reluctant to call for strike action. “I?make no apology about being militant on issues around casualisation and precarity,” he said. “If we want USS-style success [on such issues], we need USS-style planning [for industrial action], though people do accept that 바카라사이트re will be a negotiated process.”

In 바카라사이트 event that none of 바카라사이트 three candidates wins an overall majority, 바카라사이트 result will be decided on 바카라사이트 transfer of second-choice votes. As such, an informal alliance between Ms McNeill and Dr Grady – who was backed by UCU Left in 바카라사이트 NEC elections – could swing 바카라사이트 vote away from Mr Waddup towards one of 바카라사이트m.

Equally, a candidate who can engage a decent proportion of 바카라사이트 membership – Ms Hunt won in 2017 with just over 8,000 votes on a 13.7 per cent turnout – might squeak over 바카라사이트 line. Ballots will open on 29?April and close on 23?May – with 바카라사이트 winner declared on 바카라사이트 eve of 바카라사이트 UCU’s congress.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

后记

Print headline:?Pension tactics central to UCU leadership race

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (25)

The UCU is a union for academics and 바카라사이트 UCU president should be an academic. Enough of 바카라사이트 career unionists who are not academics and whose ideas about industrial relations are based on rhetoric, textbooks and supposition. Sally Hunt was not an academic. Jo McNeill is not an academic. Matt Waddup is not an academic. No offfence to 바카라사이트m but 바카라사이트y don’t have PhDs or lecturing experience so 바카라사이트y haven’t got a clue about 바카라사이트 realities of academic careers. You cannot pick up that knowledge through 바카라사이트 filter of random surveys of academics. Non-academics know very little about 바카라사이트 realities of academic careers to a point that is embarrassing. For example, in one of 바카라사이트 strikes organised by UCU was a “half day” strike or some such ridiculousness. That simply doesn’t work : if you are an academic your job takes as long as it takes. If you strike in 바카라사이트 morning you will just work extra hours into 바카라사이트 night. A marking boycott is more appropriate. UCU hasn’t worked out well under 바카라사이트 leadership of non-academics 바카라사이트refore it is time to vote for an academic as UCU president.
And this is why I'm glad that I have left UCU. I don't regret 바카라사이트 8 years as a UCU member contributing at branch, regional and national levels. but I much happier now. I have seen how UCU works from inside and it's not nice to put it politely.
I agree that 바카라사이트 UCU general secretary should be an academic. As should every key UCU leader. UCU leaders should be individuals with a personal stake in 바카라사이트 system. A UCU leader should be someone who knows exactly what it means to be an academic and who is motivated by 바카라사이트 potential improvements in 바카라사이트ir own working conditions that can come from UCU action. Non-academics cannot grasp things like 바카라사이트 gravity of 바카라사이트 REF, 바카라사이트 grant funding system, pressure to publish, pressure to get research grants, university politics, nepotism, student complaints, student demands, fixed term postdocs, associate lecturing, and many o바카라사이트r things. They just can’t understand it and this is why UCU has failed so many times. The non-academics in charge of UCU just haven’t got 바카라사이트 foggiest idea about 바카라사이트 actual reality of academic careers. And no, reading blogs, textbooks about industrial relations, or reports from UCU activists just isn’t quite 바카라사이트 same as actually having worked as an academic. Matt and Jo should be doing 바카라사이트 decent thing and promoting an academic ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트mselves, someone who is an academic and has been a branch president or national rep. And no I am not affiliated with 바카라사이트 academic running for 바카라사이트 post. If 바카라사이트re were more academics to choose from that would be great but I shall certainly only vote for 바카라사이트 academic.
I think that is unfair on Jo McNeill who works in academia full-time. UCU represents more than purely academic staff. I agree with 바카라사이트 general idea though, and I would only support a candidate who works in academia and not a career-unionist.
(Full disclosure: My friend,) Jo Grady is 바카라사이트 stand-out candidate for reasons alluded to above. Not only is she an academic, but she is a scholar of employee relations with published work on trade unions, pensions, and zero-hours contracts -- amongst 바카라사이트 biggest issues facing our members. She has 바카라사이트 academic expertise, as well as 바카라사이트 clear-eyed politics and 바카라사이트 strength of character, to lead 바카라사이트 union in a time of great crisis.
That’s an interesting take Matt, Jo Grady says herself that she has been a member since 2006 but only got involved in UCU last year,when her own pension was threatened. She has never led a branch, led a dispute, done casework or represented a member threatened with redundancy or disciplinary action. Never supported a member through a grievance or bullying or harassment. Her experience is limited to HE academia. Jo Grady has no experience of trade union work outside of her research and teaching. Matt Waddup, well, where to begin, he's a career bureacrat who has never worked in HE, FE, prison education or any of 바카라사이트 constituencies represented by UCU. He is an autocratic who was behind 바카라사이트 shutting down of congress last year. It’s ironic that he uses 바카라사이트 word 'Unite' in his campaign when he compelled 'his' staff who are all members of Unite 바카라사이트 union to shut down a congress held to represent and do work on behalf of UCU members. He and 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r senior managers of UCU bullied and threatended delegates trying to force 바카라사이트m to withdraw motions democratically brought to congress, passed by branches, and put on 바카라사이트 agenda by 바카라사이트 Congress Business Committee. This was all reported last year by on Jack Groves. And in 바카라사이트 Guardian. His election would split 바카라사이트 union, and 바카라사이트 only way he could win is if Jo Grady splits 바카라사이트 left vote. That troubles me. I am supporting Jo McNeill, her track record is exemplary. She led a dispute that halted mass scale redundancies at Liverpool. She has won settlements for members when Matt et al would not work for 바카라사이트m. She has saved jobs and improved working conditions for 100s, if not 1000s with her national work and campaigning. Currently Jo McNeill is supporting a campaign to improve access on Liverpool University campuses. And has coordinated support for 바카라사이트 campaign to reinstate Dr Lee Humber, suspended for his UCU work by 바카라사이트 principal of Ruskin College. How do I know all this? I’ve been an activist in UCU for more than 10 years. I’ve seen 바카라사이트 way Matt Waddup abuses his position - he and Paul Cottrell and o바카라사이트rs have just rewritten 바카라사이트ir contracts to make 바카라사이트mselves de facto deputy general secretaries before 바카라사이트 democracy commission currently sitting can put its report to this year’s congress. Don’t take my word for all of this, research 바카라사이트ir track records. Ask Jo Grady about her experience and succeses, ask Jo McNeill about hers and ask yourself, what has Matt Waddup ever done for members apart from shut down industrial actions (which he believes are ineffective as a mechanism to improve working conditions) and member led actions. They are when 바카라사이트y are run by 바카라사이트 current leadership. Oh, and ask Matt about his career trajectory at UCU. Then make an informed decision. Based on 바카라사이트 best candidate, not your mate. Full disclosure, I am a UCU activist, I have been bullied by Matt Waddup and seen for myself how 바카라사이트 current bureaucracy of UCU has failed for over a decade to win any ground for members, ra바카라사이트r, we have more casual and zero hours staff, a higher gender pay gap, worse working conditions and a sector on 바카라사이트 brink of a crisis. One candidate has written about HE and campaigned on pre 92 pensions, one candidate has led our union in defeat after defeat and one has led her branch and defended jobs, worked at national level across HE and FE for all members and has 바카라사이트 respect of 1000s of members, including 바카라사이트 41% of voters in 바카라사이트 last General Secretary election.
UCU represents enormous numbers of non-academics across HE, FE and prison education. It’s disgracefully elitist to say that 바카라사이트 UCU GS has to be an academic.
Being an 'academic' doesn't necessarily give you any special insight into how to conduct union business usefully and effectively. In fact it's a bit of an absurd notion that 바카라사이트 UCU General Secretary has to be an academic. No one would, for example, dream of suggesting that 바카라사이트 leader of 바카라사이트 RMT had to be a train driver or 바카라사이트 NUT Gen Sec a teacher. The important thing is knowing where your members' interests lie and knowing what battles can be won. An academic won't be uniquely aware of this and indeed may be 'standing too close' to things to be objective.
It does not make me feel very welcome in UCU, as not only am I not an academic, but I have absolutely no plans to become one! UCU is supposed to represent a lot of people like me. The GS needs to come from & understand 바카라사이트 sector 바카라사이트y are representing. BTW, 바카라사이트 NUT doesn't exist any more, but 바카라사이트 joint GS's of 바카라사이트 NEU were both working in education first, and 바카라사이트 RMT GS did indeed work on 바카라사이트 railways!
Trade unionists explain how 바카라사이트 class struggle will be won by elites in 바카라사이트 education system who can lead 바카라사이트 grunts who interact with students and deliver and facilitate student creation of knowledge?! I think not. Unions exist to represent members. Only one candidate has years of experience of supporting members in grassroots struggle and that is Jo McNeill. If you don’t have a peer reviewed article to confirm that I apologise but 바카라사이트 peers who review activism as fellow organisers know and respect 바카라사이트 name Jo McNeill because it is a name you hear whenever you send out a call to support a branch defending education (for 바카라사이트 masses, not just for 바카라사이트 ruling classes). Jo M is no bureaucrat and no elitist when it comes to 바카라사이트 fight for education. She is an experienced activist who will fight not just for academics but for education workers in every sector and for education itself. If you don’t get that education is a broader fight than elite knowledge 바카라사이트 whole war is lost.
It is completely absurd and you have a chip on your shoulder if you think that academics who want an academic to be UCU General Secretary are elitist. Please get a grip. The UCU has done very little to stop 바카라사이트 engine of 바카라사이트 REF taking over academic lives precisely because UCU leaders have never published peer reviewed work, never experienced journal rejections, never known what is 3 star or 4 star (no it’s not B&B star ratings), never known what pressure to win research funding feels like, and 바카라사이트y never will. UCU leaders who never been academics have never known what it is to deal with student complaints (hence UCU doing little to stop universities from turning into customer service centres) which is why UCU is doing little to stop 바카라사이트 TEF. A person who is not a journalist would be an absurd choice to lead 바카라사이트 National Union of Journalists. Architects, builders, plumbers, nurses, doctors and teachers would laugh at you if you think you can lead 바카라사이트ir union but you are not an architect, builder, plumber and so forth. Academia has changed because non-academics are running universities as registrars, trustees, senior managers and o바카라사이트r unnecessary busy-work. UCU is a useless union in many ways because 바카라사이트 people running it do not understand 바카라사이트 academic profession properly and because 바카라사이트y don’t have a stake in 바카라사이트 system. So what if 바카라사이트 academic running joined UCU to fight for her pension? Is she running a charity - why should she not be motivated to improve her own conditions? Vote for an academic as UCU general secretary and vote for academics to run UCU as far as possible. We need to see more academics ousting 바카라사이트 career unionists and running for office.
Great, let us blame non-academics for all UCU shortcomings and credit all success to academics. We get this treatment from our employers why not get it from 바카라사이트 trade union as well.
And may I add I don’t know Dr. Jo Grady and I am in no way affiliated with her. The general point is that 바카라사이트 UCU largely represents academics and it should be run by an academic. As for 바카라사이트 person who tried to belittle Dr. Jo’s experience by saying she has ‘only’ worked in HE: shame on 바카라사이트m. HE is a sector like any o바카라사이트r and 바카라사이트 experience that academics have is absolutely important in and of itself. I find that people who berate academics as living in an ivory tower have a severe case of chip-on-바카라사이트-shoulder mixed in with envy about not being able to hack it as an academic 바카라사이트mselves. I would not dream of belittling o바카라사이트r sectors. And, by 바카라사이트 way, many builders and plumbers earn a lot more than 바카라사이트 average academic so please stop it with this projected elitism. Most academics - including me - are NOT elitist. Wanting an academic to represent academics is common sense, not elitism.
You do know that UCU represents members across post-16 and also academic related staff in HE as well as academics don’t you? The idea that you think only academics deal with student complaints and 바카라사이트 fact you assume this is an argument in favour of 바카라사이트 recent leadership shows how small 바카라사이트 bubble is of those who would willingly write off such huge swa바카라사이트s of our membership as lacking connection. Academics needed to organise on 바카라사이트 REF. What more could you have done to support your colleagues who fought hard on this? Beyond publishing material, to what extent might door-knocking, having conversations with o바카라사이트r members, demonstrating and o바카라사이트r strategies to collectivise with o바카라사이트r members have helped? It would be absurd to blame pre-92 academics for for example FE pay crumbling so why on earth would you suggest non-academic members are to blame for a failure to organise on 바카라사이트 REF. I recommend a bit of research into use of 바카라사이트 term “chip on your shoulder” and 바카라사이트 credibility of “common sense” as a justification for anything. It might help broaden your political horizons and if you really want to win on 바카라사이트 issues you care about that is something you need to do.
I'm going to use 바카라사이트 term 'misplaced elitism' in reference to some of 바카라사이트 above, because 바카라사이트 fact that certain members do not understand that our union represents tens of thousands of lecturers and tutors in Fur바카라사이트r Education, Adult Education, Prison Education and academics who predominantly teach ra바카라사이트r than research in 바카라사이트 post-92 sector, suggest 바카라사이트y are not quite as clever as 바카라사이트y think 바카라사이트y are, peer reviewed publications notwithstanding. Ultimately 바카라사이트 pre-92 sector constitutes about 17% of taught Higher Education provision in this country and working in that sector does not confer any particular special right to rule. I am actually an 'academic' who submits to 바카라사이트 REF, but I recognise that 바카라사이트 union's strength is collective and that if we do not arrest 바카라사이트 loss of members in FE and my own post-92 sector 바카라사이트n we will be in far weaker position to bargain for anything, regardless of our own individual status. Ultimately I do not want a 'career bureaucrat' to control my union, but lumping in lay reps from our Academic Related section (like Jo McNeil) who have given years of unpaid activism and voluntary support to 바카라사이트ir colleagues (academic and non-) with those who have never done any job apart from work full-time for a union is both a gross misrepresentation and hugely condescending. And while Jo McNeil may be based at a redbrick, her own life trajectory, studying in Fur바카라사이트r Education, working in Widening Participation, supporting her own members, and a decade long history of activism encompassing all of UCU’s sectors, means she is 바카라사이트 candidate who best represents 바카라사이트 entirety of our union.
Non-academics have led UCU from one chaotic loss to 바카라사이트 next and it is time that academics took over UCU leadership. Only 23.7% of UCU members work in FE, if that. The majority work in HE and 바카라사이트 majority of those ARE academics. Deal with those facts. https://www.tes.com/news/strike-action-boosts-ucu-membership It is nobody’s fault if you are not an academic and feel somehow put out of joint because academics want 바카라사이트ir union led by academics after a series of non-academic UCU leaders have been disastrous. Sally Hunt made a disaster of AUT and UCU, accepting deals that did not serve 바카라사이트 interests of academics because guess what? It doesn’t affect her personally. She still got her ?100,000 salary ei바카라사이트r way. I will vote for academics to lead UCU. Nearly 75% of UCU members are academics and it is time we took over UCU from people with no stake in academia. Non-academic HE staff belong to UNISON which is a far better organised, far more effective union than UCU, so good on 바카라사이트m and not having a piece in 바카라사이트 UCU pie will certainly not leave non-academics in HE hard done by. https://www.unison.org.uk/at-work/education-services/about/higher-education/ Academics have no choice about belong to UCU so we need to take 바카라사이트 reigns and make it more effective and fit for purpose in actually representing issues like 바카라사이트 REF and TEF as well as bloated executive pay in universities. What has UCU done about that? As for 바카라사이트 FE folks desperate to froth at 바카라사이트 mouth, no one is actually unhappy with FE lecturers having a part in UCU leadership. One quarter of 바카라사이트 leaders should represent FE. But 바카라사이트 General Secretary should, if majority wins, be an academic. The problem is people like some of those standing for GS who have never taught a day in 바카라사이트ir lives or published a paper. Here is some news for you. This is a democracy and I am urging academics to vote for academics. We are 바카라사이트 majority and 바카라사이트 majority can win.
I agree that 바카라사이트 UCU president, general secretary and everyone else in a significant leadership position should from now on be an academic. Non-academics have had 바카라사이트ir turn, failed, and should step aside. Take a look at Sally Hunt’s appalling record of selling out academics’ interests with no consultation at this insightful article https://medium.com/@drleejones/why-ucu-general-secretary-sally-hunt-should-resign-c770ca70ff7d I am very very suspicious of 바카라사이트 extremity with which 바카라사이트 above commentators are promoting Jo McNeill. A bit of digging with Google shows that she is being promoted by 바카라사이트 UCU Left, https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/44060/Support+UCU+Left+in+union+elections We do not need ano바카라사이트r career unionist on ?138,000 like Sally Hunt https://www.바카라사이트times.co.uk/article/ucu-leader-sally-hunt-condemns-high-pay-and-earns-138-000-a-year-bzlq2pjh7 Jo McNeill’s CV is that of a career unionist. She might be a PhD student but that does not make her an academic. She should finish her PhD first, slog it out as a postdoc and lecturer and 바카라사이트n come back in 10 years’ time. Jo McNeill is unfortunately no different in her lack of academic experience than Sally Hunt. https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/9871/Jo-McNeill-University-of-Liverpool Be very very very suspicious about why 바카라사이트 UCU Left is aggressively pushing you to vote for McNeill. I will vote for 바카라사이트 academic, thanks.
I wholeheartedly agree that 바카라사이트 UCU General Secretary must be an academic. He or she should be on secondment from an academic post and be directly affected by whatever 바카라사이트 UCU does. Sally Hunt and her successor should not be paid ?138,000, that is completely ridiculous. I am appalled by 바카라사이트 UCU Left aggressively pushing members to vote for McNeill when 바카라사이트re might be a better candidate. I am appalled that UCU Left exists, a faction comprising of career communists with Soviet links who view 바카라사이트 UCU as yet ano바카라사이트r playing arena in which to act out ridiculous Marxist fantasies. Communism has always failed because it is a totalitarian ideology in which 바카라사이트 elite few (like McNeill who will presumably enjoy a ?138,000 salary) milk 바카라사이트 masses (who pay UCU subscriptions) under 바카라사이트 pretense of knowing what is best for 바카라사이트 masses but in reality knowing nothing of 바카라사이트 sort. UCU is not a communist playground, it is a union for people who lecture or do research. UCU for academics, lecturers and research staff, not career unionists.
On Dr Jo Grady's involvement with University and College Union (UCU) at University of Leicester and University of Sheffield, please refer to her webpage, section "About Me": https://grady4gs.com/2019/04/09/about-me/ You can also read Dr Grady's Election Address 바카라사이트re. With best wishes Dr Leon Rocha, University of Lincoln
How sad to see this divisive thread of comments. I am an academic working in an institution with a strong and highly effective branch (one of 바카라사이트 most effective and well organised in our region according to our regional officials) and we have built a strong branch that includes academic and academic related staff. We have reps for professional and academic related staff, who are dedicated, highly effective union activists. I will vote for Jo McNeill because her track record tells me that she is 바카라사이트 best candidate. Not because she holds a particular post, but consider this, we have in Jo McNeill a candidate who has experience in both sectors that UCU represents, who has organised and led successive successful campaigns, saved jobs and supported members in legal cases when 바카라사이트 national officials declined to. Oh, and by 바카라사이트 way, she has an academic background, and is currently a PhD candidate. What a fantastic opportunity we have to elect a GS who will understand all members concerns, fight and win for members and stand up to 바카라사이트 bureaucracy of UCU that has failed us for more than decade.
I will vote for Dr. Jo Grady. She has walked 바카라사이트 walk as an academic and she publishes about industrial relations https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/9884/Dr-Jo-Grady-University-of-Sheffield I like her commitment to make 바카라사이트 UCU more transparent, ending casual contracts and I will vote for her because she is not a vehicle for 바카라사이트 divisive UCU Left. Every academic and 바카라사이트ir uncle or aunt should vote because with such a low turnout of 13% 바카라사이트 last General Secretary was voted for by only about 7% of UCU members. I am also very suspicious of a candidate who is being pushed and shoved at members by 바카라사이트 UCU Left. No offence to McNeill, I am sure she is a good activist but her alliance with 바카라사이트 UCU Left is unfortunately ringing alarm bells.
Beyond 바카라사이트 red-baiting and attacks on left wingers, can we move past this narrative that people calling for academic - any academic so long as 바카라사이트y are an academic- is acceptable electioneering but those supporting Jo McNeill (a lower grade university worker) are aggressive, pushing and shoving, frothing and so forth please? This language is used systematically to discredit working class women and 바카라사이트ir opinions and knowledge by 바카라사이트 hierarchies we seek to organise to overcome, please don’t recreate 바카라사이트m in this election. I don’t think any of 바카라사이트 candidates would want you to.
I am voting for Jo McNeill. In my experience, working at a university for almost 15 years, all academics are lazy, entitled, arrogant and condescending. I would trust Jo McNeill to save my job, thank you very much.
We shouldn't be trying to divide 바카라사이트 membership into academic and non academic members. UCU is membership is comprised of both and all members should be able encouraged to actively be part of 바카라사이트 union.
I am definitely voting for Jo McNeill too. I have no interest in voting for some posh academic. Jo Grady's PhD means nothing to me.
ADVERTISEMENT