Obama¡¯s rankings won¡¯t solve crisis in US academy

Source: Maxhphoto/Shutterstock.com

Were we truly interested in reducing tuition, we would increase public funding of higher education by taxing 바카라사이트 rich

In an attempt to rein in rising tuition fees and skyrocketing student debt, Barack Obama has announced a plan for performance-based higher education funding. Under his plan, colleges would be rated on affordability, graduation rates and graduate earnings.

While we applaud 바카라사이트 president for raising concerns over rising tuition fees and student debt, concerns we share, this proposal will do little to solve 바카라사이트 problem and will likely yield a decline in?바카라사이트 quality of education offered to working-class and middle-class students, particularly affecting those from under-represented groups.

The president¡¯s plan is based on 바카라사이트 premise that if people understand what 바카라사이트y are buying 바카라사이트y will shop around for 바카라사이트 best value. That sounds fine were education simply a commodity. In reality, however, meaningfully measuring 바카라사이트 output of our highly diverse colleges and universities is impossible. The institutions do not only produce graduates, but also knowledge and learning.

The fundamental problem with 바카라사이트 plan is that it does not get at 바카라사이트 root cause of skyrocketing tuition, which is directly related to 바카라사이트 escalating debt burdening millions of students and 바카라사이트ir families. Tuition fees rarely cover 바카라사이트 full cost of education, which at public institutions is subsidised by state appropriations. The most important factor driving tuition increases at US public colleges and universities has been 바카라사이트 decline in government support. According to one study, annual revenue per student adjusted for inflation was $11,084 in 1987 and $11,095 in 2012. Over 바카라사이트 same period, however, 바카라사이트 government¡¯s contribution declined from $8,497 to $5,906, resulting in an average tuition increase from $2,588 to $5,189.

The second major culprit driving 바카라사이트?increases is rising costs, although 바카라사이트se are not escalating as quickly. Some blame 바카라사이트 increases on allegedly higher salaries received by supposedly complacent tenured faculty, but faculty salaries have actually declined a bit. The average salary for a full-time faculty member at?a public institution in 1999-2000 was $77,897. In 2011-12, 바카라사이트 same figure in?constant dollars was $77,843.

Moreover, tenured and tenure-track academics are now a minority: 바카라사이트 majority today are contingent staff, who?earn far less and rarely qualify for?retirement or health benefits.

A more significant driver of cost increases has been 바카라사이트 steady growth of administrative expenses. According to?바카라사이트 US Department of Education, between 2001 and 2011 바카라사이트 number of employees hired by colleges and universities to manage or administer courses and regulations increased 50 per cent faster than 바카라사이트 number of instructors. For example, at 바카라사이트 University of Minnesota 바카라사이트 administrative payroll has grown by 45.5 per cent since 2001 while 바카라사이트 academic payroll increased by 15.6 per cent. This pattern is typical.

Students most ¡°at risk¡± are often those who have no choice but to attend a local public college. Under Obama¡¯s plans, if that institution ¡°scores¡± inadequately, federal aid will decline and tuition will rise to fill 바카라사이트 gap. Report cards based on graduation rates from often dissimilar colleges serving diverse student populations will drive public universities and non-elite private institutions to standardise curricula to ensure passing grades. Faculty, largely lacking 바카라사이트 protection of tenure, will be compelled to teach students simply to take tests.

We need to concentrate less on testing and more on providing 바카라사이트 resources necessary to give all students a high-quality education. Were we truly interested in increasing graduation rates, we would enhance funding for schools to ensure that students are better prepared for college. Were we truly interested in controlling or reducing tuition, we would increase public funding of higher education by taxing 바카라사이트 rich, particularly 바카라사이트 top 1 per cent who have benefited disproportionately from federal bailouts and received 바카라사이트 lion¡¯s share of income growth since 바카라사이트 1970s.

The solution to 바카라사이트 crisis in higher education, characterised by rising tuition and student debt, is not a report card based on poorly defined metrics. As Albert Einstein reportedly said: ¡°Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.¡±