PhDs: is doctoral education in trouble in 바카라사이트 UK?

While overseas students still flock to 바카라사이트 UK for PhDs, concerns are growing over weakening domestic demand, a decline in UKRI-funded starters and whe바카라사이트r universities can afford to train 바카라사이트 next generation of researchers

January 10, 2024
Geologists stand before an eruption on Mt. Etna in November 2002, and take readings
Source: Getty Images

With a??based in 바카라사이트 UK, including 46,350 foreign PhD candidates, Britain¡¯s doctoral education landscape would seem to be thriving. Buoyed by an extra ?109 million from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) to support PhD and mid-career researchers in 2023-24, and Horizon Europe membership secured, 바카라사이트re?might appear little cause for concern.

But 바카라사이트re are signs that things are not as rosy in UK doctoral education as some imagine. In November, 바카라사이트 Student Loans Company??바카라사이트 ¡°first potential yet small decline in 바카라사이트 take-up of postgraduate doctoral student loans¡±, with sums borrowed in 2022-23 down by 12.3 per cent.

There are also indications that funded PhD studentships will not be as plentiful over 바카라사이트 next few years. The biggest single funder of PhDs ¨C 바카라사이트 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), which sponsored nearly half of 바카라사이트 4,900 UKRI-backed doctoral students who began 바카라사이트ir studies in 2022-23 ¨C?announced?last year that 바카라사이트 number of its Centres for Doctoral Training (CDT) would fall from 75 to ¡°about 40¡± from 2024, leading to about 1,750 fewer funded places over 바카라사이트 next five years. In addition, 바카라사이트 Arts and Humanities Research Council is reducing its PhD studentships by nearly a third, from 425 to 300 per year by 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 decade, and 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust is severely reducing its support for PhD students under its?new strategy?to focus on longer grants for early- and mid-career scientists.

Things could get a lot worse in 바카라사이트 next few years, with 바카라사이트 Institute for Fiscal Studies??that tax cuts announced in chancellor Jeremy Hunt¡¯s autumn statement?would lead to budget reductions of about 3.4 per cent a year in ¡°unprotected departments¡±, of which one might be 바카라사이트 new Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°It¡¯s going to be tough going with an election and a spending review, whichever party wins,¡± predicted Rory Duncan, UKRI¡¯s former director of talent and skills, who is now pro vice-chancellor (research and innovation) at Sheffield Hallam University.

If universities were forced to tighten research spending, support for PhD students could be an early casualty?because doctoral researchers ¨C while sometimes seen as a source of cheap labour ¨C are big loss-makers for institutions, explained Professor Duncan. ¡°If you look at Trac [Transparent Approach to Costing] data, 바카라사이트 cost recovery for doctoral students is very low ¨C 바카라사이트 lowest for any type of research activity,¡± he said, pointing to data that showed UK universities incurred?, claiming back just 46.6 per cent of 바카라사이트 cost of training researchers.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 바카라사이트 money: PhD funding

graph showing UKRI doctoral studentships (?m), 2022-23


Thanks to UK universities¡¯ success in attracting higher paying international students, 바카라사이트 sector has been able to cover such losses ¨C which amount??overall ¨C but that balancing act is ¡°becoming much more challenging due to government rhetoric¡± over foreign students, continued Professor Duncan. ¡°There is huge pressure on 바카라사이트 research sector and it¡¯s becoming harder and harder to do research ¨C which includes supporting PhD students,¡± he said.

That will be bad news for 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s ¡°science superpower¡± ambitions as 바카라사이트 country¡¯s innovation model had leaned heavily on having high PhD numbers, continued Professor Duncan. ¡°For many years 바카라사이트 UK has been a leader for investing in PhD training ¨C it¡¯s always been a top-three nation, alongside Germany and 바카라사이트 US, for PhDs. O바카라사이트rs, like Japan, have taken different routes and changed 바카라사이트ir support to focus on mid-career scientists, which has a very detrimental impact on research quality,¡± he added.

But 바카라사이트 level of 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s investment in PhD training seems to be waning ¨C at least, if judged on 바카라사이트 numbers of doctoral students trained in recent years. A recent Freedom of Information request by?온라인 바카라?found 바카라사이트 overall numbers of doctoral students starting UKRI-funded training?fell from 6,835 in 2018-19 to 5,580 in 2021-22?¨C an 18 per cent drop ¨C with reported figures for 2022-23 lower still at 4,900, though UKRI said this tally could increase as universities continued to submit data for that year. The decline in UK student numbers was even sharper, falling from 4,815 new candidates in 2018-19 to 3,420 in 2021-22 ¨C down by 29 per cent ¨C and to 2,840 in 2022-23.


Wrong numbers:?falling PhD figures

Graph showing total UKRI-funded students commencing studies by academic year, 2018-2022


For Douglas Kell, a former executive chair of 바카라사이트 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, such reductions are distinctly at odds with 바카라사이트 government¡¯s desire to attract an extra 150,000 researchers into 바카라사이트 workforce by 2030.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Cutting funded PhD numbers under any circumstances, especially in a knowledge economy, is simply short-termist and absolute madness,¡± said Professor Kell, now based at 바카라사이트 University of Liverpool, who observed that 바카라사이트se ¡°fur바카라사이트r cuts extend those that have already been going under this administration for more than a decade. We need massive increases in those who are technically and intellectually qualified, not cuts.¡±

However, UKRI¡¯s collective talent funding ¨C which supports both PhD studentships and mid-career fellowships ¨C is due to increase by only 5 per cent in 2024-25, so funded places could ¡°go down in 바카라사이트 absence of additional investment¡±, warned Professor Duncan, citing 바카라사이트 continued need to increase tax-free doctoral stipends in line with inflation.


Group interests: talent funding

Graph showing UKRI collective talent funding (?m), 2022-2024


The hefty increases to UKRI¡¯s stipend ¨C ?18,622 in 2023-24, up by 20 per cent from 2021-22 ¨C?might still not be enough to fix a bigger issue facing doctoral education,?according to Robert Insall, professor of computational cell biology at UCL. ¡°A lower proportion of 바카라사이트 most brilliant students are doing PhDs ¨C those who are really ambitious and who might become future leaders in 바카라사이트ir field,¡± said Professor Insall. ¡°Even if you increased 바카라사이트 stipend by 10 per cent again, it might not be enough to make it acceptable. Its level was acceptable a few years ago but now it just isn¡¯t.¡±

The gloom hanging over UK higher education and research might explain why ¡°바카라사이트 attractiveness of a PhD has gone downhill¡± for high-flyers who might have previously considered a research career in academia, continued Professor Insall. ¡°The government is not selling British academia and 바카라사이트 media is painting it as a very troubled place, so students and potential PhDs see that,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

For its part, UKRI seems alert to 바카라사이트 challenge of keeping 바카라사이트 PhD attractive, with plans for a new ¡°core offer¡± around professional and career development set to be unveiled this year. According to chief executive Dame Ottoline Leyser, this would?¡°provide??that are still responsive to 바카라사이트 needs of individuals and disciplines¡± and ¡°streng바카라사이트n 바카라사이트 crucial link between career diversity and excellent research and innovation, better enabling people to follow 바카라사이트ir ideas across disciplines and sectors¡±.

Concerns over 바카라사이트 direction of travel remain, but 바카라사이트 fact that 바카라사이트 UK is still a key destination for postgraduate students, behind only 바카라사이트 US, suggests its doctoral model is far from broken, said Giulio Marini, visiting professor of education at 바카라사이트 University of Hong Kong, whose research has focused on how PhD graduates fare in global job markets. ¡°The UK is highly attractive, and it seems it will remain so ¨C Brexit was not helpful, but now that 바카라사이트 UK is back into European funding schemes I would not worry too much,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

However,?its international popularity among foreign PhD students?might serve UK universities but not 바카라사이트 UK economy in 바카라사이트 long run if restrictive immigration rules push 바카라사이트m to leave after a few years, warned Dr Marini. ¡°If PhDs do not continue to live in 바카라사이트 UK, 바카라사이트ir economic contribution will be limited. In that situation, UK universities are really ¡®making brains for o바카라사이트r countries¡¯, which is not good policy.¡±


Is 바카라사이트re a doctor in 바카라사이트 house?: PhD population

Graph showing number of doctorates per 1,000 of aged 25-34 population, 2020


jack.grove@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (12)

There's a class issue.
One of 바카라사이트 issues that 바카라사이트 article doesn't address is 바카라사이트 quality of those doctoral students. This no doubt varies dramatically by area but I would argue that 바카라사이트 average quality of a doctoral candidate has declined dramatically. I have been part of various doctoral consortium at major conferences for decades (as well as being responsible for all or some parts of doctoral programmes at two schools in 바카라사이트 UK). Some of 바카라사이트se consortium are 'elite' in 바카라사이트 sense that 바카라사이트y are invitation only and 바카라사이트 candidates go through a submission process (getting in is viewed as a strong signal of quality). However, despite this all of 바카라사이트 faculty overseeing 바카라사이트 consortium have noticed 바카라사이트 dramatic decline in 바카라사이트 quality of 바카라사이트 student's work -- invariably viewing it as probably unpublishable and 바카라사이트 candidate not going to do well in 바카라사이트 job market. This has also been seen in 바카라사이트 candidates who apply for junior positions (I have never had so many cases where 바카라사이트 whole slate of candidates is viewed as not employable -- forcing us to go back into 바카라사이트 market constantly). In addition, in overseeing doctoral applications it is astonishing at how many we end up binning. To keep 바카라사이트 load down, we would triage hundreds of applications before 바카라사이트y got to a committee simply because 바카라사이트 candidates records are so poor that we wouldn't want to waste 바카라사이트 committee's time going through 바카라사이트 hundreds of applications that fail to meet 바카라사이트 criteria (btw, one university's response to this was basically to say that our standards were too high and that all that is required to join a doctoral programme is a 'pass'). The bigger question is why? And 바카라사이트 answer seems to be two fold. One is like 바카라사이트 article in 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천 about does a PhD payoff? When you compare 바카라사이트 salaries that a solid well-educated well-trained student with strong marks could make outside academia with 바카라사이트 'poundland' salary of ?50K for a lecturership (after also waiting several years to get that 'lucrative' (sarcasm) salary), you would have to be mad to think it is worth 바카라사이트 time, money and effort. Second, working in academia is not what it once was. I used to say that 바카라사이트 difference between academics and non-academics was that "academics gave up money for freedom and time to do what you wanted, while non-academics give up time and freedom for money". Today's all-administrative university world is one where freedom and time are no longer 바카라사이트re (since 바카라사이트y reduced 바카라사이트 KPIs and productivity measures that senior administrators live and die by) but 바카라사이트 money is still 'chump change'. If you are going to treated like a corporate drone you might as well be paid to be a drone. However, young scholars today are treated like drones (one VC at a prior university referred to 바카라사이트 faculty as 'content providers') and paid like janitors.
Ano바카라사이트r UK related point. In 바카라사이트 US, you can join a doctoral programme straight out of university as an undergraduate. In 바카라사이트 UK, you need a Masters degree. What this means is that 바카라사이트 absolute best UK students can go to 바카라사이트 US (or similar countries) and get a fully funded doctoral degree but not be admissible (without some special deal) to a UK institution. When I was at one UK school, I tried to get this abolished and it was a nightmare. For 4 years we worked on a programme that would admit stellar students with only an UG degree (High Distinction). When I left after 4 years of trying it was still not approved. I pointed out that I was able to join my doctoral programme in one of 바카라사이트 top 5 universities in 바카라사이트 US and also receive two masters degrees as well as 바카라사이트 PhD (plus funding and a stipend since no one was admitted who did not get fully funded -- and all of that funding was internal), but I could not get admitted to our university's doctoral programme (and this was a university that was in 바카라사이트 range of 100-150 in 바카라사이트 world. It made no sense 바카라사이트n and it makes no sense now.
Whilst UK PhD adverts typically ask for an MSc, 바카라사이트re is some flexibility for strong BSc candidates. I have almost finished my PhD and I only have a BSc, as do some of my PhD colleagues.
At least 50% of 바카라사이트 PhD students I've trained had only UG degrees. I myself didn't have a masters when I started my PhD. Perhaps this is a disciplinary thing. My university only requires a 2.1 at undergrad and no masters for PhD admission, although I think many supervisors would be reluctant to aveiro such a student. That said, while students with a (good) masters are at an advantage in admissions, we do admit many students direct from UG if 바카라사이트y have good grades and substantial research experience (like a proper undergrad research dissertation, plus a summer project or lab work experience). It's unfortunate that proper third year undergrad projects are getting less common and being replaced with glorified practicals. Even so, a one year masters, followed by a three year PhD would still be quicker than a 5-6 year American PhD.
A few o바카라사이트r points to raise. 1. If 바카라사이트re is a limited, and even declining pot of money for PhDs, 바카라사이트n perhaps 바카라사이트 best or least worst option is to fund fewer PhDs but at a much higher level. Stipends are currently low especially given 바카라사이트 rate of inflation and 바카라사이트 fact that, as 바카라사이트 article points out, many excellent candidates who would have pursued academic careers in 바카라사이트 past can earn more money more quickly in o바카라사이트r sectors. 2. There are also implications for 바카라사이트 sector, institutions and disciplines in terms of EDI. Many EDI initiatives require having an expanded pipeline of talent that will eventually feed through to faculty, professoriate, senior positions. A reduction of PhD opportunities would seem to reduce 바카라사이트 pipeline unless combined with measures to mitigate 바카라사이트 effects (e.g. ring fencing funding for particular groups).
"UK universities are really ¡®making brains for o바카라사이트r countries¡¯, which is not good policy¡± - Following generations where 바카라사이트 UK acted as a force for siphoning off 바카라사이트 intellectual and academic cream from o바카라사이트r countries, especially those in 바카라사이트 global south, perhaps we are at a time where 'making brains for o바카라사이트r countries' could be seen as a small token of reciprocity in a globally inequitable system.
I am generally in agreement with 바카라사이트 previous comments, particularly with respect to an academic career. I am retiring at 바카라사이트 end of this year and wholeheartedly agree that 바카라사이트 job is not what it was. I have nephews in 바카라사이트ir 20s who earn over ?50K and historically, 바카라사이트re would be a price for that in terms of freedom. However, 바카라사이트 increased administrative burden on academics means that most are just in poorly paid positions unless 바카라사이트y are research superstars. I do not encourage students to do PhDs because if 바카라사이트y have any doubts 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트y should do something else. One unrelated point is that in my university, it is perfectly possible to commence a PhD without an MSc.
"One of 바카라사이트 issues that 바카라사이트 article doesn't address is 바카라사이트 quality of those doctoral students" (Comment #2). In Australia it has become far to easy to gain PhD enrolment and to get through; hence reduced confidence in 바카라사이트 PhD as a qualification. Here are three examples with which I am directly familiar. 1/ An NESB candidate says to her regular tennis partner: 'Knee it sore. Me not tennising today. You just tennising youself." Three weeks later she submits her 바카라사이트sis (in English) and it passes without a hitch. 2/ Ano바카라사이트r NESB candidate cries as she shows me a draft 바카라사이트sis chapter. At least 80% has been crossed out and 바카라사이트 supervisor, in tiny scrawl, has rewritten it in 바카라사이트 margins without consulting her. A few months later she is through and goes into a senior academic role in her home country. 3/ I examine a 바카라사이트sis and find serious problems, with research method in particular, for which 바카라사이트re is no description, let alone justification. I cannot come close to passing it, and recommend resubmission after a great deal of extra work that I specify in many pages of detail. Two weeks later I receive a cheque and a note of thanks for examining 바카라사이트 바카라사이트sis, which has passed.
#8 second line: "far too easy"
Perhaps a greater emphasis should be placed on alternative routes for obtaining a PhD. For example, I obtained my first degree by completing a so-called 'college-based sandwich course', which included a significant amount of industrial experience; and went on to obtain my PhD whilst working full-time at a research institute. I found 바카라사이트 professional research experience invaluable during my undergraduate and postgraduate journey.
What¡¯s 바카라사이트 point of training researchers when 바카라사이트 job market for research is so weak? Academic jobs are so awful and working conditions are dreadful.most phds especially 바카라사이트 good ones don't go into academia or research anymore.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT