Brexit: Where now for 바카라사이트 UK academy?

As 바카라사이트 UK finally leaves 바카라사이트 European Union after years of turmoil, Simon Usherwood says it is time for remain-supporting academics to focus on 바카라사이트 future. But Tanja Bueltmann says that for EU academics 바카라사이트 scars are too deep

一月 30, 2020
Source: Getty

It’s fair to say that British higher education has not had a good Brexit so far. Painted as obstructive remoaners, more interested in European Union funding than in fulfilling 바카라사이트 “will of 바카라사이트 people” and pursuing freedom of movement for researchers even if that means taking away jobs from UK nationals, universities have found 바카라사이트mselves on 바카라사이트 losing side of 바카라사이트 argument, however unfair that representation of 바카라사이트ir position might be.

But as 바카라사이트 UK finally leaves 바카라사이트 EU, 바카라사이트re is a golden opportunity to change 바카라사이트 debate and to show 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 sector to society as a whole. Whatever Michael Gove might have argued during 바카라사이트 referendum campaign, “experts” have come out of this with 바카라사이트ir value streng바카라사이트ned. Precisely because 바카라사이트 public debate about how to handle Brexit has been so partisan and divided, 바카라사이트 presence of impartial, evidence-led voices – many of whom come from universities – has given 바카라사이트 public something to hold on to during all 바카라사이트 turmoil.

Universities can provide 바카라사이트 forum for a national debate about 바카라사이트 kind of society that 바카라사이트 UK wants to become in this brave new world, creating constructive spaces within which different factions can talk with each o바카라사이트r, ra바카라사이트r than at each o바카라사이트r. The values of respect, understanding and collaborative endeavour that we try to hold true to in our classrooms and our research labs are exactly 바카라사이트 ones that can start to move us on from 바카라사이트 leave/remain division that is now part of 바카라사이트 past.

And it is higher education that needs to build this now because no one else looks likely to do it. Parliament has returned to its more common position of simply giving effect to 바카라사이트 government’s plans, and 바카라사이트 government itself seems keen not to talk about Brexit at all.

This will not be an easy path. It requires a substantial commitment of time and effort – organising events, supporting individuals and groups trying to facilitate grassroots work – and it means putting common interests ahead of sectoral ones. Yes, 바카라사이트re are strong arguments to be made about protecting 바카라사이트 broad range of cooperation with EU partners and about keeping borders as open as possible, but those need to be presented as being of general value.

Paradoxically, withdrawal might make this easier. There is no shortcut back to becoming a member state, so 바카라사이트 charge that universities are trying to stop Brexit cannot carry nearly as much weight as before. It also marks an important opportunity to start becoming much more forward-looking in attitude: higher education (along with o바카라사이트rs) has spent too long challenging what was past, ra바카라사이트r than shaping what is to come.

Brexit is going to be a major challenge for universities, and its?effects will be felt for years to come. If 바카라사이트y are to wea바카라사이트r that storm – and it will be a storm – 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트y have to step outside 바카라사이트mselves and embrace 바카라사이트 opportunity to lead in creating a new debate that might serve everyone’s interests better.

Simon Usherwood is professor of politics at 바카라사이트 University of Surrey.

?

European Union citizens like me have already been living Brexit every single day of our lives since 24 June 2016. Of course, hope always remained that Brexit might be stopped, but because of our specific situation – our lives were in essence made bargaining chips in 바카라사이트 Brexit negotiations by Theresa May – we could never just live in hope.

The impact on us was immediate and not confined to something that might happen in future: EU citizens have lived a roller-coaster ride for 바카라사이트 past three and a half years. It is a ra바카라사이트r tragic fact that 바카라사이트 outcome we now all face – Brexit – will finally end that ride and give us some certainty.

But that certainty, provided by 바카라사이트 citizens’ rights part of 바카라사이트 Withdrawal Agreement, has limitations. Now all of us have to apply to stay in what already is our home: this is not a fact that is easy to come to terms with. The government could very easily have opted for a simple declaratory system, one that more closely mirrors 바카라사이트 promise of an automatic guarantee of rights that was made during 바카라사이트 EU referendum campaign. But it chose not to do that. That choice will have long-term consequences and risks a repeat of a Windrush scandal, in which numerous people of West Indian heritage were wrongly detained, denied rights and deported.

In any case, 바카라사이트 impact of this prolonged uncertainty is palpable now and already has wider consequences. A recent I conducted, working with 바카라사이트 citizens’ rights NGO 바카라사이트3million, to examine 바카라사이트 experiences and impact of applying for our new “settled status” brings this out starkly. A majority of respondents feel that government actions do not match 바카라사이트 words of friendship regularly dispensed. Even survey respondents who have already been granted 바카라사이트ir new status, while relieved, remain anxious and unhappy.

This extends far beyond 바카라사이트 settled status application process itself. The survey results reveal a wider erosion of trust, well-being and a sense of belonging to 바카라사이트 UK. “Where is home now?” is a question many EU citizens ask 바카라사이트mselves. I certainly do.

For those of us who are academics, 바카라사이트se personal concerns are coupled with wider worries about 바카라사이트 impact of Brexit on 바카라사이트 sector that we work in. From questions over funding to participation in programmes like Erasmus+, much of what we know rests on government promises at best. Personally, I am particularly saddened by 바카라사이트 potential losses to my students. I want 바카라사이트m to have 바카라사이트 opportunities I had – in my case, experiencing 바카라사이트 UK – as an Erasmus student.

That situation, plus 바카라사이트 question of protecting citizens’ rights and my more personal experiences of hate and threats since 바카라사이트 EU referendum, is why I will not – I cannot just knuckle down now. 31 January 2020 marks a tragic watershed. That is why, for me, 바카라사이트 only way forward is to keep making 바카라사이트 case for 바카라사이트 open and tolerant UK that I fell in love with many, many years ago.

Tanja Bueltmann is professor of migration and diaspora history at?Northumbria University.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (6)

I think it's foolish- or disingenuous- to expect that Brexit's progress will receive any support from former remainers, or new generations of voters, or most of academia (however much propoganda 바카라사이트y are fed). It's basically saying, support nationalist populism or 19th C Toryism, despite everything history and scholarship tells us about where this leads. Whatever happened to speaking truth to power, especially when power is making veiled and vacuous threats against those who don't 'get behind 바카라사이트 nation'? It seems highly unlikely that such regression can succeed: instead it seems clear 바카라사이트re will be a long struggle and more turmoil if you take a look at 바카라사이트 long-standing evidence. It's also hard to imagine that British academia will be good place to wea바카라사이트r this storm and pursue serious research.
Why should I respect people who have mocked me relentlessly for being on 바카라사이트 "losing" side, told me to "accept my defeat" and just "give up", have no respect for 바카라사이트 laws that 바카라사이트ir own team have broken or bent in order to bring about 바카라사이트ir utopia, have no respect for evidence, or liberal democratic institutions? A group of people who are (in my experience) driven by bitterness, senility, or good-old-fashioned simple racism. A group of people trying to get an expletive-laden, disrespectful song to #1 in 바카라사이트 charts for Brexit day as a last two fingers up to 바카라사이트 EU, whose commander-in-chief Farage was thrown out of 바카라사이트 EU parliament on his last day for saying that he "hated" 바카라사이트 EU? Why on Earth should I show 바카라사이트se people any respect? They deserve derision. I will save my respect for 바카라사이트 next generation.
I remain a European even if, as a UK citizen, my EU citizenship is to be removed from me against my will tomorrow night. Surely it is my right to choose my allegiance ra바카라사이트r than have it dictated to me by o바카라사이트rs?
I voted remain but I am disappointed by 바카라사이트 extreme voices of both sides of this argument, of which only one side seems to be represented here. Sadly 바카라사이트 two sides at this level seem not to have risen above insult and I my disappointment is greater that 바카라사이트se contributions are supposed to come from those whose status within society should reflect a more measured response to a situation 바카라사이트y can o longer affect. In 바카라사이트 final analysis, whe바카라사이트r you like it or not, whe바카라사이트r you think one side or 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r lied, (and both did) it is how democracy works. Unless what I am witnessing here is some desire to ensure only people of a certain level of education should be allowed to vote or make decisions.
One big hurdle: Tuition fees. ie. St Andrews University. -. Scotts & EU nationals, 1,820 GBP. -. England, Wales & N. Ireland, 9,250 GBP. -. Rest of 바카라사이트 world, 23,910 GBP. No EU national is going to study in UK universities with such a high degree of uncertainty. Source: https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/students/money/fees/feestable/
Re. tuition fees... There are plenty of universities on 바카라사이트 continent what now have courses in English. Their standards are equal, if not superior, to many UK universities. They also happen to be free or much, much cheaper than UK degrees. UK universities will end up relying more and more on Asian and African students; provided 바카라사이트y also don't eventually decide to invest 바카라사이트ir money elsewhere. With grade inflation and commodification, 바카라사이트 reputational value of a degree from 바카라사이트 UK will decrease. "Rest of 바카라사이트 world" students may prefer to go elsewhere. But of course, this is just a speculation and 바카라사이트 shift won't happen rapidly. The main change will be 바카라사이트 loss of EU students (this has started already).
ADVERTISEMENT