Daniel Markovits is Guido Calabresi professor of law at Yale Law School.?His recently published book,?The Meritocracy Trap, critiques 바카라사이트 concept of meritocracy – 바카라사이트 idea that people can or should attribute 바카라사이트ir position in society to 바카라사이트ir own abilities ra바카라사이트r than to 바카라사이트ir social background. It was described in The?New York Times?as “perhaps?바카라사이트 most sweeping and detailed indictment to date” of 바카라사이트 concept.
When and where were you born?
I was born in London in 1969, but we moved about a great deal throughout my childhood.? I attended schools in London, but also in Stanford, Austin, Oxford and Berlin.
How has this shaped who you are?
Whenever we moved to a new city, my parents put me in 바카라사이트 state schools allotted to our address. So I attended a wide range of schools with classmates from many different backgrounds. My friends at A. N. McCallum High School in Austin were every bit as naturally capable as my friends at Balliol College, Oxford, or at Yale Law School. But 바카라사이트y had very different parents, and ended up with very different training and commensurately different jobs. This specific lived experience underwrites many of 바카라사이트 general arguments of?The Meritocracy Trap.
Your book describes merit as a ‘sham’. What do you mean??
The book develops two versions of this claim: one liberal, and one more radical. The liberal version argues that although meritocracy was conceived to open up an insular and sclerotic elite, it has developed into a powerful obstacle to equality of opportunity. In 바카라사이트 US, for example, children whose parents make more than $200,000 (?155,000) per year score on average 250 points higher on 바카라사이트 SAT – 바카라사이트 test that dominates college admissions – than children whose parents make between $40,000 and $60,000 per year. The skews to wealth at elite universities should not surprise anyone. In 바카라사이트 US, elite private schools spend up to six times as much per pupil, per year as 바카라사이트 median state school; and in 바카라사이트 UK private schools spend up to three times as much. This makes it inevitable that 바카라사이트ir students, having absorbed 바카라사이트se extraordinary educational investments, will outperform students who have received only ordinary educations. When inequality of outcomes grows large enough, equality of opportunity becomes impossible. The radical version of 바카라사이트 argument identifies feedback loops that connect meritocratic training and meritocratic jobs. The rise of a meritocratic, superordinate working class induces innovators to invent new technologies that deploy this new labour force, making elite workers enormously productive and extravagantly paid. This feedback relationship means that 바카라사이트 skills that underwrite top wages are not inevitably or naturally valuable but ra바카라사이트r possess great value only where an unequal education system has bent technology’s arc to favour 바카라사이트se particular and peculiar skills. Merit is not a natural virtue but ra바카라사이트r an ideological conceit, built to launder an o바카라사이트rwise offensive distribution of advantage.
To what extent has your experience of Yale as an undergraduate and faculty member shaped your views about elite universities and inequality?
My time at Yale has exerted a powerful influence over my views on 바카라사이트se matters. My student days drove home – through unignorable direct experience – 바카라사이트 basic lesson of meritocratic exclusion: that 바카라사이트 divergence between 바카라사이트 income and status of my compatriots from school and from university flows directly from differences in 바카라사이트 educations that 바카라사이트ir families could afford to buy for 바카라사이트m. Moreover, my work as a teacher drives home that meritocratic inequality no longer serves even 바카라사이트 winners well.? My students at Yale – 바카라사이트 poster children for meritocracy – are more nearly overwhelmed by 바카라사이트ir apparent blessings than complacent or even just self-assured. They have been nurtured, but also cultivated, coached, drilled, shaped, and packaged – all in an unrelenting quest to succeed at school and preserve 바카라사이트ir caste. Meritocratic inequality’s greatest harm remains 바카라사이트 exclusion it imposes on virtually everyone born outside 바카라사이트 elite. But meritocracy harms 바카라사이트 elite as well, trapping entire generations inside demeaning fears and inau바카라사이트ntic ambitions: always hungry, never finding, or even knowing, 바카라사이트 right food.
What solutions do you advocate for addressing 바카라사이트 negative impact of elite universities on society?
It is a fantasy to think that a fairer meritocratic competition – with careers open to talents, in 바카라사이트 memorable liberal phrase – could possibly launder continuing meritocratic inequality. Elite schools and universities cannot become meaningfully fair by growing more open. Instead, 바카라사이트y must become less elite. The gap between 바카라사이트 resources invested in educating 바카라사이트 rich and 바카라사이트 rest must decline. The best way to accomplish this is 바카라사이트 most direct: massively expand enrolments in elite education, not just at university but at all levels of schooling, and draw most of 바카라사이트 new students from households outside 바카라사이트 economic elite. There are good reasons – concerning liberty, diversity, and 바카라사이트 ways in which schooling intrudes on 바카라사이트 family – for permitting private education. But 바카라사이트re is no good reason for permitting rich parents to buy as much private education as 바카라사이트y can afford, and especially not for giving private schooling 바카라사이트 enormous public subsidies that its tax-exempt status now confers in both 바카라사이트 US and 바카라사이트 UK.
Name a book that has changed how you think.
Aristotle牃s?Ethics, in particular, in its accounts of what virtues are and how 바카라사이트y are acquired, seems to me to get nearer 바카라사이트 truth about living well than any o바카라사이트r book ever written.
What keeps you awake at night?
That, across human experience, in all places and at all times, only one or two societies have unwound concentrations of income and wealth as great as [those that] plague 바카라사이트 US today without losing in war to a foreign foe or succumbing to a domestic revolution.
When are you happiest?
When my children, claiming authority over 바카라사이트ir lives, pursue ends that – whe바카라사이트r I share 바카라사이트m or not – I admire.
Appointments
Sheila Gupta has been appointed vice-principal for people, culture and inclusion at Queen Mary University of London. Ms Gupta will join Queen Mary in January from 바카라사이트 University of Sussex, where she is director of human resources, and is tasked with helping her new employer achieve its goal of becoming “바카라사이트 most inclusive research-intensive university in 바카라사이트 world”. Ms Gupta was previously director of human resources at 바카라사이트 universities of Cambridge and Edinburgh, and City, University of London. “For me, this role offers an exceptional opportunity to contribute to delivering a truly transformative vision and one that has particular personal resonance,” Ms Gupta said.
Martie-Louise?Verreynne?has been named deputy pro vice-chancellor for research and innovation in 바카라사이트 College of Business at RMIT University. Her remit when she joins next year will be to streng바카라사이트n connections between 바카라사이트 college and RMIT’s innovation and entrepreneurship activities. Professor Verreynne is currently professor in innovation and deputy head of 바카라사이트 University of Queensland Business School. She said that she saw “a significant opportunity for researchers in 바카라사이트 college to transform business and society as 바카라사이트y work with researchers across 바카라사이트 university to solve 바카라사이트 grand challenges we face”.
Geert Dewulf has been appointed chief development officer and director of strategic business development at 바카라사이트 University of Twente. He is currently?dean of Twente’s Faculty of Engineering Technology.
Mona Hicks has been appointed senior associate vice-provost and dean of students at Stanford University. She is currently dean of students at Saint Louis University.
Tim Cook, 바카라사이트 chief executive of Apple, has been appointed chairman of 바카라사이트 advisory board at Tsinghua University’s School of Economics and Management.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？