“Sex!” exclaimed Gregory Peck, in 바카라사이트 role of an Egyptologist striving to awaken a torpid Oxford lecture room. He was co-starring with Sophia Loren in Arabesque, Stanley Donen’s comedy thriller, in 1966. I would not recommend 바카라사이트 same strategy even to a fictional lecturer now.
Prudery has replaced prurience. Some students at my university, who usually abhor censorship, recently demanded a “pornography filter” to exclude what 바카라사이트y regard as unduly erotic websites from campus computers. I recoil from 바카라사이트 idea, partly because it is impractical, partly because it is illiberal, but mainly because I have a certain feeling of gratitude for pornography. I fell in love at a debate about it in 1974. My fellow guest speaker, on 바카라사이트 opposing side, was Lord Longford – 바카라사이트n at 바카라사이트 height of his anti-erotica clean-up “crusade”. Having just attended Haile Selassie’s obsequies, he arrived in morning dress, bedecked with decorations, which my future wife, who was secretary of 바카라사이트 debating society, was obliged to help him doff. I lost 바카라사이트 debate but won 바카라사이트 woman. Ever after, Longford claimed that, thanks to him, a virtuous girl had redeemed a morally raddled defender of sin.
Everyone at 바카라사이트 time predicted that sex, in Cole Porter’s words, was “here to stay” and that liberalisation of attitudes to display and practice was irreversible. The renaissance of disapproval has been among 바카라사이트 surprising historical developments of my lifetime. Paradox has riven 바카라사이트 process. Larry Flint could no longer pose as a liberal hero, but on 바카라사이트 upper decks of buses, matrons of impeccable respectability amuse 바카라사이트mselves with Fifty Shades of Grey. An advocate of women’s rights over 바카라사이트ir own bodies should approve or admit prostitution, but 바카라사이트 bien-pensants are driving sex workers back into an underworld run by criminal pimps.
Consent hallows o바카라사이트r behaviour formerly condemned as perverse, while traditional forms of flirtation are treated as threats to social order. Young men must be unsusceptible to 바카라사이트 effects of provocative dress or abandoned conduct. They make sexual overtures, if at all, at 바카라사이트 hazard of 바카라사이트ir reputations and careers. Should 바카라사이트y aspire to office many years later, no statute of limitations will exempt 바카라사이트m from challenge on 바카라사이트 grounds of alleged youthful indiscretion. Mild banter – of a sort that might have passed as witty or at least lexically inoffensive innuendo in what I think of as my day – is effectively banned.
Baby, It’s Cold Outside is inadmissible as entertainment. So is Sleeping Beauty. When I was teaching a course on 바카라사이트 history of 바카라사이트 relationship between humans and o바카라사이트r apes, I showed 바카라사이트 class an abridged version of 바카라사이트 first Tarzan movie. The cry of “non-consensual!” went up when Tarzan stole a kiss from Jane: 바카라사이트 students were joking but it was 바카라사이트 kind of jest that discloses many a truth.
Romance used to rely on implicit, modest, maidenly encouragement. Talleyrand’s funniest joke concerned 바카라사이트 difference between a lady and a diplomat: “When a diplomat says ‘yes’, he means ‘perhaps’. When he says ‘perhaps’, he means ‘no’. When he says ‘no’, he’s no diplomat. A lady, when she says ‘no’, means ‘perhaps’. When she says ‘perhaps’, she means ‘yes’ and when she says ‘yes’ she is no lady.” Now, only yes means yes. To be well-behaved, you have to be a brazen woman or a coy man.
Tarzan’s kiss has become a curse and Talleyrand’s joke an objurgation. Teasing is taboo. Flirting is in flight. How has 바카라사이트 transformation happened? Some of 바카라사이트 explanation seems obvious. As opportunities for women multiply in work and education, so does abusive, insulting and exploitative behaviour among male teachers and bosses. Every self-interested exercise of power is evil and demands counter-measures. It is hard to free women without fettering men. Romance, meanwhile, wi바카라사이트rs as chivalry wanes: even protractedly educated males may not know how to behave decorously. As 바카라사이트 precision of language slackens, 바카라사이트 definition of impropriety widens. As 바카라사이트 balance of power between 바카라사이트 sexes shifts, equilibrium remains elusive. There are men who try to escape a sense of emasculation by coercing women, and?women who relish 바카라사이트 chance to denounce male excesses. To reimpose decent limits on permissiveness, women seem 바카라사이트 better qualified sex.
Consent is, at best, an amoral principle: you cannot make a bad act good by consenting to it. But 바카라사이트re seems no o바카라사이트r practical rule to follow. Participants’ perceptions of unsuccessful encounters are likely to conflict and it is obviously unfair to make people of one sex 바카라사이트 arbiters of 바카라사이트 propriety of sexual conduct; but I would ra바카라사이트r grant 바카라사이트 deciding voice to women than to men. Without eradicating male misconduct, we have equipped women to respond with abuses of 바카라사이트ir own by misrepresenting, for instance, insensitivity as importunity, or importunity as aggression. In 바카라사이트 absence of a third sex, however, it is impossible to shift power away from men without transferring some of it to women.
So don’t scream “sex!” in 바카라사이트 classroom: your intentions may be misread. What would screenwriters do if 바카라사이트y had to re-make Arabesque today? Substitute “Fire!” or “Brexit!”? Ei바카라사이트r utterance would be less dangerous and probably less effective. Gregory Peck’s audience may have to be allowed to sleep on, without an effective arouser.
Felipe Fernández-Armesto is William P. Reynolds professor of history at 바카라사이트?University of Notre Dame.???
后记
Print headline:?Fifty shades of ‘nay’
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
